|
Post by Lord Lucan on Feb 15, 2018 22:05:29 GMT -5
I was entirely oblivious to it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 7:25:29 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 8:17:35 GMT -5
French girl, 11, is 'not a child' lawyers for 29-year-old man accused of sex abuse sayThe case has reignited a fierce debate on the age of sexual consent in France. France does not have a legal age under which a minor cannot agree to a sexual relationship. But the country's top court has ruled that children aged five and under cannot consent.
French law defines rape as sexual penetration committed "by violence, coercion, threat or surprise." Last year, French courts twice refused to prosecute men for the alleged rape of 11-year-old girls because prosecutors would not be able to prove coercion.
The French government is currently drafting a bill to say that sex with children under a certain age is by definition coercive.
|
|
fab
TI Forumite
strange days
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by fab on Feb 20, 2018 8:28:34 GMT -5
what the fuck, France.
also, Julian Assange may be the biggest shitlord this world has ever seen. :/
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Feb 20, 2018 17:28:54 GMT -5
I haven't thought about Dennis Kucinich since he was the anti-Iraq war primary candidate in 2004. I'm disappointed to find out he's a bit crazy now, but I would have had to been watching Fox News to know he's a regular there.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Feb 26, 2018 13:28:28 GMT -5
Oral arguments for Janus v. AFSCME were this morning. It's probably the final death knell for unions in this country; this case will determine whether non-union employees have to pay union dues. When it is decided 5-4 that they don't, the non-members will stop paying, the squishy fringe will also decide they can get the benefits of bargaining without membership, and union funds will ultimately be cut in half.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Feb 27, 2018 0:52:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 27, 2018 1:02:49 GMT -5
Oral arguments for Janus v. AFSCME were this morning. It's probably the final death knell for unions in this country; this case will determine whether non-union employees have to pay union dues. When it is decided 5-4 that they don't, the non-members will stop paying, the squishy fringe will also decide they can get the benefits of bargaining without membership, and union funds will ultimately be cut in half. Well, it's the death knell for public unions in this country at least. What's fucking infuriating though is all the media outlets who are like "This one all hinges on the newest SCOTUS justice Neil Gorsuch, who was strangely silent throughout oral arguments." Yeah, NPR, we're all fucking wondering which way Neil Gorsuch is going to go on this case.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 27, 2018 1:20:26 GMT -5
Wow, I guess A.A. Milne's fiction was more prescient than I'd given it credit for.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Feb 27, 2018 1:46:23 GMT -5
Okay this one’s actually from China:
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Greene's October Surprise on Feb 27, 2018 5:08:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Feb 28, 2018 23:48:07 GMT -5
Do you think we'll ever have another U.S. president who served in the military? I don't mean the Texas Air National Guard, I mean a veteran or someone who at least had a foreign station.
Every postwar, 20th century Republican president was a veteran except for that dodger Reagan. The Republicans (the party that claims to most revere the military) nominated an actual veteran for president from 1988 to 2008, except for the legacy son of a veteran president. The chickenhawks and rich men took over in the 21st century, with the exception of John McCain. On the Democratic side, in the past thirty years we've had Dukakis and Kerry who served, a deferment, a young guy, and a woman.
President Bone Spurs is the last candidate we'll ever see who was eligible for a draft. Future candidates are going to be younger and more likely female, and we're some time away from Iraq/Afghanistan vets being of presidential age. Most importantly, military service is no longer a gateway to a political career the way it was for most of the country's history. With no draft, the rich/accomplished people who become president are less likely to have volunteered.
