|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 0:23:30 GMT -5
Does it count that if it's a video of something that could be much better explained via text, I simply won't watch it? I'll watch music videos, and I'm fine with watching other people play video games (which I'm sure will be someone else's entry here), but if the article is a video, I'm out. This, exactly. I sometimes will click a news headline on my phone and when a video (instead of an article) pops up I just close it out. I'd rather read than watch an ad for something before finally getting to watch a video that I didn't need to watch. This is my jam! I hate those videos because 9 times out of 10 even without the ads and buffering it would take me longer to watch the stupid video than it would have to read an article containing the same information.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Feb 8, 2019 8:06:38 GMT -5
Also worth noting that minimalism is kind of classist to begin with. It's meant for people who are financially secure and have learned that buying a bunch of consumer goods doesn't make them happier, which is fine and all, and yeah, ideally we'd live in a world where people aren't just buying loads of stuff they don't need in the first place, but that's also never going to happen until there are major changes in the way and the reasons for which goods are produced and sold. I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. (I'm also picturing a TV show where someone is waiting for Marie Kondo to help them clean up, and instead Karl Marx shows up and convinces them that they can never be rid of stuff until we overthrow capitalism. Would watch.)
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 9:28:34 GMT -5
Also worth noting that minimalism is kind of classist to begin with. It's meant for people who are financially secure and have learned that buying a bunch of consumer goods doesn't make them happier, which is fine and all, and yeah, ideally we'd live in a world where people aren't just buying loads of stuff they don't need in the first place, but that's also never going to happen until there are major changes in the way and the reasons for which goods are produced and sold. I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. (I'm also picturing a TV show where someone is waiting for Marie Kondo to help them clean up, and instead Karl Marx shows up and convinces them that they can never be rid of stuff until we overthrow capitalism. Would watch.) I hate to be the bearer of bad news but Karl Marx is totally dead my dude.
|
|
|
Post by The Stuffingtacular She-Hulk on Feb 8, 2019 9:32:30 GMT -5
Also worth noting that minimalism is kind of classist to begin with. It's meant for people who are financially secure and have learned that buying a bunch of consumer goods doesn't make them happier, which is fine and all, and yeah, ideally we'd live in a world where people aren't just buying loads of stuff they don't need in the first place, but that's also never going to happen until there are major changes in the way and the reasons for which goods are produced and sold. I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. (I'm also picturing a TV show where someone is waiting for Marie Kondo to help them clean up, and instead Karl Marx shows up and convinces them that they can never be rid of stuff until we overthrow capitalism. Would watch.) I should note that my original post on the matter was spurred by having too many people tell me I "needed" to watch the show and I kind of hit my breaking point. I don't avoid media just because it's popular; I avoid media because it holds no interest for me. For example, I stopped watching Game of Thrones after season 5 because I realized it wasn't the kind of thing I wanted more of, and people still bug me about that several years later and want to convince me to give it another try, and the more they do it, the less I want to (not that I want to anyway). Recommendations are great! I love recommendations! But I really dislike it when I'm told repeatedly and without asking for it that I "have" to or "need" to consume a certain piece of media. I had a really terrible friend who would shove her "recommendations" down my throat (she was also terrible for other reasons) and would make fun of me and call me a killjoy if I told her that I appreciated the rec but didn't think it was really something I'd enjoy. So when other people do that, it evokes the same sort of "fuck you, don't tell me what to do" reaction in me. I know that's not rational, but I've just been burned too many times. I'm also not saying anyone here's done any of this, but I needed to vent in a place where I wouldn't get totally pummeled for being frustrated that nobody will just listen to me when I tell them I'd rather spend the time to clean and organize my own space rather than spend the same amount of time watching this show. If it helps people, great. I mean that. But there are also a lot of valid reasons that other people don't find it helpful.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Feb 8, 2019 9:51:16 GMT -5
I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. (I'm also picturing a TV show where someone is waiting for Marie Kondo to help them clean up, and instead Karl Marx shows up and convinces them that they can never be rid of stuff until we overthrow capitalism. Would watch.) I hate to be the bearer of bad news but Karl Marx is totally dead my dude. We live in a time where dead people regularly perform live concerts. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make a dead guy show up for a recorded TV show.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 10:13:13 GMT -5
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but Karl Marx is totally dead my dude. We live in a time where dead people regularly perform live concerts. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make a dead guy show up for a recorded TV show. Do we got decent HD footage of Marx from before he died?
