|
Post by Dr. Rumak on May 29, 2024 19:25:39 GMT -5
Next up: Drowning By Numbers. That's my favorite Greenaway film, but maybe it's because I was a math major.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,690
|
Post by repulsionist on Jun 3, 2024 22:49:28 GMT -5
Five Nights at Freddy's (2023)
As one of the many guides to a 12 year-old's life, I sit and watch flicks with this kid that I'm mostly in charge of their growing up. We watched this. Peeta mugged mean the whole flick, and I wholly feel that's probably his shtick. The other humans, well, they were there. Enjoyed Lillard's turn as the turd. Coulda sworn those pine forests looked like something outta Central Florida. S'was alright, I guess. I felt like chucking a hunk o' cheese at the Showbiz film to deter the creatures' moral plight.
Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (2022)
More watching with a kid stuff here. Is there a grawlix for exhaling in a sigh and saying "Oh, this shit." while rolling eyes?
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Jun 4, 2024 1:00:57 GMT -5
Here is a slopheap of movies I watched over the past couple of weeks.
Blind Woman's Curse (1970) - I wished I liked this more than I did. It had a lot of thematic stuff that I’m into and a pretty stellar cast but for whatever reason it never really clicked for me. I think the big problem is that it’s trying to be two different movies at the same time but never really succeeds in making it work so for like half the movie you’ve got various gangs beefing over turf (which seems to consist primarily of a carnival and a noodle restaurant) and then the other half is a weird supernatural thriller with ill omens, murderous hunchbacks and a side show akin to the one in that fucked up Midori cartoon I saw that one time. Either one of these would be a fine-ass movie but they just do not work together at all but the thing that bums me out more than any of that is the fact that Meiko Kaji is theoretically the star of this but spends way too much of the movie just sort of hanging out while everyone else does interesting shit. She has a decent fight at the end but again is kind of secondary for a lot of it. At the end of the day all this really made me want to do was rewatch Lady Snowblood.
Skyscraper (2018) - While the dumb action part of this movie was fine dumb-ass action I am amazed by the fact the the Rock had more romantic chemistry with an exploding skyscraper in this movie than he did with Neve Campbell, a woman who you could pair with pretty much any other man or woman in Hollywood as a cinematic love interest and have it be believable.
Ivy + Bean: The Ghost That Had To Go (2022) - I watched this with my kid who has read all the Ivy + Bean books. She dug it. I thought it was fine children's fare. The kids they got to act in it are pretty good but unless you're a small child or watching it with a small child or maybe a young adult that read these books as a kid there's not really anything here worth bothering with.
Ivy + Bean: Doomed To Dance (2022) - In the third (and currently final) Ivy and Bean movie Ivy and Bean start taking ballet because they are of the mind the ballet involves "kicking peoples' heads off" but quickly find out that it does not and also that they are terrible at what ballet actually is. Of all the Ivy + Bean movies I think this one was probably the funniest. The other two movies both had their humorous moments but this one had multiple scenes that caused me to crack up which is a pretty impressive feat for a movie that is aimed at small children.
Ring of Fire (1991) - Finally a movie that dared to ask the question, “What if Romeo and Juliet was about a Chinese guy that knew kung fu falling in love with a girl from a rival American gang in California!” Overall I thought this was okay. Both Don “The Dragon” Wilson and Maria Ford are likable enough as the star-crossed lovers and the fights are perfectly serviceable early 90s direct to video American martial arts flick fare but I have a pretty big problem with this movie namely the fact that pretty much all the action happens in the last 20 minutes or so. Like there’s some kickboxing tournament to start and then it’s basically just a romantic melodrama until the last 20 minutes when guys start talking about doing a street fight “the old Thai way” with fists covered in broken glass and racism gets solved via roundhouse kicks. I’m honestly kind of confused who this was supposed to be geared too. Like people who are stoked about a movie featuring the World Kickboxing Federation’s Welterweight Champion (or whatever title the main villain dude was listed as having in the end credits) are going to be bored that most of the movie’s runtime is just a straightforward romance movie and people who want a love story are going to be put off by the fact that everything gets resolved with underground pitfighting.
Hellmaster (1992) - There are some cool visuals in this and decently creepy vibes at times but the editing is kind of a mess and they do a piss poor job of explaining who most of the characters are or why we should give a fuck about them but if you want a movie where a college jock randomly walks around with a bullwhip for some reason and John Saxon is a leather trench coat wearin' cult leader with weird little freak minions this is a movie that has both of those things.