Democrats don't nominate generals. The last time anyone flirted with that idea was Wes Clark. If it happens, it has to come from Republicans. Carter was the last Democrat to serve in both the military and as president, so I don't know what kind of influence the experience might have on, say, foreign policy positions.
|
|
|
Post by nowimnothing on Mar 1, 2018 9:34:31 GMT -5
Do you think we'll ever have another U.S. president who served in the military? I don't mean the Texas Air National Guard, I mean a veteran or someone who at least had a foreign station. Every postwar, 20th century Republican president was a veteran except for that dodger Reagan. The Republicans (the party that claims to most revere the military) nominated an actual veteran for president from 1988 to 2008, except for the legacy son of a veteran president. The chickenhawks and rich men took over in the 21st century, with the exception of John McCain. On the Democratic side, in the past thirty years we've had Dukakis and Kerry who served, a deferment, a young guy, and a woman. President Bone Spurs is the last candidate we'll ever see who was eligible for a draft. Future candidates are going to be younger and more likely female, and we're some time away from Iraq/Afghanistan vets being of presidential age. Most importantly, military service is no longer a gateway to a political career the way it was for most of the country's history. With no draft, the rich/accomplished people who become president are less likely to have volunteered. Democrats don't nominate generals. The last time anyone flirted with that idea was Wes Clark. If it happens, it has to come from Republicans. Carter was the last Democrat to serve in both the military and as president, so I don't know what kind of influence the experience might have on, say, foreign policy positions. I still think there is a lot of fetishization of the military on our country on both sides so I would not rule it out. It may not be a gateway, but it does give a certain cache to their political goals. Much more so than just being a lawyer or something. Tammy Duckworth might be good example on the D side. Not saying it would be her running, but I could see someone like that getting the D nomination.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 1, 2018 9:51:36 GMT -5
Do you think we'll ever have another U.S. president who served in the military? I don't mean the Texas Air National Guard, I mean a veteran or someone who at least had a foreign station. Every postwar, 20th century Republican president was a veteran except for that dodger Reagan. The Republicans (the party that claims to most revere the military) nominated an actual veteran for president from 1988 to 2008, except for the legacy son of a veteran president. The chickenhawks and rich men took over in the 21st century, with the exception of John McCain. On the Democratic side, in the past thirty years we've had Dukakis and Kerry who served, a deferment, a young guy, and a woman. President Bone Spurs is the last candidate we'll ever see who was eligible for a draft. Future candidates are going to be younger and more likely female, and we're some time away from Iraq/Afghanistan vets being of presidential age. Most importantly, military service is no longer a gateway to a political career the way it was for most of the country's history. With no draft, the rich/accomplished people who become president are less likely to have volunteered. Democrats don't nominate generals. The last time anyone flirted with that idea was Wes Clark. If it happens, it has to come from Republicans. Carter was the last Democrat to serve in both the military and as president, so I don't know what kind of influence the experience might have on, say, foreign policy positions. I still think there is a lot of fetishization of the military on our country on both sides so I would not rule it out. It may not be a gateway, but it does give a certain cache to their political goals. Much more so than just being a lawyer or something. Tammy Duckworth might be good example on the D side. Not saying it would be her running, but I could see someone like that getting the D nomination. It really does still give cache. But deferring and dodging military service is no barrier either, as shown by both parties. Check out the graphs on military service by congress critters in this article, e.g. and governors: 40 No military service 5 Army (Nathan Deal, GA; Matt Bevin, KY; John Bel Edwards, LA; Henry McMaster, SC (Army Reserve); Ralph Northam, VA) 2 National Guard (Butch Otter, ID; Gary Herbert, UT) 3 Navy (Rick Scott, FL; Eric Holcomb, IN; Eric Greitens, MO) If a veteran gets elected president, it's probably going to be a Republican general with no civilian political experience. Colin Powell or John Kelly, I'm saying.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Mar 1, 2018 13:53:41 GMT -5
More on Chinese censorship from the always-great-on-anything-Chinese Language Log. Also a bit of digging around reveals that Obama’s commonly used for Tigger (due to the height difference) and Abe Shinzo is, amazingly, usually cast as Eeyore.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Mar 3, 2018 21:29:15 GMT -5
More on Chinese censorship from the always-great-on-anything-Chinese Language Log. Also a bit of digging around reveals that Obama’s commonly used for Tigger (due to the height difference) and Abe Shinzo is, amazingly, usually cast as Eeyore. I'm disappointed to learn that Language Log isn't a blog about Loglan.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Mar 4, 2018 15:40:42 GMT -5
Amazed that people still say stuff like “Buddhist countries are inherently more peaceful and tolerant,” completely missing the highest-visibility genocide going on right now.