|
|
Crash Test Dumbass
AV Clubber
ffc what now
Posts: 7,058
Gender (additional): mostly snacks
|
Post by Crash Test Dumbass on Feb 8, 2019 10:18:19 GMT -5
We live in a time where dead people regularly perform live concerts. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make a dead guy show up for a recorded TV show. Do we got decent HD footage of Marx from before he died? High definition is the opiate of the masses.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 10:45:57 GMT -5
Do we got decent HD footage of Marx from before he died? High definition is the opiate of the masses. Alright, then how a cardboard standee of Marx? NO WAIT! A MARX MUPPET!
|
|
|
Post by WKRP Jimmy Drop on Feb 8, 2019 11:28:44 GMT -5
I have mixed feelings about Marie Kondo. I DO want to encourage myself to get rid of things that I am not using, that don't fit, that are old and busted, etc. I do feel better with a bit less clutter in my life. I do get overly attached to objects sometimes. But, I don't think "minimalism" is right for everyone - and I understand a lot of the disagreement, too. There's nothing wrong with keeping something that you like having around, as long as you're not a hoarder. I don't think anyone is racist simply for not liking her, but there has *also* been some racist backlash, c.f. Barbara Ehrenreich and some of the terrible replies she got. Ok, to preface, I haven't watched her or really read anything about her other than what I've absorbed by internet osmosis, but my question would be is she really advocating minimalism, or is she advocating for mindfulness? i.e., look at all the shit you have and figure out what you're hanging onto that is has no aesthetic, practical, or emotional value to you?
I mean, yes, I'm a little sick of hearing about her, and I am avoiding purposefully seeing anything about her, but I'm pretty sure everyone could use a little "eh do I really need 600 almost identical cookie sheets?" in their life.
|
|
|
Post by Mrs David Tennant on Feb 8, 2019 12:31:20 GMT -5
I have mixed feelings about Marie Kondo. I DO want to encourage myself to get rid of things that I am not using, that don't fit, that are old and busted, etc. I do feel better with a bit less clutter in my life. I do get overly attached to objects sometimes. But, I don't think "minimalism" is right for everyone - and I understand a lot of the disagreement, too. There's nothing wrong with keeping something that you like having around, as long as you're not a hoarder. I don't think anyone is racist simply for not liking her, but there has *also* been some racist backlash, c.f. Barbara Ehrenreich and some of the terrible replies she got. Ok, to preface, I haven't watched her or really read anything about her other than what I've absorbed by internet osmosis, but my question would be is she really advocating minimalism, or is she advocating for mindfulness? i.e., look at all the shit you have and figure out what you're hanging onto that is has no aesthetic, practical, or emotional value to you?
I mean, yes, I'm a little sick of hearing about her, and I am avoiding purposefully seeing anything about her, but I'm pretty sure everyone could use a little "eh do I really need 600 almost identical cookie sheets?" in their life.
My friend could use a little Marie Kondo in her life. When I was helping her move* the other day she had packed up very carefully all of the little "art" pieces from her daughter's art classes. I'm like, why do you even still have these? Take a picture of them, throw it away, and move on with your life! *By helping her move, I mean watching the kids while everyone else did the heavy lifting.
|
|
|
Post by Pedantic Editor Type on Feb 8, 2019 13:03:43 GMT -5
I have mixed feelings about Marie Kondo. I DO want to encourage myself to get rid of things that I am not using, that don't fit, that are old and busted, etc. I do feel better with a bit less clutter in my life. I do get overly attached to objects sometimes. But, I don't think "minimalism" is right for everyone - and I understand a lot of the disagreement, too. There's nothing wrong with keeping something that you like having around, as long as you're not a hoarder. I don't think anyone is racist simply for not liking her, but there has *also* been some racist backlash, c.f. Barbara Ehrenreich and some of the terrible replies she got. Ok, to preface, I haven't watched her or really read anything about her other than what I've absorbed by internet osmosis, but my question would be is she really advocating minimalism, or is she advocating for mindfulness? i.e., look at all the shit you have and figure out what you're hanging onto that is has no aesthetic, practical, or emotional value to you?
I mean, yes, I'm a little sick of hearing about her, and I am avoiding purposefully seeing anything about her, but I'm pretty sure everyone could use a little "eh do I really need 600 almost identical cookie sheets?" in their life.
