|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jan 21, 2015 1:29:39 GMT -5
Watched Paweł Pawlikowski's Ida and highly recommend it. It's about a Polish novitiate in the early Sixties who learns about the death of her parents before planning to take her vows. The most interesting aspect to me wasn't her learning about what had happened to them, but rather the dynamic between her cloistered existence and her aunt who she meets for the first time and who exposes her to the world of profane pleasure. Why she makes a certain decision at the end isn't clear but trying to discern her reasons is the most compelling part of it to me. It's gorgeously shot in black and white and the two leads, Agata Trzebuchowska and Agata Kulesza are excellent, the former having a hauntingly innocent looking face that the camera lingers on frequently.
The only negative review I've seen was in The New Yorker and its objections make absolutely no sense. It's possibly the most baseless and incoherent review of a film I've ever read.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jan 21, 2015 9:57:24 GMT -5
I finally watched The Baader-Meinhof Complex and, wow—why did I leave this on the shelf for a couple of years after getting it at a sale? Formally, it’s a very well-paced long movie, but it also does a great job of capturing the ultimate superficiality of terrorism, how it turns simple misbehavior self-righteous and escalates out of control. You how easy it is to get drawn in, but also why it’s so wrong, and never with a preachy moment. And I’m glad I know German—it has a well-developed vocabulary for both romantic myth and for leftist jargon (you see how ideology turns into a tool for sustenance and self-deception). Bruno Ganz is there (playing a very PSH-in-A Most Wanted Man-esque role, the humanist security/intelligence official), but the actor playing one of the leaders of Read Army Faction, Johanna Wokalek, is incredible. (Also, props for a great depiction of how leftists are still trapped by the petty cultural prejudices of their upbringing).
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jan 21, 2015 10:54:05 GMT -5
I finally watched The Baader-Meinhof Complex and, wow—why did I leave this on the shelf for a couple of years after getting it at a sale? Formally, it’s a very well-paced long movie, but it also does a great job of capturing the ultimate superficiality of terrorism, how it turns simple misbehavior self-righteous and escalates out of control. You how easy it is to get drawn in, but also why it’s so wrong, and never with a preachy moment. And I’m glad I know German—it has a well-developed vocabulary for both romantic myth and for leftist jargon (you see how ideology turns into a tool for sustenance and self-deception). Bruno Ganz is there (playing a very PSH-in- A Most Wanted Man-esque role, the humanist security/intelligence official), but the actor playing one of the leaders of Read Army Faction, Johanna Wokalek, is incredible. (Also, props for a great depiction of how leftists are still trapped by the petty cultural prejudices of their upbringing). Great film. The attacks they mounted were pretty staggering in their ambition and number. It's been a while since I've seen it but I remember finding their training visit to the Fatah base in Jordan and the female nudity and general licentiousness which annoyed their hosts amusing. I can't be sure, but I seem to remember it depicting the Socialist Patients' Collective, that weird R. D. Laing-ian group recruited from mental hospitals. They were murderers, of course, and campaigns such as theirs are only ever wildly counter-productive to the cause they wish to advance, because the violence alienates their would-be supporters. Even where they ostensibly succeed, such as Russia in 1917, they fail, because vangardism of that kind invariably turns against the proletariat itself. On the other hand, as a kind of pure social revenge fantasy, one can share in some of their frustration with the drift of society, and also appreciate how they did have a legitimate sense of how the Gramscian superstructure secures haute-bourgeois hegemony. Murdering the chairman of Dresdner Bank and blowing up the Axel Springer offices are obviously evil, and yet watching the film did underline to me the fact of the mentality of individuals within coercive, anti-democratic institutions: that so long as they are a cog in the machine and never see the ultimate consequences of their actions, they aren't culpable as moral agents for anything they do, and are frequently confounded if anyone suggests they're doing something morally wrong.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Jan 21, 2015 10:59:07 GMT -5
2001! I haven't seen it before, got to see it in 70mm tonight for a class. I'm not still entirely sure how I feel about it in regards to a full blown analysis, but just aesthetically it was obviously amazing, and I love how Kubrick is great at balancing entertainment and art. It's a really quiet film in the sense that there's very little dialogue, and yet there's always conflict and tension. It's never boring despite its length. And soooo many people started laughing during the scene where Dave shuts down Hal. That grinds me gears. I get it you've seen it a million times so it's funny, but like, can you not? It was in Toronto so the moment you head to the neighborhood the theatre is at, everyone just turns hip as fuck, like they just stepped out of a fucking L.L. Bean catalog. I'm sure everyone has a legitimate reason to be there but when everyone is laughing I can't just help but assume they're only really there so they can brag that they saw 2001 in 70mm. Liked not because of knee-jerk hipster hatred on my part, but because anyone not horrified by the idea of losing their mind as depicted in the movie must not have much mind to lose.