|
|
fab
TI Forumite
strange days
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by fab on Mar 5, 2018 15:07:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ComradePig on Mar 9, 2018 22:53:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Mar 10, 2018 22:32:59 GMT -5
One poll had the PCs with twice the support of their nearest competitor in recent days and they’ve now elected the no less degenerate brother of Rob Ford to lead them in place of his Weinstein-affected predecessor. I’d like to think this would rapidly dissipate their support and make a Notley in Alberta-like surprise outcome much more likely, but I’m not especially hopeful. www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/national/ontario-pc-new-leader-doug-ford/article38268927/
|
|
fab
TI Forumite
strange days
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by fab on Mar 12, 2018 7:07:15 GMT -5
the conservative provincial party here in Ontario just had a clusterfuck of a leadership race, due to the former leader having been ousted over allegations of skeevy conduct, very much of the "come on dude, that's gross, and you should know better" but not quite meeting any threshold for legal action, natch. there was a bunch of song and dance, much political hay was made, and a bit of blood in the water as things got messy and internal strife was sorted.
and now Doug Ford is the ostensible leader of the provincial chapter of the party. (a party I have no love for and zero faith in, but it's still disappointing nonetheless.)
Doug. Fucking. Ford.
you guys remember Rob Ford? the blowhard former mayor of Toronto embroiled in some rather salacious scandal a few years back? the so-called "crack smoking mayor" with pretty obvious ties to some shady characters? Toronto rarely merits international news, but that managed to be seedy enough to cross the border, from what I'm told.
anyway, his brother has somehow managed to continue being a going political concern in spite of all that, remaining a Toronto councilor and eternally bloviated blowhard. and now he's almost guaranteed another term of power by the other major party in the region who has long since had a stranglehold, the Liberals, who have a rather painful history of treating the province like their own personal fiefdom since they consistently win a significant percentage of elections in a lock.
oddly enough, I think they're almost all universally terrible and I wouldn't trust any of these oily motherfuckers with selling me more than an overpriced coffin, let alone a viable political platform, but this really seems like the stupidest of all possible outcomes for any and all concerned. it does next to nothing for resetting the natural equilibrium that ought to happen when the incumbent party keeps doing stupid shit and takes their entrenched power for granted.
politics is fucking depressing.
|
|
|
Post by ComradePig on Mar 12, 2018 17:08:34 GMT -5
Maybe they thought they could get away with it because of Litivenko or maybe this all went ass up and was supposed to turn out different but the brazeness of the assassination attempt on Skripal by the Russians and deployment of the particular nerve agent involved is utterly confounding. One can only assume the individuals responsible are idiots who fucked up very badly or more unpleasantly that people higher up the chain are wholly divorced from reality.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Mar 12, 2018 20:07:54 GMT -5
One poll had the PCs with twice the support of their nearest competitor in recent days and they’ve now elected the no less degenerate brother of Rob Ford to lead them in place of his Weinstein-affected predecessor. I’d like to think this would rapidly dissipate their support and make a Notley in Alberta-like surprise outcome much more likely, but I’m not especially hopeful. www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/national/ontario-pc-new-leader-doug-ford/article38268927/Lucan, what would your reaction be if this was just the stepping stone to Douglas Ford somehow becoming the next PM of Canada?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Mar 12, 2018 21:15:40 GMT -5
One poll had the PCs with twice the support of their nearest competitor in recent days and they’ve now elected the no less degenerate brother of Rob Ford to lead them in place of his Weinstein-affected predecessor. I’d like to think this would rapidly dissipate their support and make a Notley in Alberta-like surprise outcome much more likely, but I’m not especially hopeful. www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/national/ontario-pc-new-leader-doug-ford/article38268927/Lucan, what would your reaction be if this was just the stepping stone to Douglas Ford somehow becoming the next PM of Canada? I’d think the peoplekind had made a lamentable choice in elevating him to that dignity.