I think what she's truly advocating for is mindfulness, but some people hear it (or her version of it) and think minimalism.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Feb 8, 2019 20:55:20 GMT -5
We live in a time where dead people regularly perform live concerts. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make a dead guy show up for a recorded TV show. Do we got decent HD footage of Marx from before he died? Do you think a modern audience could tell the difference between Karl and Groucho? There's plenty of footage of Groucho, and I imagine somebody somewhere could CGI it into HD somehow.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 21:08:50 GMT -5
Do we got decent HD footage of Marx from before he died? Do you think a modern audience could tell the difference between Karl and Groucho? There's plenty of footage of Groucho, and I imagine somebody somewhere could CGI it into HD somehow. None of them have the Klassic Karl Marx Beard® but I think Harpo's hair is probably closer to Karl's than Groucho's is.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Feb 8, 2019 21:12:35 GMT -5
Do you think a modern audience could tell the difference between Karl and Groucho? There's plenty of footage of Groucho, and I imagine somebody somewhere could CGI it into HD somehow. None of them have the Klassic Karl Marx Beard® but I think Harpo's hair is probably closer to Karl's than Groucho's is. It would be entertaining to hear quotes about the class struggle, or about seizing the means of production, every time Harpo honks his horn. Or was that Lenin?
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 8, 2019 21:52:37 GMT -5
None of them have the Klassic Karl Marx Beard® but I think Harpo's hair is probably closer to Karl's than Groucho's is. It would be entertaining to hear quotes about the class struggle, or about seizing the means of production, every time Harpo honks his horn. Or was that Lenin? I thought it was Castro who had the horn.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 8, 2019 22:10:33 GMT -5
Also worth noting that minimalism is kind of classist to begin with. It's meant for people who are financially secure and have learned that buying a bunch of consumer goods doesn't make them happier, which is fine and all, and yeah, ideally we'd live in a world where people aren't just buying loads of stuff they don't need in the first place, but that's also never going to happen until there are major changes in the way and the reasons for which goods are produced and sold. I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. This is a good point. I should have specified that my problem with it is the presentation of minimalism as the means to happiness, especially when preached by the especially wealthy. I'm thinking back to a couple of the "frugality gurus" mentioned in this Atlantic article. I think it is classist to, say, be a startup multimillionaire and lecture people on how frugality is the way to the good life, but yeah, I shouldn't have said that minimalism itself must be, and the decisions you made about how to live your life certainly aren't. Edit: forgot to link to that old Atlantic article. Whoops.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Feb 8, 2019 22:14:37 GMT -5
It would be entertaining to hear quotes about the class struggle, or about seizing the means of production, every time Harpo honks his horn. Or was that Lenin? I thought it was Castro who had the horn. As far as I know,
Castro was the one with the cigar and the mustache and big eyebrows, Karl was the one with the wild hair who played the harp and honked the horn
Lenin was the one who played the piano and spoke in comedic gibberish sometimes
and Ho Chi Minh got tired of always playing the straight man, and finally split off from the group
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Feb 8, 2019 22:41:40 GMT -5
I thought it was Castro who had the horn. As far as I know,
Castro was the one with the cigar and the mustache and big eyebrows, Karl was the one with the wild hair who played the harp and honked the horn
Lenin was the one who played the piano and spoke in comedic gibberish sometimes
and Ho Chi Minh got tired of always playing the straight man, and finally split off from the group
And don't forget Mao who never made the transition from vaudeville to film.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 8, 2019 22:46:33 GMT -5
(I'm also picturing a TV show where someone is waiting for Marie Kondo to help them clean up, and instead Karl Marx shows up and convinces them that they can never be rid of stuff until we overthrow capitalism. Would watch.) I too think it would be very good if there was a new season of Marie Kondo's show where Karl Marx's CGI-realism-rendered hologram shows up and everyone is very disquieted by his uncanny valley Peter-Cushing's-face-in-Rogue-One-style body as he discusses how this all relates to Das Kapital. This also reminds me of another idea I've had for some time now. My idea is for an animated cartoon set in the early 2000s in which every episode would start out in out in a classroom at a private Christian academy or an evangelical Sunday school or a Liberty University lecture hall, where students are being taught about how actually the Founding Fathers treated their slaves well, or how Manifest Destiny actually was the work of divine Providence, or how Lincoln was a conservative hero because he was the first Republican president but also the Civil War was fought over states' rights, or what have you, when all of a sudden the leftist historian Howard Zinn breaks into the room, leaving a octogenarian-professor shaped hole in the wall, and shouts "Who wants to learn about the Wobblies?!?!?" And then the rest of the episode is about the teachers, professors, and students devising Loony Tunes-style traps to stop Zinn from teaching them about labor militants or US military atrocities or how the New Deal should have gone farther than merely saving capitalism from itself or what have you, but the traps all backfire in Roadrunner fashion as one-by-one the characters all become radicalized by the late author. And the show would, of course, be called Invader Zinn. And that is my pitch for a very niche cartoon based on a stupid pun I thought of once.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd Dinnertime Barber on Feb 8, 2019 22:46:50 GMT -5
As far as I know,
Castro was the one with the cigar and the mustache and big eyebrows, Karl was the one with the wild hair who played the harp and honked the horn
Lenin was the one who played the piano and spoke in comedic gibberish sometimes
and Ho Chi Minh got tired of always playing the straight man, and finally split off from the group
And don't forget Mao who never made the transition from vaudeville to film. I believe he became a theatrical agent.
