|
Post by Desert Dweller on Jun 4, 2016 21:38:58 GMT -5
Sure! I'll nominate them for the next round.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jun 4, 2016 22:04:59 GMT -5
When does your current list finish by, Hippo?
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 4, 2016 22:23:45 GMT -5
Sure! I'll nominate them for the next round. Consider them nominated!
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 4, 2016 22:24:21 GMT -5
When does your current list finish by, Hippo? Mid to late September.
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 7, 2016 23:52:01 GMT -5
For this week, we're taking a trip back to the woodlands with the squirrel.
Squirrels are a giant group of mid-size rodents, numbering some 285 species in total. Within their group alongside the tree squirrel which I'll be covering here (specifically the Sciurus genus) are chipmunks, marmots and prairie dogs. Their range spans across the northern hemisphere continents down into Africa and South America with a few species introduced into Australia. Sizes of squirrels in general vary from the tiny pygmy squirrel which is all of 10 cm long upto the Oriental giant squirrels which are about as big as a cat. Within the genus Sciurus that the tree squirrels belong to, there's 30 species in total. Their collective nouns are either a scurry or a drey, scurry is of course the right option for the alliteration alone. Size-wise, the tree squirrels range from the small like the Amazon red squirrels upto the big like the Eastern fox squirrel. Rough median, they're 20cm long with most of that tail and weighing around 300-400g. Mortality for squirrels is scary high with most biting it before they're a year old, if they can make it past that then they can expect 5-10 more years in the wild with around five more if in captivity. The squirrel is very much a day animal, while nuts and seeds make up the majority of their diet they are classed as omnivores due to their tendency to eat bugs and smaller rodents and small birds with some species going to a fully bug based diet. Their tails are used much like the snow leopards' are, for balance when jumping and moving about and also as insulation against the cold where coldness is an issue while sleeping. They also have a unique ability to move down trees headfirst due to rotatable hind ankles which can turn upto 180 degrees to help with gripping the bark with their super sharp claws. Could you adopt one of these fluffy-fluffs? Possibly, like mentioned above they have very sharp claws and are basically very small, very mean cats. They require a lot of upkeep, things will be destroyed and generally they aren't to the level of domestication required to make them viable pets because they haven't been bred to be... yet. It's a bad idea, don't do it and don't let this gif tell you you can.
Please help yourself to these pics of these nice little creatures even if they have bitten through cables when you didn't want them to.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jun 8, 2016 0:20:16 GMT -5
Look at that face. Life is confusing and hard! It doesn't have all the answers! It's just trying to do its best! Here's the Indian giant squirrel you mentioned. Do we know what squirrel-chipmunk relations are like if they exist?
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,083
|
Post by moimoi on Jun 8, 2016 0:40:50 GMT -5
Very nice job with the gifs, Hippo the Slothy Sloth! I would also like to know the relationship between tree squirrels and ground squirrels - do they typically live in the same habitat or are they mutually exclusive?
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 8, 2016 0:51:00 GMT -5
Do we know what squirrel-chipmunk relations are like if they exist? They don't really exist, both do things on land and in trees but chipmunks are burrowers so there's a bit of delineation. Following on from moimoi 's related question, their paths don't often cross, they can be in similar places after similar foods but because of their living arrangements, it's not such a big deal as there's usually enough food to make sure they don't really come into conflict.
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Jun 8, 2016 20:49:08 GMT -5
I'm surprised by the different varieties of squirrel.
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,083
|
Post by moimoi on Jun 8, 2016 20:53:01 GMT -5
silly buns - indeed! The Giant Indian squirrel is as colorful as his homeland
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Jun 8, 2016 20:53:48 GMT -5
There's a cat sized squirrel!
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,083
|
Post by moimoi on Jun 8, 2016 21:05:10 GMT -5
There's a cat sized squirrel! Those brushy ears are EVERYTHING!
