|
Post by haysoos on Sept 7, 2018 10:31:36 GMT -5
Comb Jellies, or Ctenophores are ridiculous creatures that look like cheesy CGI. Their overall body plan is similar to a jellyfish, but they're in a completely different group (there are a variety of structural differences involving the ontological origins of different layers of tissues, and the fundamental structure of cells in their neural network, but basically they look like jellyfish but aren't). They have striated bands of little rows of cilia that they beat in rhythmic fashion for both propulsion and creating currents that sweeps in food. The bands of cilia look sort of like combs, which where they get their common name. Most have bio-luminescence, creating light in the Stygian depths of the oceanic abyss. But the flickering LED rainbow colours aren't produced that way. Instead, it an artifact of prismatic refraction caused by the movement of their tiny cilia. Cilia are commonly used for locomotion by protozoa and other single-celled organisms, but comb jellies are the largest critters to swim using microscopic hairs. How largest? Most are only a few millimeters across, nearly microscopic themselves, but some species can be up to 1.5 meters across (about 5 feet)! Almost all comb jellies are predators (there is one genus that is partly parasitic). They eat other comb jellies, and zooplankton, including fish larvae, and have an amazing array of different ways of catching their prey. Some hang motionless, hanging their tentacles in the water like a spider web. Some drag a sticky line that captures prey like a fishing line. Some eat jellyfish, steal their stinging cells, and use them instead of their own form of stinging cells to capture more prey. While humans are well known for being bags of mostly water, that is even more true for comb jellies. They're pretty much entirely salt water with a little bit of tissue. This means they're not terribly nutritious - but they are easy to digest. Like popcorn twists! Nothing really specializes in eating them, but when they are abundant predators like sea turtles, jellyfish and salmon can gorge themselves on the squooshy little rainbow balls.
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Sept 20, 2018 21:55:59 GMT -5
Nudibranch, anyone? These sea slugs are weird and real and ridiculously alien-looking, but guess what? They're your distant relatives, relatively speaking. The world is really full of things - in this case, brightly-colored squishy things.
There's like a gazillion of them, all amazing. This fellow ^ is called a Sea Bunny, aw.
^ Sea Sheep! Ridiculous.
It really doesn't end.
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Sept 22, 2018 14:50:02 GMT -5
I think it's safe to say the ocean has the highest ratio of ridiculous looking animals per capita
|
|
|
Post by King Charles’s Butterfly on Sept 24, 2018 15:59:33 GMT -5
I think it's safe to say the ocean has the highest ratio of ridiculous looking animals per capita
The perv board is back, baby
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Sept 25, 2018 8:33:12 GMT -5
Look at this caterpillar!
|
|
|
Post by Mrs David Tennant on Sept 25, 2018 14:23:57 GMT -5
I really wonder what the evolutionary advantage of these vivid colors on insects or sea life. Is it that predators see colors as dangerous?
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Sept 26, 2018 23:14:55 GMT -5
I really wonder what the evolutionary advantage of these vivid colors on insects or sea life. Is it that predators see colors as dangerous? haysoos will know!
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Sept 26, 2018 23:21:30 GMT -5
LOOK AT THIS TECHNICOLOR INDIAN GIANT SQUIRREL
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Sept 27, 2018 0:14:24 GMT -5
I really wonder what the evolutionary advantage of these vivid colors on insects or sea life. Is it that predators see colors as dangerous? haysoos will know! In many cases, especially in insects it is indeed that predators see those colours as dangerous. Technically, this is known as aposematic colouration. Predators learn pretty quickly that when you try to eat one of these brightly coloured critters, you get a mouth full of bitter foulness, horrible smells, stings or even lethal doses of poison. Because their protection from predators relies on the predators seeing these signals, many critters with aposematic colouration also seem pretty fearless. They wander about right in the open, even in predator rich environments. Some examples include poison dart frogs, monarch butterflies, ladybird beetles and even the black and white stripes of the skunk. Some of these aposematic colour schemes takes advantage of what is known as Mullerian mimicry - where groups of animals with defense systems evolve very similar markings to each other, so that when a predator learns to avoid one, they learn to avoid them all. The myriad species of bees and wasps are an example, where many of them have the same kind of flashy black and yellow stripes. There is another form of this colouration, known as Batesian mimicry, where an actually harmless critter takes on the colour pattern of a stingy, bitey, toxic bastard critter. Hover flies, for example, are completely harmless, but have very few predators because they have stripes like a bee. They'll even fly right up in your face and hover in front of you going "Nah ha ha ha! FEAR ME! I am a stingy bastard!" even though they literally cannot harm a fly. I call Batesian mimicry the "Everyone's afraid of a loonie" strategy. In some critters, the vibrant colours are the mark of what's called epigamic colouration. You see this often in sexually dimorphic species, where the male is really colourful, while the female is sensibly camouflaged and stealthy. Many songbirds have this, as well as quite a few insects. These colours are used just to show off how awesome they are, because apparently nothing impresses chicks more than a dude who does incredibly stupid, dangerous things and yet manages to survive. That it actually works is evident in the fact that evolution actually favours these displays, and the stupid, flashy males actually do mate more often than drab, sensible males. A quick look around your average High School will show that this sort of behaviour is tragically successful even in human gene pools. I call this the "Here, hold my beer" strategy. For nudibranchs, it's often thought that the bright colours may be aposematic. Many of them feast on critters like sea anemones, and are somehow able to ingest their venomous stinging cells (called nematocysts) without triggering them, and migrate them intact into the fleshy, vividly coloured projections on their backs and sides. Some feed on toxic (brightly coloured) sea sponges, and become toxic themselves. Eating a nudibranch is pretty risky, and so have warning colours seems like it would be a good idea. However... there is very little evidence of any kind of Mullerian mimicry in nudibranchs. Each one of them is vividly coloured in a completely different and spectacular way. If it was an aposematic colouration, there should be an advantage in sharing a signal, and more species would look alike. There's also the fact that many of these bright colours aren't really visible underwater. Short wavelengths like red, orange and yellow don't travel far underwater, and so aren't really visible to most of their predators, who don't usually go diving with bright spotlights like underwater photographers use. Many of the nudibranchs are nocturnal too, and are actually pretty cryptic in their lifestyle - they hide under rocks and don't advertise themselves much. So maybe they're epigamic colours. Except nudibranchs themselves can't really see for shit. They're probably not choosing mates by how colourful they are. Also, many are hermaphroditic. No advantage for expendable males, but cryptic females there. Not all nudibranchs are brightly coloured too. The largest one, the California black sea hare is just a big blob of black. These problems are even more pronounced for deep sea critters, where there's very little or even no light at all for anyone, predator or potential mate alike to see how colourful they are. Which is all a long way of saying... um, we don't know.