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Mar 13, 2018 8:13:56 GMT -5
... President Bone Spurs is the last candidate we'll ever see who was eligible for a draft. Future candidates are going to be younger and more likely female, and we're some time away from Iraq/Afghanistan vets being of presidential age. Not that I think this is at all a good idea, but there's been some talk about Biden giving it the ol' college try in 2020. He didn't serve, but he was around for the draft.
|
|
fab
TI Forumite
strange days
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by fab on Mar 13, 2018 9:00:39 GMT -5
One poll had the PCs with twice the support of their nearest competitor in recent days and they’ve now elected the no less degenerate brother of Rob Ford to lead them in place of his Weinstein-affected predecessor. I’d like to think this would rapidly dissipate their support and make a Notley in Alberta-like surprise outcome much more likely, but I’m not especially hopeful. www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/national/ontario-pc-new-leader-doug-ford/article38268927/I somehow completely missed your post... It's like they don't want to win the election? or do they just entirely lack self respect as a party? Conservatism (in the classic sense of the political ideology) doesn't have to be a dirty word, but they're doing their damndest to sink the term to as base a level as possible anyhow. :/ I don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 13, 2018 10:36:53 GMT -5
... President Bone Spurs is the last candidate we'll ever see who was eligible for a draft. Future candidates are going to be younger and more likely female, and we're some time away from Iraq/Afghanistan vets being of presidential age. Not that I think this is at all a good idea, but there's been some talk about Biden giving it the ol' college try in 2020. He didn't serve, but he was around for the draft. Biden is already a two-time primary loser, but if he wants to embarrass himself after being a perfectly cromulent veep whatever. That will take care of itself long, long before the convention.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Mar 13, 2018 14:12:32 GMT -5
One poll had the PCs with twice the support of their nearest competitor in recent days and they’ve now elected the no less degenerate brother of Rob Ford to lead them in place of his Weinstein-affected predecessor. I’d like to think this would rapidly dissipate their support and make a Notley in Alberta-like surprise outcome much more likely, but I’m not especially hopeful. www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/national/ontario-pc-new-leader-doug-ford/article38268927/I somehow completely missed your post... It's like they don't want to win the election? or do they just entirely lack self respect as a party? Conservatism (in the classic sense of the political ideology) doesn't have to be a dirty word, but they're doing their damndest to sink the term to as base a level as possible anyhow. :/ I don't get it. They may very well win with him in place. Maybe the NDP can pull off an upset. Honestly, I’m not sure how much difference it makes to them programmatically, as offensive a personality as he is. Doug’s more capable of behaving in a semi-civilized fashion, though he lacks Rob’s gadabout, man-of-the-people bonhomie. What’s especially un-Trumpian about the Fords (especially Rob), is that they have much very loyal support amongst suburban immigrants and visible minorities, and their racism is altogether more casual and unaware than virulent.
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Mar 14, 2018 11:02:57 GMT -5
Making people think politics is depressing may or may not be a deliberate strategy of the Ontario Conservatives. When people think "all politics is bullshit" then they're more likely not to vote, which allows the minority of well-organized conservatives to squeak out a win.
I'm unsure if the NDP will see gains or losses. On the one hand, the ruling Liberals have been in power for 15 years and voters generally like to change the party in government every 10 years (this probably should have happened in the last election or the one before that but the Conservatives bungled their campaigns). Plus while the Premier appears clean there have been the usual cases of corruption springing up from the rest of her peeps as well as some various missteps.
However, people may be so fired up by the ABC (Anyone But Conservative) movement that they throw their support to the Liberals in the belief that voting for a third party of social democrats splits the left-centre vote and lets the Conservatives in, thus keeping the NDP in 3rd place.
Anyway, on to the important parts of election talk - unsubstantiated gossip and allegations not backed by evidence. This isn't so much rumour as it is a widely accepted fact, as it's pretty widely known that ole Dougie sold hash back in high school, but I have it on good authority that it was dry and shitty. Do we really want a man in charge of Ontario who can't even supply good hashish?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Mar 14, 2018 12:02:46 GMT -5
|
|