The Big Bird Cage (1972) - It’s kind of weird how this movie, with its lighter tone and attempts at humor, ended up feeling nastier than its more serious and straightforward sister film, The Big Doll House. I don’t know if it was just the tonal whiplash between the stuff that was clearly supposed to be funny and the acts of abject cruelty or the fact that 90% of the “humor” boiled down to “Gay men exist lol…” (or some combination of the two) but this was kind of rough at times. It also didn’t help that Pam Grier was barely in it. I mean the other actresses were fine but none of them are Pam Grier so there was a dip in the level of awesomeness whenever she wasn’t on screen.
The Brain Eaters (1958) - I love a pop culture thing about brain fuckler worms. Baldur's Gate III! That one episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation! And now this 1950s b-movie, The Brain Eaters! It's all good shit! Here you also have Leonard Nimoy (or Nemoy as he's credited) as a brain fuckled subterranean wizard, scientists smoking pipes, fist fights that are entirely double axe handle based and a mess of characters that are constantly referred to by their full-ass names. While this wasn't great cinema by any stretch of the imagination it was a fairly entertaining 50s b-movie which is more than I hoped for going into it.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 4, 2024 10:35:06 GMT -5
First We Bombed New Mexico (2023)
Documentary about the Tularosa Downwinders suffering radiation effects to this day from the Trinity Site explosion in July 1945 (not-exactly-fun fact I only recently learned: the Trinity Site's name isn't actually a Christian reference; it was named that by Oppenheimer from a John Donne poem about the "three personed god"). The feds have never acknowledged that there was fallout and black rain despite mountains of evidence and New Mexico residents were excluded from the 1980 Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. There's current legislation to include NM in RECA expansion and, as someone who moved from Missouri to New Mexico, it's odd to see Sen. Josh Hawley tag-teaming on it with Ben Ray Lujan (St. Louis-area residents were also affected by the Manhattan Project).
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Jun 4, 2024 13:58:33 GMT -5
Space Truckers 1996 How had I never seen this before? A gloriously weird mashup of Star Wars and Mad Max by way of Smokey and the Bandit. I watched the first ten minutes and they had me at "Dennis Hopper is a space semi driver hauling genetically engineered square pigs". Steven Dorff is his unwilling partner, and Debi Mazar is the space truckstop waitress they both like. Charles Dance, Norm from Cheers, Wez with a ponytail, and a host of 90's character actors chew up the scenery. While it's far from masterpiece, it's pretty entertaining. The special effects are mostly really good, and when they aren't, they are gleefully cheesy. The killer robot super soldiers are especially well done. it's great that that the characters mostly talk and act like actual people with believable (under the situation) motivations, but my favorite thing about it is that Dennis Hopper gets to be he good guy. That didn't happen nearly often enough.
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Jun 5, 2024 11:51:32 GMT -5
Phew, all right:
My Cousin Vinny: Just an exceptionally well-written and acted comedy. I'd seen most of this on cable years ago, but I had forgotten how evenhanded the movie is with practically every character, even the sheriff and slightly slimy prosecutor. Aside from maybe the shitkicker pool hustler Vinny beats up, the movie doesn't really have a villain. (Which is maybe a cop-out, given what we know of the state of the justice system in the Deep South). Fred Gwynne is great. Marisa Tomei deserved (to the extent that anyone deserves) that Oscar!
Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness: Liked it; I think C loved it. I thought it was weird how it both required you to have seen WandaVision--there had to have been a bunch of confused audience members wondering why Wanda suddenly had kids--but also went out of its way to undo Wanda's character growth in that series. That said, I think MoM (wait, seriously, it spells out "mom"? just realized that as I was typing) is pretty unfairly maligned, and a definite improvement over its predecessor. I just wish they had brought back Giacchino for the score, as his Doctor Strange 1 score is probably my favorite of the MCU movies and latter-day Danny Elfman seems to have lost the ability to write a remotely interesting melody.
Official Competition: A Spanish black comedy wherein a film auteur deliberately pits her two stars (a vapid international mega-celebrity and a pretentious drama school professor) against each other for...reasons. Art, I guess? It's funny, but almost exclusively in the intellectual "ah, yes, this satire is biting" mode than the reflexive "this is currently making me laugh" mode. It's well-made, but kind of slight.
Dune (2021): About as good a (half-)Dune adaption as you can get. Production design is incredible. I always interpreted Book!Paul as kind of a sad little elf boy, so I thought the Timothee Chalamet casting was on point. C hasn't read the books and was following along pretty well, but we did have to pause a couple of times to talk about, e.g., what the the hell "spice" is and why it's so important. Hey, a Zimmer score I actually like!