|
|
|
Post by Beatrix Kiddo 9000 on Jan 21, 2015 19:20:47 GMT -5
I always try to see every movie nominated at the Oscars for Best Picture. I had little interest in seeing American Sniper but after taking a piss on every other movie ever released in January and securing six nominations, I had to see it.
And I pretty much hated it.
Bradley Cooper is great. He's pretty much the only reason to see the movie. For the first hour and a half I would say the movie is perfectly fine. Nothing revolutionary but not inherently terrible either. Then, there is a certain kill that occurs that really rubbed me the wrong way. The story, and the way the scene was directed, made it that when this individual died, you should want to stand up and cheer. I didn't go to a theater (sorry, I just didn't want to give the movie more money) but I have a sneaking suspicion that many people did applaud when this person died. To me, that's ridiculous and offensive.
Other than that moment, the movie just feels half baked. The supportive wife character is given nothing to do and is paper thin. The movie touches on PTSD, it alludes to the horrors of war, but it doesn't delve very deep. It just paints a particular person as a hero and that's about it.
I don't think the film is actually very political. Chris Kyle isn't portrayed as a bible thumper and politics don't play much of a role, so it's interesting that the movie has essentially become the beacon of hope to many right wingers.
With its box office dominance, and the large amount of respect Eastwood has in Hollywood, I fear this might take the top prize at the Academy. It would be a darn shame. This is basically Eastwood's version of The Hurt Locker except way, way shittier.
|
|
mattepntr
Newbie
Just an AV Clubber who wandered over here.
Posts: 19
|
Post by mattepntr on Jan 21, 2015 21:33:27 GMT -5
Gone Girl
It was alright.
|
|
|
Post by MarkInTexas on Jan 22, 2015 14:42:29 GMT -5
They Came Together
I have kind of mixed feelings about this one. On one hand, there are parts of the film that are very, very, very funny. However, other parts make the same mistake that SNL, Family Guy, and the various Seltzer/Friedburg movies do, in that thinking of specifically pointing out a stupid trope substitutes for a joke. That said, They Came Together, even in its weakest moments, is far, far better than anything I've seen from any other spoof film since the heyday of The Naked Gun, probably because of the sheer amount of talent both behind and especially in front of the camera. So, I guess I did really like it, but I wish it was even better than it was.
|
|
Baron von Costume
TI Forumite
Like an iron maiden made of pillows... the punishment is decadence!
Posts: 4,683
|
Post by Baron von Costume on Jan 22, 2015 16:19:17 GMT -5
They Came TogetherI have kind of mixed feelings about this one. On one hand, there are parts of the film that are very, very, very funny. However, other parts make the same mistake that SNL, Family Guy, and the various Seltzer/Friedburg movies do, in that thinking of specifically pointing out a stupid trope substitutes for a joke. That said, They Came Together, even in its weakest moments, is far, far better than anything I've seen from any other spoof film since the heyday of The Naked Gun, probably because of the sheer amount of talent both behind and especially in front of the camera. So, I guess I did really like it, but I wish it was even better than it was. I made the mistake of watching it not long after a Wet Hot American Summer rewatch and yeah, some of it really landed but other parts felt really lazy.