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 11, 2016 8:12:05 GMT -5
SKWIRLS!!The earliest squirrel fossil, Douglassciurus jeffersoni is from the late Eocene and early Oligocene (38 - 33 million years ago) of North America. Although its skull lacks some of the features that today define the Sciurids, the rest of its skeleton is almost identical to a modern fox squirrel. So it seems the earliest squirrels were tree squirrels and all the ground squirrels, chipmunks, prairie dogs, marmots, woodchucks and even flying squirrels came later. This kinda makes sense, as grasslands weren't actually a thing until the late Oligocene. Many years ago, I was almost hired to work a summer on a project studying red squirrels in the boreal forest of Northern Alberta. Unfortunately, the head of the project was a master at finding funding to give his students a decent wage. Normally this would have been great, but the way he did it was to tie his hirings to a Federal jobs creation program that required that you be eligible for unemployment insurance - and being a student with no job at the time, I didn't qualify. Anyhow, I wound up volunteering to help with the project and so got to spend a few weekends climbing gigantic lodgepole pines in search of squirrel nests. In retrospect, we did not receive nearly enough safety training to do what we were doing, but none of us died, so I guess it worked out. Basically, we'd climb into the trees and count how many baby squirrels there were in the nests. Newly born squirrel babies are helpless, and nicknamed pinkies. They're basically like squirmy jelly-beans. My favourite stage is the next one, though. They start getting fur, and are quite a bit more mobile, but are still too helpless to leave the nest. When the nest is disturbed, rather than being a completely helpless meal, their first instinct is to start climbing. They will shoot up the nearest branch or branch-equivalent like lightning, and keep climbing until they reach the top. Then they stop and sit very, very still. In the tree, this generally puts them out on very thin twigs and shoots, where predators like pine martens and even other squirrels can't reach. Then they wait for mom to rescue them. When they're in your hand, this gives you a little finger buddy! Skwirl finger buddy!
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 11, 2016 8:16:42 GMT -5
I was thinking "hey, where's haysoos and his fossil based facts and more recent anecdotes?" just a minute ago too!
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 11, 2016 8:22:00 GMT -5
I was thinking "hey, where's haysoos and his fossil based facts and more recent anecdotes?" just a minute ago too! Yeah, it's been crazy busy at work lately. I've had to come to the TI on my own time. Pure madness, I tell you.
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 14, 2016 23:22:33 GMT -5
Off we go this week to go visit the giant tortoises of the Galapagos, as requested by songstarliner .
The Galapagos giant tortoise is resident specifically to the islands of the Galapagos, a small archipelago of islands in the Pacific Ocean just west of Ecuador which it is a province. Currently, there's somewhere over 20,000 members of the Galapagos tortoise which is up from around 3,000 in the 1970s, this is due to intense conservation efforts to keep this unique species of tortoise alive though it is still classed as vulnerable as an assessment of their numbers and status hasn't been done since 1994. As is known, giant tortoises live for a very long time with many living for over 100 years in the wild with some tortoises who lived for roughly 170 years in captivity. Their sizes are also large with them weighing 200kg on average and a length of 1.25 metres. Many of the subspecies of giant tortoise are unique to each island, mostly determined by shell shape and adaptations across time to the local environment. Being tortoises, their diet is herbivorous taking in cacti, leaves, berries and grasses alongside guavas and prickly pears. Most of the water intake is derived from dew and saps in the plants they eat and due to that can survive for up to six months without water and up to a year if neither food nor water can be found or simply not given to them because they're on a boat. I mention being on boats in the last fact because they were often swiped from the islands and stored on board ships in the 1700s due to their usefulness for meat, oil and the water they store in their necks. A surprising amount was written by explorers of the time about just how delicious these big ol' things were, Charles Darwin didn't much appreciate the meat but he was probably just a grumpus about not seeing any alive for study. Much of their endangerment early on came from being stolen away to live and eventually die on ships during the 18th and 19th centuries in huge numbers because of the whole "really good meat, oil and occasional potable water store" thing they had going. The only thing that really saved them was a drop in interest in their by-products with the advent of crude oil, there was also the threat of invasive species from outside who ate tortoise eggs and destroyed their grazing and nesting sites. Good news for this dodo-to-may-be though as recent conservation efforts have had their numbers rebound and now they're heavily protected though you still get a few poached here and there. Being gigantic (and endangered) things, you'd be better off finding a regular old tortoise and getting a terrarium.