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3: Loved it; I think C liked it. The best MCU move in years, not the least because it makes zero effort to link up with whatever bullshit is currently going on in the broader MCU. It's funny, it's fun, it's gross (really pushing that PG-13/R boundary in spots), and it's at times shockingly heartwarming. The villain: a) is utterly unhinged and irredeemably evil; b) has motives that are clear and comprehensible even if they're insane, and c) is fun to watch--a combination that the MCU has been famously inept at nailing. It's quite clear that Gunn would not have been able to make this movie if Disney hadn't stupidly fired him in the first and then basically been bullied by his actors and fans into rehiring him. He had a lot of leash, and it shows.
The Young Girls/Ladies of Rochefort: I think my first French new wave film? Loved it! Breezy, colorful, joyful--both a celebration and a very subtle subversion of big Hollywood musical comedies like "An American in Paris." Gene Kelly's even in this somehow. The songs are catchy if slightly samey--not a whole lot of stylistic variation between themes so they all kind of run together, albeit in a pleasantly jazzy sort of way.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 5, 2024 12:45:57 GMT -5
I did not intend to accidentally create a "writer-director Curtis Hanson adapting a crime novel" double feature. Not at all. These movies are 20 years apart! But I signed up for Criterion Channel, this looked fun, put it on, boom, his name in the credits. Know who else's name is in the credits besides Elliott Gould and Christopher Plummer? John freaking Candy as a coworker whose sheer confidence wins over the hot new blonde colleague who thinks it's appropriate to wear - to work - in a bank - T-shirts that say things like "Penalty for Early Withdrawal." This definitely takes a cue from Hitchcock in the blend of juvenile humor (see: those T-shirts), grisly violence (Plummer decapitates someone with a fish tank), romance, and double-crossing suspense and treachery. Also, the characters are smart and do smart things, and the filmmakers expect you to follow along rather than having big blinking arrows pointing out what they did. Gould is a boring, shy, geeky bank teller who rejects the flirtations of women so he can play with his beloved pet fish. He realizes that the weird mall Santa isn't just being weird - he's casing the joint. So when Santa steps up to his register and demands all the cash, Gould is ready. Not to call the cops. To steal all the money himself. Then, of course, all sorts of chaos happens. The bank robber (Plummer) turns out to be generally psychotic, violent to women, and evil. And he wants the cash. Gould wants to keep it. And a coworker (Susannah York) notices something is up. There are definitely a lot of improbabilities to swallow here - most of them to do with how you decapitate someone with a fish tank and dispose the body without anyone noticing, but also how Plummer's villain is able to keep any woman around for long. But whatever. It's fun, it's tightly constructed, and it has all kinds of great little moments. Like the phone ringing and Plummer saying, "Think of a number." Or the amazingly chilling line that's something like "I'm not going to shoot you from here," and the reaction it causes. Or John Candy's Greek (?) wedding. This definitely deserves to be better-known. I watched this over the weekend to kick off my annual Summer of Noirs. It didn't 100% work for me--I think it's the Hitchcock elements that you identified, whose filmography I struggle with and often find simplistic and uninvolving. Still, plenty to admire here. Nice to see Toronto's own Christopher Plummer get a meaty role during a low period in his career (same year as Starcrash).
|
|
|
Post by MrsLangdonAlger on Jun 6, 2024 16:46:36 GMT -5
Watching The First Omen of course made me have to rewatch Possession.
Thoughts on the former: pretty good, Nell Tiger Free is an incredible actress.
Thoughts on the latter: JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jun 8, 2024 13:48:04 GMT -5
Songs of Earth—Director Margareth Olin, feeling her parents’ mortality approaching, went back to her home fjord to record to record her parents, record some family/community history from them, and take lots of gorgeous nature photography of the fjords, over the course odf six seasons (winter-spring-summer-fall-winter-spring). There is a lot of beautiful footage, but the thing is if there’s one big shape after another big shape on flat screen nonstop you lose sense of scale. There’s no real sense of sequence or rhythm apart form seasons, so you don’t actual feel any size or majesty, it’s one image, another image, another imgage… It’s hard not to like her dad but ultimately his history and the history of the fjord aren’t too compellingly presented, either. Again, there’s no structure or sequence, it’s just stuff that’s said, so it’s just kind of another thing that doesn’t have much effect.