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Jan 23, 2015 3:16:54 GMT -5
Just watched Frank. Holy shit. This blew me away. I'm not sure I'm ready to crown it my favorite of 2014 over Whiplash, but holy fucking shit, you guys. It's the weirdest, most wonderful little movie. And the soundtrack is incredible.
|
|
Dellarigg
AV Clubber
This is a public service announcement - with guitars
Posts: 7,631
|
Post by Dellarigg on Jan 23, 2015 17:49:08 GMT -5
The Getaway, Peckinpah version. Enjoyed it very much. Nice to see a film that is effortlessly cool, rather than an effortful failure to be cool such as Drive, Only God Forgives. Naturally, some elements in the deployment of Ali MacGraw show their age, but at least she gets a scene where she stands up to Steve McQueen, if not outright hands him his ass. In short, good and taut.
|
|
|
Post by dboonsghost on Jan 24, 2015 0:02:18 GMT -5
The Getaway, Peckinpah version. Enjoyed it very much. Nice to see a film that is effortlessly cool, rather than an effortful failure to be cool such as Drive, Only God Forgives. Naturally, some elements in the deployment of Ali MacGraw show their age, but at least she gets a scene where she stands up to Steve McQueen, if not outright hands him his ass. In short, good and taut. That movie OWNS. Plus it has the best chase scene of all time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 3:12:47 GMT -5
The Heat(2013) I can't believe I missed it when this came out. It was really damn funny and kinda refreshing to see a Rated R comedy that wasn't just dumb sex jokes. That's about it really.... oh, better than Drive(2011) blah, blah, blah.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jan 24, 2015 7:22:56 GMT -5
Watched Calvary. Brendan Gleeson was great for the part of the older, mostly unflappable, world-wise priest. The beauty of the natural landscape is put to great use. Very well-written and uncompromising. It's variously sweet, humorous and quite sinister. Some of the characters who were meant to be darkly humorous struck me as purely perverse and threatening, but I'm not a fan of black humour. Still, it has a lot of sincerity and heart in spite of all that, which is likely the point and which I respect. A key event seemed contrived (I couldn't discern any rational purpose for it), but I'm not sure if that's a criticism or not. I'm never sure to what extent contrived events and characters are justifiable or not as an artistic device. A couple of scenes really stick in my mind to think about, but I suppose this movie did less so overall than Ida, despite the latter being far more oblique and implicit in its themes. It didn't hugely move me, but it's a very good film, well-worth watching.
It seemed somewhat anachronistic inasmuch as it depicted a community at which the priest and parish church were the acknowledged center of a community, but a character in the film makes that point himself; there's a general lack of reverence accorded Gleeson's character; and one of the most arresting scenes in the film depicted the outright hostility and distrust that every individual member of clergy are now viewed with by some as a result of the sex abuse revelations. But it's not a very tendentious film in any regard.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Jan 24, 2015 7:29:16 GMT -5
It's been awhile since I watched an actual movie, but my son checked out Peter Jackson's King Kong from the library, so I watched it with him (I had not seen it before). It has its moments, but it somehow is less fun and makes less sense than a movie featuring a giant ape on a hidden island in love with a girl ought to. The good news is he also checked out Raiders of the Lost Ark and Jurassic Park, so I've got that to look forward to this weekend.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,678
|
Post by repulsionist on Jan 24, 2015 8:25:51 GMT -5
Coherence - Stuck together real well for me. Superb.
|
|
|
Post by NerdInTheBasement on Jan 24, 2015 14:13:44 GMT -5
The Interview: An occasionally slow beginning leads to a surprisingly fun and involving features. I'll be quoting this well made flick for quite a while!
"The tiger has night-vision goggles??"