So, say hi to these wonderful relics of a long-gone prehistoric past and remember that every one of the adults has outlived you.
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,083
|
Post by moimoi on Jun 14, 2016 23:48:48 GMT -5
Hooray! I love this post! It's my spirit animal, you know:
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 15, 2016 14:17:14 GMT -5
There were three different lineages of giant tortoises, restricted to different island chains.
The Galapagos tortoises, descendants of smaller tortoises from South America are still found on islands off the coast of Equador.
The Aldabaran giant tortoise is today found only on the island atoll of Aldabara in the Indian Ocean, but there were tortoises throughout the Seychelles. These are likely descendants of tortoises from Madagascar (which had its own giant tortoise until about the 13th century).
The third lineage, the Mascarenes giant tortoises consisted of at least five species on the islands of Mauritius, Rodrigues, and Reunion. Sharp eyed viewers may recognize these as the same islands as the dodo once frequented, and they went extinct at about the same time (1730s) for the same reasons. The Mascarenes tortoises were unusual in that in the absence of predators, their shells became very thin - only about 1 mm thick.
There were other giant tortoises as well, scattered about through the geologic record. There's a giant tortoise from Florida found in a sinkhole with a spear right through it dated at about 12,000 years old. There were also huge tortoises in California, and a species known as Titanochelon that lived in western Europe and into Asia between 20 and 2 million years ago that was up to 7 feet long.
Meiolania, a horned tortoise with thorn-like spikes on its tail lived in Australia and nearby islands from about 25 million years ago until the last population was likely hunted to extinction about 2000 years ago on New Caledonia. They were up to 8 feet long, and probably weighed about a ton. It had a smaller relative (only about 500 lbs) named Ninjemys, named after the teenaged heroes on a half-shell of American mythology.
Of similar size to Meiolania was Megalochelys atlas, which roamed from Pakistan down through Indonesia to Timor between about 15 million years to 2 million years ago. At least humans probably didn't have anything to do with that extinction.
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 22, 2016 1:12:11 GMT -5
This week's animal of facts is the aardvark, the first animal at least alphabetically!
Aardvarks live in Africa across much of the continent but stopping short of the arid northern countries. They're a burrower type of mammal and not actually endangered though actual numbers are fuzzy given how uncommon they are. As a burrowing undergrounder, the aardvark is an insectivore taking in mostly ants and termites but also a fruit called the aardvark cucumber, so called as aardvarks are the only ones to eat them to the point the plant depends upon being eaten to continue surviving. Though vaguely pig-like, there's no pig in the aardvark even if its name is Afrikaans for "earth pig" nor is it any bit related to the similar anteater. It uses its nose to go sniffing out food in the night being a nocturnal creature, much of how it finds food is also due to their keen sense of hearing. Their hearing is also critical to keeping them alive and not being eaten by leopards, hyenas, snakes or tigers. If they're attacked they usually will dig their way out very rapidly (sometimes upto a metre in five minutes) or simply run away from the danger, really taking the whole "zig-zag to make yourself harder to hit" to heart in both strategies. If an offensive attack is needed they'll take to smacking their attacker about with their tail or limbs and if it really gets hairy they'll lay on their back and claw at them, usually very effective. Aardvarks aren't on the big size, weighting around 70kg and measuring around 1.5-2.0m taking in their tails. Their average lifespan is around 20 years in captivity, shorter out in the wilds. Would they be any good as a pet? No. Finally, the aardvarks are a curious species being classed as a living fossil and being so different from anything else it's off away on its own taxon, their closest actual relatives are shrews and moles.