|
|
songstarliner
AV Clubber
i'm fine it's okay
Posts: 4,224
Member is Online
|
Post by songstarliner on Jun 8, 2024 21:42:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ron Howard Voice on Jun 9, 2024 9:30:05 GMT -5
It's almost a joke how unrelated the poster is to the actual movie. There is no definition of "on the take" that fits Veronica Lake in this movie and, although she's sexy, she does not dominate the plot the way she rules the poster. But I sympathize, because selling this movie must have been hard. Its plot is chaotic, constantly rising to false climaxes and then rebooting itself like a 1940s Groundhog Day. Its tone is broad comedy, but there's also a violent death and police brutality and an astonishing moment of real emotional power in a Black church. Preston Sturges was always stuffing a little too much into his movies, trying to add one subplot too many, or wringing out all your emotions on the way to the happy ending. In that way, Sullivan's Travels isn't just weird - it's kind of disorienting, postmodern. The Coen Brothers paid very famous tribute to this movie, which is appropriate, because this is kind of a pure Coen Brothers movie. The only way it could get more Coeny is if someone with a funny regional accent showed up to give bowling advice. Now that that general comment is out of the way...godDAMN does this movie work. It is not just mind-boggling, it's mind-bogglingly great. Sturges tries everything and everything works. The meta beginning is an incredible novelty, the comedy is still laugh-out-loud funny now, there's a pretty great chase scene, McCrea and Lake are practically smoldering with lust, and so many of the satirical targets are still worthy of targeting today. Wealthy liberal do-gooder patronizing, check. The casting couch, check. Incompetent police, check. Reality TV, somehow check even though it didn't exist. There's a line about Pittsburgh that's hard to forget once you've heard it, an all-time great visual joke (I laughed so hard at the reveal of the bus following Sullivan), some good ol' sound-effects-replacing-curse-words. Amazing blend of high and low comedy. Lake is on fire the whole time, and uhhh real hot when disguised as a boy. Joel McCrea, in my opinion the least charismatic leading man in Hollywood history*, transcends himself here, but I still watched him thinking about how late 80s Harrison Ford would have absolutely killed it. Three demerits, maybe. The famous "poverty montage" I could do without because montage. The very ending, with the flashback, is too on-the-nose sentimental, and creates a real ambiguity - this is a movie so opposed to sending a message that it...sends a message. And there's an early bit where an uncredited Black extra gets repeatedly humiliated and slammed into various cabinets. It works really well as pure slapstick, but the subtext is queasy for sure. Until you reach the near-ending, where the tables are turned and a Black church is about to welcome the white prisoners from the nearby prison camp into their congregation for movie night. The preacher - an authoritative, amazingly deep-voiced, scene-stealing, uncredited (ugh) Jess Lee Brooks - reminds his flock to treat the all-white prisoners with dignity because no matter how low they've fallen, they're still people too. That Black people were capable of the racial compassion that white people couldn't ever manage is an amazing message for a 1941-made movie to be sending. And then Sturges, who is not a visual director at all, comes up with the most amazing visual of his career. The camera is placed low down to the ground in the center of the aisle so that we watch the legs of the prisoners shuffling in...then we see the guards and their long, scary rifles...and then, as the rifles move to the side, we see Brooks, looking freaking powerful, leading his congregation in the final bars of "Go Down, Moses." Chills. But all in all, the amazing thing about this movie is that you can only love two or three of the things Sturges is trying to do, and still be blown away. *nominations please! I watched this over the weekend to kick off my annual Summer of Noirs. It didn't 100% work for me--I think it's the Hitchcock elements that you identified, whose filmography I struggle with and often find simplistic and uninvolving. Still, plenty to admire here. Nice to see Toronto's own Christopher Plummer get a meaty role during a low period in his career (same year as Starcrash). It was wild to look up the Ebert review and see just how low Plummer was at the time - Ebert praises him and says it's surprising because Plummer is usually boring! Imagine!
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jun 9, 2024 19:13:25 GMT -5
songstarliner It has been on my list for years and everyone who’s recommended it to me has highly, highly recommended it with the caveat that it’s heartbreaking, which is why probably why I just haven’t gotten around to it yet.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Jun 9, 2024 19:26:42 GMT -5
Anaria is a beautiful, heartbreaking movie. I have actually watched it twice over the last few years and I found the ending to be truly haunting.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Jun 9, 2024 22:45:36 GMT -5
White Lightning - 1973
and
Gator - 1976
What a difference three years can make. The only comparable tonal shift between a movie and it's sequel I can think of would be Evil Dead and Evil Dead 2. White Lightning, directed by Joseph Sargent, is a gritty, grim in places, crime movie of the rural south in 1973. Burt Reynolds is Gator McKlusky, a moonshine runner and car thief in prison with a year left on his sentence when his younger brother, a college student and "the only one in the family who ever really accomplished anything" is brutally murdered by corrupt redneck sheriff Ned Beatty. After a failed escape attempt, he volunteers to go undercover for the feds to get evidence against the sheriff. He knows this means he will also have to gather evidence against the everyday people of the area who struggle to survive by moonshining. This is "no mustache" Burt, and he acts the living shit out of his role. This movie absolutely nails the time and place of it's setting, Arkansas in 1973. Everybody is dirt poor. Nobody has air conditioning, Everybody is constantly soaked in sweat and you feel the heat and misery of the locals. There are bits of humor, and some pretty wild car chases, but nothing unreal. It's closer in atmosphere to Dirty Harry then Smoky and the Bandit. It's just a really good movie, and it proves that Reynolds was capable of a dramatic, nuanced, heartfelt performance when he put his mind to it.