|
|
|
Post by Bizarre Gardening Accident on Jan 24, 2015 14:43:30 GMT -5
They were murderers, of course, and campaigns such as theirs are only ever wildly counter-productive to the cause they wish to advance, because the violence alienates their would-be supporters. Even where they ostensibly succeed, such as Russia in 1917, they fail, because vangardism of that kind invariably turns against the proletariat itself. On the other hand, as a kind of pure social revenge fantasy, one can share in some of their frustration with the drift of society, and also appreciate how they did have a legitimate sense of how the Gramscian superstructure secures haute-bourgeois hegemony. Murdering the chairman of Dresdner Bank and blowing up the Axel Springer offices are obviously evil, and yet watching the film did underline to me the fact of the mentality of individuals within coercive, anti-democratic institutions: that so long as they are a cog in the machine and never see the ultimate consequences of their actions, they aren't culpable as moral agents for anything they do, and are frequently confounded if anyone suggests they're doing something morally wrong. The Bolsheviks were the same as Baader-Meinhof? Come on! They were an enormous mass membership party! Not defending them after Stalin took over and purged Lenin's supporters, but it's just a flat out lie to compare them in any way to a tiny terrorist organisation. I'd direct a little more of my ire at what those banks did to generations of working people and a little less at the people who took revenge on them. Or was that entire post a joke? It's sort of hard to tell.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Lucan on Jan 24, 2015 14:57:07 GMT -5
They were murderers, of course, and campaigns such as theirs are only ever wildly counter-productive to the cause they wish to advance, because the violence alienates their would-be supporters. Even where they ostensibly succeed, such as Russia in 1917, they fail, because vangardism of that kind invariably turns against the proletariat itself. On the other hand, as a kind of pure social revenge fantasy, one can share in some of their frustration with the drift of society, and also appreciate how they did have a legitimate sense of how the Gramscian superstructure secures haute-bourgeois hegemony. Murdering the chairman of Dresdner Bank and blowing up the Axel Springer offices are obviously evil, and yet watching the film did underline to me the fact of the mentality of individuals within coercive, anti-democratic institutions: that so long as they are a cog in the machine and never see the ultimate consequences of their actions, they aren't culpable as moral agents for anything they do, and are frequently confounded if anyone suggests they're doing something morally wrong. The Bolsheviks were the same as Baader-Meinhof? Come on! They were an enormous mass membership party! Not defending them after Stalin took over and purged Lenin's supporters, but it's just a flat out lie to compare them in any way to a tiny terrorist organisation. I'd direct a little more of my ire at what those banks did to generations of working people and a little less at the people who took revenge on them. Or was that entire post a joke? It's sort of hard to tell. I'm not a Sovietologist, but I think it's well-documented that Lenin and Trotsky moved immediately to purge the soviets, create a police state and silence any genuine socialist opposition (or what Lenin called 'infantile Leftism') after coming to power. Stalin's rule was even more brutal, but I don't think it differed radically in kind. That's my understanding, at least. I realize Baader-Meinhof was a tiny terrorist cell and not a political party with a popular base, but I was comparing them in terms of a vanguardist mentality and how Marxists of a more democratic stripe have always felt it was counterproductive. I don't understand your second point at all. My point was that their murder of individuals was wrong but that the shock on the part of their targets (e.g. bankers) that anyone would object to what they were doing that strongly was revealing in terms of their own moral corruption.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Jan 24, 2015 18:06:05 GMT -5
With A Most Violent Year and Ex Machina I just had two nights of back to back Oscar Isaac. Two very different but both actually very good films, Isaac is great in both.
|
|
Dellarigg
AV Clubber
This is a public service announcement - with guitars
Posts: 7,631
|
Post by Dellarigg on Jan 24, 2015 18:22:56 GMT -5
Carrying on, and in fact ending, my Jim Thompson kick with The Grifters. It was fine. The script wisely amplified some aspects of the book while truncating others, but aside from a few shots that looked like the covers of pulp novels, Stephen Frears' direction is quite dull and workmanlike.
|
|
|
Post by flapjackriley on Jan 25, 2015 3:44:37 GMT -5
Watched Rocky as my first pick for this Gender and Sexuality in Film class I'm taking. I love 70s cinema, I really really do.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Jan 25, 2015 9:55:23 GMT -5
Midnight in ParisOwen Wilson is a time traveler who goes back to the 1920s in Paris which he thinks is some kind of Golden Age. There meets a girl in who tells him he's a moron and that the real Golden Age, is actually the 1890s. Since the 1890s has better hats, dwarves, and the can-can I am inclined to agree. In the end Owen Wilson walks in the rain with the lesbian from Blue is the Warmest Color. Rating: 1/2
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Jan 25, 2015 12:41:47 GMT -5
I've been sick with either a cold or a flu, so yesterday I stayed in bed and watched Point Break. It's really a perfect Saturday afternoon movie. I'd never seen it before, but it had been on my list for a while and the other movies I had on hand seemed too deep to watch while fever-tripping (Atonement, The Sound of My Voice, Never Let Me Go).
I'd forgotten how shitty the early 90's looked. The clothes and the boxy cars gave me a feeling of constriction and heat stroke, like I was wearing too-tight clothes in a noisy office with no air conditioning. And it's got that L.A. River again from Terminator 2, probably one of the crappiest rivers in the world.