As usual we have pics as we say bye to these wonderful relics of a long-gone prehistoric past... that does sound familiar.. also, there's very few pics out there and it gets weird and gamey rather quick on GIS.
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,083
|
Post by moimoi on Jun 22, 2016 1:23:26 GMT -5
My first thought upon seeing this entry: ...and now my day is made
|
|
|
Post by 🔪 silly buns on Jun 22, 2016 8:03:39 GMT -5
They are a peculiar looking creature. I would not want to get a smack attack from an aardvark.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 22, 2016 8:47:29 GMT -5
The systematic and phylogenetic relationships of aardvarks have long puzzled biologists. Until the advent of modern genetic analysis, the only thing they had to go on was anatomical similarities between different groups, and in mammals this generally means teeth. Lots and lots of looking at the cusps, bumps, crests, hypoconulids, folds, creases, spacing and numbers of teeth. Then comparing them with fossil teeth. This becomes very difficult in mammals that through evolutionary specialization have lost their teeth.
Aardvarks aren't completely toothless, but their teeth are few in number, and modified into weird tubes of hard enamel with ribbons of dentene - unlike anything in any other mammal group. Originally, this led to them being lumped with the South American anteaters and the pangolins into a group known as the Edentates, despite obvious problems with biogeography and even post-cranial skeletal anatomy. That grouping is now known as being totally erroneous, but few alternatives have really been satisfying either. They were stuck with the elephants and hyrax for a while, on the basis that they were all kinda primitive (plesiomorphic), but that didn't really mean anything other than each of the groups hadn't really changed much in a long, long time.
Today, molecular data suggests that they are within a group known as the Afrotheria. The Afrotheria also includes sengis (elephant-shrews), golden-moles, tenrecs (last seen in our discussion about hedgehogs), as well as elephants, hyrax and sirenians (eg. manatees). Where they fit into this group is still unclear.
The fossil aardvarks found to date don't really clear matters up much. They are not plentiful, and either have very similar teeth to the modern forms, or are completely missing their skulls or teeth.
The fossils themselves are pretty interesting though. They are found as far afield as France, Greece and Pakistan so it appears they were rather more widespread in the past. They first appear in the Miocene, about 23 million years ago - and this is also their period of greatest diversity and range.
There is even a fossil species very similar to an aardvark found on Madasgascar. Unfortunately, this is one of those that is missing its teeth, so it's really unclear about its phylogenetic affinity. It appears that it may actually be more closely related to the tenrecs found on the island, having developed aardvark characteristics through convergent evolution. Those tenrecs are a weird group.
In mythology, the Egyptian god of deserts, storms, violence, and disorder who killed Osiris and usurped his throne was often depicted with aardvark features until he became more donkey-headed in the Late Period. Cerebus the Aardvark, of the comic series Cerebus started out as a parody of sword-and-sorcery heroic fantasy, but became more serious over time. During its heyday, Cerebus was cited as inspirational by Alan Moore, and certainly influenced the development of the Teenaged Mutant Ninja Turtles. The later issues devolved into a weird anti-feminist platform for the unusual religious beliefs its author developed, but it remains very important in comics history.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Jun 23, 2016 1:20:30 GMT -5