Gator is Mustached Burt and was directed by him. It is pure "Cannonball Run II" style hokum. Where White Lightning was a gritty drama with moments of levity, everything here is a giggling joke. I haven't finished it, but may eventually. I know I saw it years ago. It isn't a bad movie as such, it just suffers in comparison to White Lightning. I understand completely while Reynolds took this route with the sequel, people were throwing buckets of money at him to be this smartass clown, and he ran with it. I just think he hamstrung his career by dragging out the jokes too long, till people either forgot or didn't care what a good actor he could be.
Another note: Both movies have really good supporting actors, and Ned Beatty is outstanding as the totally corrupt, totally evil redneck sheriff in White Lightning. The guy is terrifying. I could see a double feature of White Lightning and Deliverence to see not only two of Burt Reynolds best performances, but to see Ned Beatty as a truly evil redneck, and then be on the wrong side of a Truly Evil Redneck.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 10, 2024 8:44:13 GMT -5
Anaria is a beautiful, heartbreaking movie. I have actually watched it twice over the last few years and I found the ending to be truly haunting. BERGMAN...IN... SPACE!Yeah, I liked Aniara a lot. Sobering look at just how tied psychologically and spiritually we are to our planet and how quickly things would go to shit for a society adrift in the vacuum.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 10, 2024 10:42:58 GMT -5
Furiosa (2024) Time will tell, but at this point I think I might like a few aspects of it better than Fury Road. Where Fury Road is relatively stripped down, aesthetically, this one feels like a callback to the original three in their insane levels of detail in production/costume design and character quirks. As with everything George Miller, these are worlds that are lived in. Definitely much more CGI than the previous outing but it's not often distracting. Hemsworth and his minions ably bring the silliness, allowing Taylor-Joy's eyes and the other actors to not overwhelm the flick with excessive pathos. Despite the crack of the whip the film's getting right now, I think history's going to be kind to this one. I Bury the Living (1958) You'd never know it from his cartoonish performance as the Scottish groundskeeper (where have I seen that before?), but second-billed actor Theodore Bikel had an astonishing career. Originated the role of Captain Von Trapp on Broadway, appeared in The African Queen, nominated for an Academy Award for The Defiant Ones, and co-founded the Newport Folk Festival with Pete Seeger. Anyway, this is a poverty row-level horror production with a plot that would barely sustain a half-hour radio play but, surprisingly, the attempts at arty cinematography by Albert Band (father of Charles and Richard) work more often than not. Might be worth a look if you want to see how the '50s American grindhouse was assimilating Euro horror of the time.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Jun 10, 2024 14:19:21 GMT -5
Furiosa (2024) Time will tell, but at this point I think I might like a few aspects of it better than Fury Road. Where Fury Road is relatively stripped down, aesthetically, this one feels like a callback to the original three in their insane levels of detail in production/costume design and character quirks. As with everything George Miller, these are worlds that are lived in. Definitely much more CGI than the previous outing but it's not often distracting. Hemsworth and his minions ably bring the silliness, allowing Taylor-Joy's eyes and the other actors to not overwhelm the flick with excessive pathos. Despite the crack of the whip the film's getting right now, I think history's going to be kind to this one. I Bury the Living (1958) You'd never know it from his cartoonish performance as the Scottish groundskeeper (where have I seen that before?), but second-billed actor Theodore Bikel had an astonishing career. Originated the role of Captain Von Trapp on Broadway, appeared in The African Queen, nominated for an Academy Award for The Defiant Ones, and co-founded the Newport Folk Festival with Pete Seeger. Anyway, this is a poverty row-level horror production with a plot that would barely sustain a half-hour radio play but, surprisingly, the attempts at arty cinematography by Albert Band (father of Charles and Richard) work more often than not. Might be worth a look if you want to see how the '50s American grindhouse was assimilating Euro horror of the time. I remember Theodore Bikel from Frank Zappa's 200 Motels.