|
|
|
Post by Mrs David Tennant on Sept 27, 2018 10:29:53 GMT -5
I love this place - there's always someone who knows things about stuff (stuff about things?)! Thanks, haysoos!
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Oct 30, 2018 20:04:40 GMT -5
Look at these moving blackberries! (black oranda goldfish)
|
|
|
Post by King Charles’s Butterfly on Nov 1, 2018 21:51:28 GMT -5
^^^ Oranda is Japanese for “Netherlands,” and looking it up they evidently did think this fish came from there (it came from China, but maybe the Dutch brought it to Japan).
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Nov 5, 2018 19:13:10 GMT -5
Is it some kind of weird dog/spider hybrid from the director's cut of The Island of Dr. Moreau? Nope, its real. And of course it has a ridiculous (but kinda creepy) name to go with it: Bunny Harvestman btw, doesn't Bunny Harvestman sound like a housewife from the Upper West Side in the 60's?
|
|
|
Post by Mrs David Tennant on Nov 13, 2018 16:54:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Nov 13, 2018 22:33:37 GMT -5
Ok, I think we can go ahead and shut this down.
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Nov 13, 2018 23:43:58 GMT -5
Ok, I think we can go ahead and shut this down. No! Never.
Look at this sheepshead fish with its terrible, terrible, ridiculously human-like teeth - I mean if humans had rows and rows of far too many teeth:
Apparently they're delicious? I dunno, fish are weird and the ocean is full of ridiculous creatures.
|
|
|
Post by Mrs David Tennant on Nov 13, 2018 23:48:25 GMT -5
*shudders violently*
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Oct 4, 2019 23:10:37 GMT -5
Did you know that the narwhal's 'horn' is actually a greatly-extended, helix-spiral-shaped canine tooth that pokes through his upper lip? That is some crazy shit.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Oct 5, 2019 23:47:22 GMT -5
I'm so happy this thread has been resurrected. I hadn't seen it before. It is delightful!
|
|
|
Post by King Charles’s Butterfly on Oct 6, 2019 12:33:15 GMT -5
The strange beauty of sea urchin anuses, which are big sacks meant to blow out pellets aware from the sea urchin’s body:
And now for a money shot
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Oct 8, 2019 17:59:25 GMT -5
I....I don't know if I will ever feel safe after seeing this, but there is some comforting news in the threads if you choose to read further.
The snail, according to twitter so..., can regrow the tissue and survive this. Nature is fucked up.
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Oct 8, 2019 18:22:17 GMT -5
Happy World Octopus Day, everyone. They are amazing creatures in so, so many ways. I love them (and all the other cephalopods too).
Look at this crazy Blanket Octopus! wtf
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Oct 9, 2019 17:35:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Oct 10, 2019 10:04:38 GMT -5
Since we're revisiting the Leucochloridium infected snails, and saiga antelope, here's another call back:
Footage of the ridiculously cute kittens of the sand cat (Felis margarita)
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Oct 10, 2019 10:25:30 GMT -5
And as a cephalopod bonus, how about a short film on the flamboyant cuttlefish, a tiny but amazing little creature that wanders the sea floor of the Indo-Pacific hypnotizing prey and being fabulous?!
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Oct 10, 2019 11:21:14 GMT -5
Since we're revisiting the Leucochloridium infected snails Oh! I guess I was so horrified the first time I heard about these that I blocked it out. Which means I will eventually be able to block the memory of seeing the video I linked. This sand cat video is helping. Those tiny little things are so cute!
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Oct 11, 2019 10:47:43 GMT -5
Here are some true facts about the carnivorous dragonflies
Seriously, this video has some of the best footage of dragonfly larvae I've seen anywhere, especially of their hunting and feeding.
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Oct 11, 2019 14:07:42 GMT -5
I refuse to believe that isn't some photography trick to make a Dr. Seuss illustration look real.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Oct 11, 2019 14:23:38 GMT -5
I refuse to believe that isn't some photography trick to make a Dr. Seuss illustration look real. The saiga disdainfully scoffs at your cynical skepticism
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Oct 11, 2019 15:20:49 GMT -5
I refuse to believe that isn't some photography trick to make a Dr. Seuss illustration look real. The saiga disdainfully scoffs at your cynical skepticism DEEPFAKE
|
|