|
|
Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Feb 9, 2019 11:28:01 GMT -5
I've always, naturally been a minimalist. And while now, sure, I'm financially secure, that was not always the case, and I'd argue that being a minimalist helped get me there. IMO, Minimalism isn't itself classist. If people seek it out and decide it makes them happier, why is that a problem? No one is forced to watch Marie Kondo or follow her advice. The people who do so are choosing it because they need help reducing the amount of clutter they have. If that's not you (or Shulkie), then great. Lifestyles and advice don't have apply to 100% of the population to be practical or beneficial. This is a good point. I should have specified that my problem with it is the presentation of minimalism as the means to happiness, especially when preached by the especially wealthy. I'm thinking back to a couple of the "frugality gurus" mentioned in this Atlantic article. I think it is classist to, say, be a startup multimillionaire and lecture people on how frugality is the way to the good life, but yeah, I shouldn't have said that minimalism itself must be, and the decisions you made about how to live your life certainly aren't. Edit: forgot to link to that old Atlantic article. Whoops. My problem with minimalism, from a class perspective, is that I can draw a straight line between my dad growing up in dire poverty and him becoming a hoarder.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Feb 9, 2019 11:36:55 GMT -5
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but Karl Marx is totally dead my dude. We live in a time where dead people regularly perform live concerts. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make a dead guy show up for a recorded TV show. The BBC did get him that one time:
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,090
|
Post by moimoi on Feb 9, 2019 15:07:06 GMT -5
I have mixed feelings about Marie Kondo. I DO want to encourage myself to get rid of things that I am not using, that don't fit, that are old and busted, etc. I do feel better with a bit less clutter in my life. I do get overly attached to objects sometimes. But, I don't think "minimalism" is right for everyone - and I understand a lot of the disagreement, too. There's nothing wrong with keeping something that you like having around, as long as you're not a hoarder. I don't think anyone is racist simply for not liking her, but there has *also* been some racist backlash, c.f. Barbara Ehrenreich and some of the terrible replies she got. Ok, to preface, I haven't watched her or really read anything about her other than what I've absorbed by internet osmosis, but my question would be is she really advocating minimalism, or is she advocating for mindfulness? i.e., look at all the shit you have and figure out what you're hanging onto that is has no aesthetic, practical, or emotional value to you?
I mean, yes, I'm a little sick of hearing about her, and I am avoiding purposefully seeing anything about her, but I'm pretty sure everyone could use a little "eh do I really need 600 almost identical cookie sheets?" in their life.
Thank you. I have read Marie Kondo - the manga version of her book - and basically all she is doing is popularizing a very Japanese approach to consumption. It's only classist through the lens of American capitalism, where having money/stuff is expected to bring peace of mind. She's a lot more interested in why we keep things rather than the number of things we keep (i.e. do you keep books because you love those books or to prove how well-read you are?). I'm really disappointed by how thoroughly she has been misinterpreted by writers who have only seen the reality show - which just sounds like an update of "Clean Sweep" or "Clean House" (the latter hosted by the fabulous Niecy Nash) which were never subject to backlash. This further suggests to me that there is some misguided racial/class-based animosity against her. Seriously, just read the manga.