In mythology, the Egyptian god of deserts, storms, violence, and disorder who killed Osiris and usurped his throne was often depicted with aardvark features until he became more donkey-headed in the Late Period. The Egyptian God Set has very unusual features. It is very strange that the Egyptians would depict him in a form that did not resemble any real animal. He definitely seems to have the snout and ears of an aardvark. But, the body is more canine. It is strange to me that it morphed into being more portrayed as a donkey in later years. The earlier depictions look much more like a combo aardvark/jackal. I'm not really sure how they got donkey out of that. Set looks way cooler as a weird aardvark hybrid animal than he does as a donkey.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 23, 2016 7:46:52 GMT -5
In mythology, the Egyptian god of deserts, storms, violence, and disorder who killed Osiris and usurped his throne was often depicted with aardvark features until he became more donkey-headed in the Late Period. The Egyptian God Set has very unusual features. It is very strange that the Egyptians would depict him in a form that did not resemble any real animal. He definitely seems to have the snout and ears of an aardvark. But, the body is more canine. It is strange to me that it morphed into being more portrayed as a donkey in later years. The earlier depictions look much more like a combo aardvark/jackal. I'm not really sure how they got donkey out of that. Set looks way cooler as a weird aardvark hybrid animal than he does as a donkey. I've often wondered, as one will, if whether during the Old Kingdom aardvarks were rather more common in Egypt than they are today. There was a period of extreme drought, known as the 4.2 kya Event that occurred around 2200 BCE (or 4.2 thousand years ago). It brought an end to the Old Kingdom of Egypt, the Akkadians, the Umm-An Nar of the Persian Gulf, the Longshan and other Neolithic cultures in China. It's quite possible that during this period, aardvarks were extirpated from much of Egypt. If so, then later sculptors working on depictions of Set may not have known what kind of critter they were trying to carve, and over time it kind of settled on "donkey" as their best guess as to what the heck that thing was. Of course, I have no actual evidence or anything to support this hypothesis, but it would be interesting if it were true.
|
|
|
Post by Sanziana on Jun 23, 2016 12:51:46 GMT -5
Aardvark sounds like an Icelandic heavy-metal band.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Jun 24, 2016 22:54:14 GMT -5
The Egyptian God Set has very unusual features. It is very strange that the Egyptians would depict him in a form that did not resemble any real animal. He definitely seems to have the snout and ears of an aardvark. But, the body is more canine. It is strange to me that it morphed into being more portrayed as a donkey in later years. The earlier depictions look much more like a combo aardvark/jackal. I'm not really sure how they got donkey out of that. Set looks way cooler as a weird aardvark hybrid animal than he does as a donkey. I've often wondered, as one will, if whether during the Old Kingdom aardvarks were rather more common in Egypt than they are today. There was a period of extreme drought, known as the 4.2 kya Event that occurred around 2200 BCE (or 4.2 thousand years ago). It brought an end to the Old Kingdom of Egypt, the Akkadians, the Umm-An Nar of the Persian Gulf, the Longshan and other Neolithic cultures in China. It's quite possible that during this period, aardvarks were extirpated from much of Egypt. If so, then later sculptors working on depictions of Set may not have known what kind of critter they were trying to carve, and over time it kind of settled on "donkey" as their best guess as to what the heck that thing was. Of course, I have no actual evidence or anything to support this hypothesis, but it would be interesting if it were true. Seems a decent hypothesis to me. I took a lot of classes about Ancient Egypt while I was in college. It wasn't related to my major whatsoever, but I found that culture and time period to be fascinating to study.
|
|
Hippo
Prolific Poster
Posts: 6,739
|
Post by Hippo on Jun 28, 2016 23:28:42 GMT -5
It's Shark Week this week and as such we're looking towards the sharks of the oceans, sharks, as requested by @cub ! By the end of this, "shark" will just be a noise lacking meaning.