I do wonder how the surfing scenes were shot. It would have been hilarious if the director had used the same trick as Elvis in Blue Hawaii, but the actors and their doubles were actually out there on the waves. And kudos to all for the sky diving scenes. They make no sense and are barely justifiable in plot terms, but they do tie in thematically to the whole "freedom" thing the surfers are into. I must mention that my only exposure to surfer talk is from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, so it was kind of weird hearing people say "radical" unironically.
I also have to give props for how the action unfolds. The movie zips along from scene to scene with nary a slow part. The biggest negative to the movie is, once again, Keanu Reeves' acting. I forget every time how wooden he is and am reminded whenever I see a new movie with him in it. But overall, I found this movie diverting.
|
|
Dellarigg
AV Clubber
This is a public service announcement - with guitars
Posts: 7,631
|
Post by Dellarigg on Jan 25, 2015 17:43:45 GMT -5
Nebraska. I ended up switching it off, I'm afraid. It was boring me quite severely.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,678
|
Post by repulsionist on Jan 26, 2015 14:12:50 GMT -5
Carrying on, and in fact ending, my Jim Thompson kick with The Grifters. It was fine. The script wisely amplified some aspects of the book while truncating others, but aside from a few shots that looked like the covers of pulp novels, Stephen Frears' direction is quite dull and workmanlike. No, no, no, no. That simply will not do. Not without Coup de Torchon or After Dark, My Sweet. I'll allow dismissals of The Killer Inside Me. Coup de Torchon is classic: "Oh, the French get it, and a little better with more nuance than some ham-fisted-American-Dream-is-its-own-penalty Yank would."
|
|
Post-Lupin
Prolific Poster
Immanentizing the Eschaton
Posts: 5,673
|
Post by Post-Lupin on Jan 26, 2015 16:15:17 GMT -5
The Guest, which I loved. As perfect an homage to John Carpenter as one could wish for, and Maika Monroe is young-Virginia-Madsen-level gorgeous.
|
|
Dellarigg
AV Clubber
This is a public service announcement - with guitars
Posts: 7,631
|
Post by Dellarigg on Jan 26, 2015 16:25:53 GMT -5
Carrying on, and in fact ending, my Jim Thompson kick with The Grifters. It was fine. The script wisely amplified some aspects of the book while truncating others, but aside from a few shots that looked like the covers of pulp novels, Stephen Frears' direction is quite dull and workmanlike. No, no, no, no. That simply will not do. Not without Coup de Torchon or After Dark, My Sweet. I'll allow dismissals of The Killer Inside Me. Coup de Torchon is classic: "Oh, the French get it, and a little better with more nuance than some ham-fisted-American-Dream-is-its-own-penalty Yank would." *lights cigarette* I'll look into it. *walks away*
|
|
|
Post by William T. Goat, Esq. on Jan 26, 2015 20:16:38 GMT -5
Tarsem's Mirror Mirror, the other Snow White movie from 2012. A bit too sitcommy for my tastes. Not sure how to feel about the last scene. Up until then, the subversion of the damsel-in-distress trope was kind of clever and subtle, but then at the very end they had to sort of rub it in our face. "Hey look, we told the story wrong! Get it?" The Beast, however, was a very cool creature design, and I wish I could have seen more of it in action.
|
|
|
Post by flapjackriley on Jan 27, 2015 1:08:17 GMT -5
Tarsem's Mirror Mirror, the other Snow White movie from 2012. A bit too sitcommy for my tastes. Not sure how to feel about the last scene. Up until then, the subversion of the damsel-in-distress trope was kind of clever and subtle, but then at the very end they had to sort of rub it in our face. "Hey look, we told the story wrong! Get it?" The Beast, however, was a very cool creature design, and I wish I could have seen more of it in action. My mom and I watched that. And by watched that we played on our phones the whole time (in the comfort of our home not at a theater). I do remember wondering what on earth was stopping anyone from overthrowing Julia Roberts. She was absolutely not a threat.
|
|
|
Post by Nudeviking on Jan 27, 2015 2:07:52 GMT -5
I watched Amélie last night with my ladywife. She had never seen it before. I, on the other hand, watched it dozens of times in the early aughts. Both of us enjoyed it rather thoroughly. My crush on Audrey Tautou's haircut in that film endures to this very day.
|
|