|
|
|
Post by WKRP Jimmy Drop on Feb 9, 2019 17:27:20 GMT -5
This is a good point. I should have specified that my problem with it is the presentation of minimalism as the means to happiness, especially when preached by the especially wealthy. I'm thinking back to a couple of the "frugality gurus" mentioned in this Atlantic article. I think it is classist to, say, be a startup multimillionaire and lecture people on how frugality is the way to the good life, but yeah, I shouldn't have said that minimalism itself must be, and the decisions you made about how to live your life certainly aren't. Edit: forgot to link to that old Atlantic article. Whoops. My problem with minimalism, from a class perspective, is that I can draw a straight line between my dad growing up in dire poverty and him becoming a hoarder. And that makes a lot of sense to me. My grandmother grew up country poor ( I could never really tell how dire) & was also very much a Depression-era woman, and, while she was more of a packrat, she definitely had the mindset of being unable to throw away things that might be useful one day, like empty coffee cans & the like. She didn’t want to throw things out but she also didn’t want to spend money on new things unless she had to. Cleaning out her house after she died kinda impelled me to keep an eye on my own packrat tendencies. Which were probably inherited from her.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 9, 2019 18:54:16 GMT -5
Ok, to preface, I haven't watched her or really read anything about her other than what I've absorbed by internet osmosis, but my question would be is she really advocating minimalism, or is she advocating for mindfulness? i.e., look at all the shit you have and figure out what you're hanging onto that is has no aesthetic, practical, or emotional value to you?
I mean, yes, I'm a little sick of hearing about her, and I am avoiding purposefully seeing anything about her, but I'm pretty sure everyone could use a little "eh do I really need 600 almost identical cookie sheets?" in their life.
Thank you. I have read Marie Kondo - the manga version of her book - and basically all she is doing is popularizing a very Japanese approach to consumption. It's only classist through the lens of American capitalism, where having money/stuff is expected to bring peace of mind. She's a lot more interested in why we keep things rather than the number of things we keep (i.e. do you keep books because you love those books or to prove how well-read you are?). I'm really disappointed by how thoroughly she has been misinterpreted by writers who have only seen the reality show - which just sounds like an update of "Clean Sweep" or "Clean House" (the latter hosted by the fabulous Niecy Nash) which were never subject to backlash. This further suggests to me that there is some misguided racial/class-based animosity against her. Seriously, just read the manga. What does the book actually consist of? All the articles I've read about her manage to summarize her methodology in one or two paragraphs. What does she pad out the rest of the book (manga version or otherwise) with? Is it just a bunch of pictures of really outrageous clothing heaps and stuff?
|
|
moimoi
AV Clubber
Posts: 5,090
|
Post by moimoi on Feb 10, 2019 0:10:42 GMT -5
Thank you. I have read Marie Kondo - the manga version of her book - and basically all she is doing is popularizing a very Japanese approach to consumption. It's only classist through the lens of American capitalism, where having money/stuff is expected to bring peace of mind. She's a lot more interested in why we keep things rather than the number of things we keep (i.e. do you keep books because you love those books or to prove how well-read you are?). I'm really disappointed by how thoroughly she has been misinterpreted by writers who have only seen the reality show - which just sounds like an update of "Clean Sweep" or "Clean House" (the latter hosted by the fabulous Niecy Nash) which were never subject to backlash. This further suggests to me that there is some misguided racial/class-based animosity against her. Seriously, just read the manga. What does the book actually consist of? All the articles I've read about her manage to summarize her methodology in one or two paragraphs. What does she pad out the rest of the book (manga version or otherwise) with? Is it just a bunch of pictures of really outrageous clothing heaps and stuff? The konmari method isn't just instructions on how to clean; it's more focused on a person's relationship with their stuff. Each chapter corresponds to one step in the method and the manga tells the story of how a client improves her life by de-cluttering, step by step. Some key takeaways: "Success in tidying depends 90 percent on your mind-set...the chances of a rebound are higher if you only learn the 'how-tos' of tidying" (Ch. 1 Decide to Tidy Up in which Chiaki is confronted by a neighbor about her messiness) "By thinking about your ideal lifestyle, you will begin identifying why you really want to tidy and the kind of life you want once you have finished." (Ch. 2 Visualize Your Ideal Lifestyle in which Marie makes Chiaki confront her past and current lifestyle) "The true purpose of your home and your things is to bring you happiness. So, naturally, the criterion for choosing [what to discard] should be whether keeping something will make you happy. (Ch. 3 Finish Discarding First in which Marie explains the difference between material value, functional value, informational value, emotional value, and rarity) "Most people