Sharks are a type of fish that have managed over their 420 million year existence to number some 512 species spread across eight orders and come in an array of sizes the tiny dwarf lanternshark measuring 17 cm right up the whale shark who comes in at a huge 12 metres. They can be found in any sea across the world and a few species have adapted to freshwater surroundings. Many of the most well known species are known due to their position as apex predators and generally humans have a somewhat mixed viewpoint on these fishies depending when and who you ask. The main navigational means for sharks is through smell, some highly sensitive to blood as well as an incredibly keen sense of hearing and one of the only animals which use electroreception alongside echidnas and dolphins. Generally, sharks have a highly variable lifespan with some living beyond 100 years on average with most just getting in between 20 and 30 years of life. Because of their huge species array covering all the possible environments on earth, their reproduction cycle is also interestingly varied; some lay eggs, some have a near mammalian birth while others merely have a more standard placental fish birth. The diet of the shark is predominantly going to be fish bar a few exceptions which have taken to filter feeding on plankton and smaller fish. Everyone else will survive on what's near such as fish, octopodes, eels and various other animals. Just going to draw attention to the goblin shark being a creepy mofo here, around 3 metres long though often much longer and live deep in the depths of the ocean. Rarely sighted, what makes them creepy isn't their appearance but their ability to extend their mouths out to a degree that makes eating real easy but also looks downright nightmarish. Shark teeth are bizarre; they sit in the gums and not within the jawbone, they are constantly being replaced in a near constant cycle of renewal hence there being two rows of teeth, the back ones are to replace the front ones. A given shark will replace its teeth at differing rates, some as quick as within a week with others taking months to be replaced and a shark will go through in excess of 10,000 teeth across its lifetime. Are sharks endangered, some are and yes, it's good ol' anthropogenic endangerment! Most are being killed for their meat, shark fin being one of the particular concerns given black market trading in the fins for use as status symbols and as old fashioned medicine to treat osteoarthritis and cancer. Generally, do not own a shark, they can grow to be huge and are often difficult to manage.
To conclude, here's some vicious sharp toothed fish pics!
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jun 28, 2016 23:52:57 GMT -5
Sharks are among my favorite life-forms, Hippo—beautiful and fascinating. Many thanks for the pictures—I’ve been under a lot of stress lately and this helped make my evening.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 29, 2016 8:30:29 GMT -5
Sharks have such a vast fossil history it's difficult to even know where to begin. Most shark fossils consist of teeth. This is true for most vertebrate groups, but multiply so for sharks. Most of their skeleton is cartilage, so rarely gets preserved. Meanwhile, each shark has hundreds of teeth, which are constantly being shed, lost, dropped or broken. An individual shark can go through tens of thousands of teeth in their lifetime, most of which drop down into quiet sandy or muddy ocean bottom - making each of them a good candidate for fossil preservation. Unfortunately, shark teeth aren't quite as distinctive as mammal teeth. The teeth in a shark's jaw vary in size, shape and configuration from side to side, from bottom jaw to top jaw, and even within an individual whorl. They also change quite a bit over the lifetime of the shark, and even between male and female sharks. So telling exactly what species of shark a tooth came from is not easy, and using them as the sole criterion to classify a species is really, really difficult. So a shark tooth has to be pretty distinctive to be useful taxonomically. Because sharks are so diverse, there are indeed some pretty distinctive shark teeth out there. This is a tooth from Carcharodon megalodon, often just known as Megalodon. It is essentially a gigantic Great White ( Carcharodon carcharias) that lived between 23-2.6 million years ago. It is possibly the largest predator that ever lived; estimated at between 15-20 m long, and 50-100 tonnes in weight. This is the tooth array of Helicoprion (actually more closely related to chimera and rat-fish than to modern sharks). Helicoprion lived back in the Permian, through to the Triassic (290-250 mya) - going extinct just as the dinosaurs were getting started on land. They were about 3 m long, but one huge tooth whorl from Idaho suggests they could have reached about 12 m in length. Although its teeth were relatively normal, Stethacanthus (380-320 mya) is notable for that weird, anvil-shaped projection. They were pretty small, only about 1 m long. Even weirder than the anvil projection are the little brush and scraper denticles on the forehead and fin there. There is some evidence that suggests the fin part was inflatable - maybe blowing up like a blowfish puppet. This might have been used to scare away predators. It also appears the anvil and brush only appear on mature males, suggesting it was probably a mating thing. How it was used is left as an exercise for the reader's imagination.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Jun 30, 2016 1:55:10 GMT -5
I love the whale shark! That is a beautiful fish. Love the markings.
|
|