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Jun 10, 2024 16:12:01 GMT -5
Little Women 2019: C found this difficult to judge on its own terms because the 1994 adaptation (with Winona Ryder and Christian Bale) is her ultimate "sick day" movie and she's seen it so many times that she can't help but see it as the definitive version. I must have seen LW94 at least ten times at this point, but I think I was still was better equipped to appreciate the 2019 version for what it is. And I did! The direction is brisk and the dialogue and acting feel more...updated and naturalistic, but in way that's still respectful to the source material. The ending was a clever bit of having one's cake and eating it to, in terms of giving the audience what it wants versus giving Jo the ending she deserved. The non-linear narrative was...it didn't hurt the movie, but I don't think it really added anything new either. For one, "chop up the narrative" is probably #2 on the big list of "How to Adapt a Property That's Already Been Adapted 100 Times"--right behind #1: "set it in southern California." But also, relegating all of the childhood stuff to flashbacks makes it feel kind of weightless and less important relative to the narrative here-and-now, which is an odd choice when adapting a book that's all about growing up. It certainly lessens the punch of Beth's death when you know she's going to kick it from the start. Finally, sorry, but Florence Pugh's performance as a 12-year-old girl in the flashbacks is so singularly unconvincing that it took me right out of it whenever she showed up on screen. When you see a grown-ass woman in pigtails hanging out in a school room excitedly trading limes with actual child actors playing children your thought is less "ah, so the character is a tween" and more "oh, so she's...is she...special needs?" She's fine when she's playing an adult, but yeah, didn't work.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 11, 2024 9:19:47 GMT -5
Joel McCrea, in my opinion the least charismatic leading man in Hollywood history* *nominations please! Victor Mature I've seen him play lead in Kiss of Death and I Wake Up Screaming and will get around to Violent Saturday soon. I know noir characters often aren't supposed to be sympathetic but there are plenty of actors who can be compelling bastards. In those movies, Mature just comes off as a smarmy piece of shit or a whiny loser.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jun 12, 2024 2:15:52 GMT -5
Robot Dreams must be one of the cutest movies of all time. An anthropomorphic dog, Dog (living in a world or anthropomorphic animals) buys a robot as a friend, they immediately take to each other, but on a trip to the beach on the last day the beach is open the robot breaks down. After trying to retrieve the robot from the closed beach (and running afoul of the law for trying) Dog is forced to get through the next few months on his own while the robot’s stuck on the beach, with the movie being about their little experiences apart and dreams of each other.
That sounds like overload for a feature-length film, but the things that make it work are the fact that it’s dialog-free, its imagination (Dog lives on the Lower East Side in the 80s, which seems like it would be a bit too much but actually works really well—not just a fun era to illustrate but helps establish a sort of fantasy-distance), and an ending that’s touching without going the way you might expect it to. It’s like watching a great children’s book.
|
|
ABz B👹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,993
|
Post by ABz B👹anaz on Jun 14, 2024 10:08:09 GMT -5
Inside-Out 2 - Saw this with the family last night. Oh man, it's it spot-on with a lot of the emotions we're dealing with for BGirl right now. MrsB couldn't stop laughing early on. It was really sweet though, and funny. Maya Hawke was great as anxiety, and SO accurate to how that feels.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,690
|
Post by repulsionist on Jun 16, 2024 14:26:39 GMT -5
Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)
Though I remember where I was when I saw this as a 14 year-old, I did catch little hints and subtleties this watch through. Rooney hum-singing "Danke Schoen", for instance.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 17, 2024 9:40:15 GMT -5
Black sisters getting revenge on fools, the double feature. Sugar Hill (1974) Part of the AIP wave of horror Blaxploitation after Blacula and Black Frankenstein. Quite well made if not very authentically Black in feel, with a surprisingly wack theme song by The Originals. Still, Diana "Sugar" Hill gets some good-ass kills in retaliation for her man being stomped to death by the local crime syndicate, via a voodoo zombie army. The performance of Don Pedro Colley (who also co-wrote) as Baron Samedi is alone worth the price of admission. This is the one director credit of Paul Maslansky, who has a fairly remarkable stamp on film history, giving us everything from the Police Academy franchise (originated the concept and produced the bulk of them) to producing things like Death Line, Race with the Devil, and Return to Oz. Coffy (1973) A blind spot for me and oh so good. The goddess that is Pam Grier gives an astonishingly nuanced performance balancing badassery and gutting vulnerability. Also excellent is Booker Bradshaw as the embodiment of the Black community's uncomfortable relationship with upward mobility.