can't tidy because they have too much stuff. They accumulate too much stuff because they don't know how much they actually own." (Ch. 4 Tidy By Category in which Marie makes Chiaki confront all the stuff she has accumulated) "By touching your clothes with your hands, you pass on your energy" (Ch. 5 Just Fold and Stand Upright in which Marie demonstrates the ins and outs of folding and makes a case for mindfulness) "Get rid of all your unread, neglected books. When you're left with only those that spark joy, you'll find that the quality of information that comes your way changes dramatically." (Ch. 6 Choose Books by Feel, in which Marie discusses the importance of timing and letting go of 'someday') "The Rule of Thumb for papers is discard them all. Keep only those that you're certain you will use in the future." (Ch. 7 Paper and Komono in which Marie convinces Chiaki that there are a lot of things she won't miss if she discards them) "We should use our space not for the person we once were, but for our future selves." (Ch. 8 Leave Sentimental Items for Last in which Chiaki lets go of past heartbreak) "If we take good care of our possessions, they will take good care of us." (Ch. 9 Store Things Where They Belong in which Marie demonstrates how to store things for use, not for hiding) In the final chapter, "Real Life Begins After Putting Your House in Order" Chiaki finds love and lives a clean, uncluttered life ever after. It's not complicated, but it can be profound in practice. Every year, I do a 'konmari Christmas' de-clutter and it feels good - more like self-care than a chore. It's not shame-based, which seems to be what detractors think it is.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Feb 10, 2019 1:59:37 GMT -5
What does the book actually consist of? All the articles I've read about her manage to summarize her methodology in one or two paragraphs. What does she pad out the rest of the book (manga version or otherwise) with? Is it just a bunch of pictures of really outrageous clothing heaps and stuff? The konmari method isn't just instructions on how to clean; it's more focused on a person's relationship with their stuff. Each chapter corresponds to one step in the method and the manga tells the story of how a client improves her life by de-cluttering, step by step. Some key takeaways: "Success in tidying depends 90 percent on your mind-set...the chances of a rebound are higher if you only learn the 'how-tos' of tidying" (Ch. 1 Decide to Tidy Up in which Chiaki is confronted by a neighbor about her messiness) "By thinking about your ideal lifestyle, you will begin identifying why you really want to tidy and the kind of life you want once you have finished." (Ch. 2 Visualize Your Ideal Lifestyle in which Marie makes Chiaki confront her past and current lifestyle) "The true purpose of your home and your things is to bring you happiness. So, naturally, the criterion for choosing [what to discard] should be whether keeping something will make you happy. (Ch. 3 Finish Discarding First in which Marie explains the difference between material value, functional value, informational value, emotional value, and rarity) "Most people can't tidy because they have too much stuff. They accumulate too much stuff because they don't know how much they actually own." (Ch. 4 Tidy By Category in which Marie makes Chiaki confront all the stuff she has accumulated) "By touching your clothes with your hands, you pass on your energy" (Ch. 5 Just Fold and Stand Upright in which Marie demonstrates the ins and outs of folding and makes a case for mindfulness) "Get rid of all your unread, neglected books. When you're left with only those that spark joy, you'll find that the quality of information that comes your way changes dramatically." (Ch. 6 Choose Books by Feel, in which Marie discusses the importance of timing and letting go of 'someday') "The Rule of Thumb for papers is discard them all. Keep only those that you're certain you will use in the future." (Ch. 7 Paper and Komono in which Marie convinces Chiaki that there are a lot of things she won't miss if she discards them) "We should use our space not for the person we once were, but for our future selves." (Ch. 8 Leave Sentimental Items for Last in which Chiaki lets go of past heartbreak) "If we take good care of our possessions, they will take good care of us." (Ch. 9 Store Things Where They Belong in which Marie demonstrates how to store things for use, not for hiding) In the final chapter, "Real Life Begins After Putting Your House in Order" Chiaki finds love and lives a clean, uncluttered life ever after. It's not complicated, but it can be profound in practice. Every year, I do a 'konmari Christmas' de-clutter and it feels good - more like self-care than a chore. It's not shame-based, which seems to be what detractors think it is. Is Chiaki a real person or is she like when a politician talks about a "Dave Sampson, an electrician in Toledo, Ohio I talked to the other day."
|
|
|
Post by Pastafarian on Feb 10, 2019 11:11:45 GMT -5
Is Chiaki a real person or is she like when a politician talks about a "Dave Sampson, an electrician in Toledo, Ohio I talked to the other day." Chiaki must be real, otherwise Joanie wouldn't love him. I really should be ashamed of myself.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Feb 10, 2019 13:21:49 GMT -5
The TI Forums:I really should be ashamed of myself.
|
|
|
Post by Hachiman on Feb 12, 2019 2:44:30 GMT -5
Dawson's Creek Smallville Really, anything on the CW prior to the CW-gateway drug the Vampire Diaries.
|
|