|
|
|
Post by chalkdevil 😈 on Jun 17, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
I had the house to myself all weekend and I watched some new movies: Hit Man (2024)This was okay. Glen Powell feels like the dude Hollywood is pushing so hard to be the next big thing and this is hear, I guess to help him show off his acting chops by getting to be different "hit man" characters. He does fine. His least convincing role is as the main character's true persona: a nerdy college philosophy professor who's really into birding. Like, I know they had him combs his hair dumb and wear jean shorts and baggy button up shirts (a throw back to 90s style that I think is supposed to make him look out of fashion but like, if he was 19, he'd be real fashionable), but the dude is handsome as hell and super in shape. If his nerdy quirk was being too into fitness instead of say birding, I'd get it, but still, real "take off glasses to become sexy" energy. I'd say the best thing about the film is Adria Arjona who is bringing some sexy, femme fatale energy that the film really needs. Otherwise, the whole thing is just too slack. If its tightened up a bit so the thing moves much quicker it be much more enjoyable. And maybe rework the ending. There's some dark shit going on in that ending that the film really doesn't really deal with properly. Monkey Man (2024)This was a fun one. Or, maybe not fun. It's a pretty serious movie for the most part. It's in the "one man beats the ever loving shit out of a whole building of people" genre that's all the rage with action movies. Probably more The Raid then John Wick, since guns are a good bit less present. But it hits all the tropes: man seeks revenge, faked action scene oners, so many disposable henchmen. But, Dev Patel was great, he looked great, his direction was there. Look forward to seeing what he does next (big money is on legacy sequel or super hero content). Late Night With The Devil (2024)I wanted to like this more than I did. It was decent enough, but I felt the film makers balked a bit at the execution. Meaning, the premise is that this is the master tape recording of a live late night tv show from 1977 in which spooky shit happens. Except when it isn't. When they have entirely too much coverage and quick editing for a live 70s talk show. When they go on break and I guess there's a documentary crew with something like 10 cameras filming private conversations with perfect sound recording like it's an episode of The Office. And then the end, when I guess it's just sort of a fuck it, premise be damned kind of thing. For me, it took me out of it and it needed to go harder in either direction. Either it's fully the studio cameras or you just use the tv show footage sporadically and otherwise you've got a Larry Sanders Show thing happening. And the cheap CGI sucked. Make it practical. At least it fits with the 70s vibes. Furiosa (2024)I got out to the theater for this one and was happy I did. It was pretty great. Not sure if it was Fury Road great, but pretty damn close. It certainly fleshed out the world more, which was amazing to see. Some highlights include: - Chris Hemsworth as weird a charismatic warlord. Hell yeah, do more of that.
- The actor they got to play young Furiosa looked so much like Anya Taylor-Joy that I was kind of unsure when they actually switched actresses.
- Anya Taylor-Joy was great, too. This time she got to do the quietly brooding thing and did a great job.
Overall, super happy with this. My only real quibbles were when the movie tries too hard to throw nods to Fury Road with (mild spoilers): a shot of Max watching young Furiosa from a distance (why?), the weird deep fake on The Bullet Farmer (I see that the actor died a few years ago, but really, was he so essential that he just couldn't be recast with a different old Aussie dude?), and closing out the movie with clips from Fury Road. Again, why? Still, those are minor and the movie is great. Bummed it didn't do well. Would have loved to see a Warlord Furiosa to close out the trilogy.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jun 17, 2024 18:20:29 GMT -5
chalkdevil 😈 I think Hit Man was in part Powell’s baby, so it might be in part a case of him having enough clout to get things done too. I enjoyed it a lot, it doesn’t hold up to too much scrutiny at all and that’s fine, and I agree that as good as Powell’s acting was his looks worked against him. You need a quirky guy who you recognize is actually quite attractive if he presents himself a bit differently, a 70s casting move rather than Powell’s 90s teen comedy hero look. I can see where Miller was coming from with Max—he’s disconnected, only concerned with his own survival, not really interested in any kind of larger moral duty to the world, and Fury Road’s about him getting past all of that. I completely agree it wasn’t necessary and was distracting, though, and made the world of Mad Max, which seemed to get bigger even if we were largely recvisiting places we’d already been, smaller.
|
|
|
Post by WKRP Jimmy Drop on Jun 17, 2024 22:16:12 GMT -5
Fellowship of the Ring extended version theater release, baby!
The showing was in a smaller theater, and there were maybe ten of us. Obviously I hadn’t seen it on such a huge screen in some time, so I caught a lot of little details (costume & set design mostly). It was very nice, reclining seats and all, and of course since I’ve seen it a million times, so I could run out any time I needed to. I hadn’t actually cried over Boromir in YEARS but that big ol screen did it.
Although weirdly I didn’t see anyone I knew, which I half expected to, but it was showing at other locations around town. Not sure I’ll be able to catch the other two, though.
|
|
|
Post by WKRP Jimmy Drop on Jun 17, 2024 23:14:28 GMT -5
Little Women 2019: C found this difficult to judge on its own terms because the 1994 adaptation (with Winona Ryder and Christian Bale) is her ultimate "sick day" movie and she's seen it so many times that she can't help but see it as the definitive version. I must have seen LW94 at least ten times at this point, but I think I was still was better equipped to appreciate the 2019 version for what it is. And I did! The direction is brisk and the dialogue and acting feel more...updated and naturalistic, but in way that's still respectful to the source material. The ending was a clever bit of having one's cake and eating it to, in terms of giving the audience what it wants versus giving Jo the ending she deserved. The non-linear narrative was...it didn't hurt the movie, but I don't think it really added anything new either. For one, "chop up the narrative" is probably #2 on the big list of "How to Adapt a Property That's Already Been Adapted 100 Times"--right behind #1: "set it in southern California." But also, relegating all of the childhood stuff to flashbacks makes it feel kind of weightless and less important relative to the narrative here-and-now, which is an odd choice when adapting a book that's all about growing up. It certainly lessens the punch of Beth's death when you know she's going to kick it from the start. Finally, sorry, but Florence Pugh's performance as a 12-year-old girl in the flashbacks is so singularly unconvincing that it took me right out of it whenever she showed up on screen. When you see a grown-ass woman in pigtails hanging out in a school room excitedly trading limes with actual child actors playing children your thought is less "ah, so the character is a tween" and more "oh, so she's...is she... special needs?" She's fine when she's playing an adult, but yeah, didn't work. I’ve read it countless times since I was very young;I like the Winona Ryder version, but I’m not super attached to it, and I had issues this version. I agree that Pugh as a 12-year-old was idiotic, but otherwise she was fine, and most of the casting was good as well (although Odenkirk as a Civi War era dude was pretty jarring ymmv)(well Laura Dern as Marmee was jarring as well but because in my head she’s not old enough to have four girls of any age). And I was impressed with Chalamet - he was honestly a great Laurie. However, between deciding Amy was in love with Laurie all her life, and making Bhaer a pretty boy basically Jo’s age, I must assume that Greta Gerwig read a different book than I did. I’ve never had any problem with Jo not ending up with Laurie; they would have been a complete disaster as a married couple and would have ended up utterly miserable. No matter how good Laurie’s intentions, he’d end up expecting her to be a Laurence/society wife, and that is absolutely not a role Jo could fill, or would want to fill. Bhaer was exactly what Jo needed; someone laid back, older enough to have realized societal expectations aren’t that important, who has no societal position to uphold, and very little concern about her checking all the boxes on the Standard Wife list (and in the book he’s also very onboard the Transcendentalism/New England piety train)(well it’s more obvious in Little Men tbh). My iPad is about to die so tune in next time when I go on a tear about People Who Are Mad Eowyn Gave Up War.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 18, 2024 6:39:54 GMT -5
I can see where Miller was coming from with Max—he’s disconnected, only concerned with his own survival, not really interested in any kind of larger moral duty to the world, and Fury Road’s about him getting past all of that. I completely agree it wasn’t necessary and was distracting, though, and made the world of Mad Max, which seemed to get bigger even if we were largely recvisiting places we’d already been, smaller. Probably the biggest sin of Beyond Thunderdome (still the worst of the Max movies) is that he's too engaged with helping the orphans. It doesn't fit the character at all.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Jun 18, 2024 6:43:57 GMT -5
Furiosa (2024)- The actor they got to play young Furiosa looked so much like Anya Taylor-Joy that I was kind of unsure when they actually switched actresses.
They digitally altered the young actor's face to look like Taylor-Joy.
|
|
|
Post by chalkdevil 😈 on Jun 18, 2024 8:53:00 GMT -5
Furiosa (2024)- The actor they got to play young Furiosa looked so much like Anya Taylor-Joy that I was kind of unsure when they actually switched actresses.
They digitally altered the young actor's face to look like Taylor-Joy. I just saw that. It was well done, I didn't notice the CGI on the young actor's face. Maybe it helped that she doesn't really talk. That shit always gets weird when they have to talk.
|
|