|
Post by songstarliner on Dec 1, 2015 23:23:07 GMT -5
We just finished watching last night's episode. Goddamn it that was good. The way it just ratcheted the tension up and up, that it made you feel sympathetic towards even the sociopaths, that just perfect ending - that was one of the best episodes of TV I've seen all year. Yesssss. I think one of the hallmarks of excellent storytelling is that the villains are just as interesting and even as sympathetic as the heroes - and that the line between them is very blurry. Hot damn, what a show. I'll miss Dodd, although I know he had to go. One other thing: the Mike Milligan character has been dinging my feels-familiar bell for the whole series, but I just couldn't place him. Then the other day I was flipping through the channels and ended up on Firefly and DING! it's Jubal Early from "Objects in Space." I feel so much better now.
|
|
Post-Lupin
Prolific Poster
Immanentizing the Eschaton
Posts: 5,673
|
Post by Post-Lupin on Dec 4, 2015 7:20:20 GMT -5
We just finished watching last night's episode. Goddamn it that was good. The way it just ratcheted the tension up and up, that it made you feel sympathetic towards even the sociopaths, that just perfect ending - that was one of the best episodes of TV I've seen all year. Yesssss. I think one of the hallmarks of excellent storytelling is that the villains are just as interesting and even as sympathetic as the heroes - and that the line between them is very blurry. Hot damn, what a show. I'll miss Dodd, although I know he had to go. One other thing: the Mike Milligan character has been dinging my feels-familiar bell for the whole series, but I just couldn't place him. Then the other day I was flipping through the channels and ended up on Firefly and DING! it's Jubal Early from "Objects in Space." I feel so much better now. The whole episode was a great reminder of how funny Jeffery Donovan can be.
|
|
Spicoli Burger
TI Forumite
Tender, juicy, and slathered in special sauce
Posts: 200
|
Fargo
Dec 7, 2015 10:53:17 GMT -5
Post by Spicoli Burger on Dec 7, 2015 10:53:17 GMT -5
We just finished watching last night's episode. Goddamn it that was good. The way it just ratcheted the tension up and up, that it made you feel sympathetic towards even the sociopaths, that just perfect ending - that was one of the best episodes of TV I've seen all year. Yesssss. I think one of the hallmarks of excellent storytelling is that the villains are just as interesting and even as sympathetic as the heroes - and that the line between them is very blurry. Hot damn, what a show. I'll miss Dodd, although I know he had to go. One other thing: the Mike Milligan character has been dinging my feels-familiar bell for the whole series, but I just couldn't place him. Then the other day I was flipping through the channels and ended up on Firefly and DING! it's Jubal Early from "Objects in Space." I feel so much better now. THANK you! I was having the same impression, and I didn't know how to articulate it before. But yes, he reminds me a LOT of Jubal Early. . .but you know it's not literally the same actor, right?
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Dec 7, 2015 11:23:19 GMT -5
Yesssss. I think one of the hallmarks of excellent storytelling is that the villains are just as interesting and even as sympathetic as the heroes - and that the line between them is very blurry. Hot damn, what a show. I'll miss Dodd, although I know he had to go. One other thing: the Mike Milligan character has been dinging my feels-familiar bell for the whole series, but I just couldn't place him. Then the other day I was flipping through the channels and ended up on Firefly and DING! it's Jubal Early from "Objects in Space." I feel so much better now. THANK you! Â I was having the same impression, and I didn't know how to articulate it before. Â But yes, he reminds me a LOT of Jubal Early. . .but you know it's not literally the same actor, right? Oh yes! I meant they have similar mannerisms. I can't wait for tonight's episode.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Fargo
Dec 7, 2015 20:07:45 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 20:07:45 GMT -5
THANK you! I was having the same impression, and I didn't know how to articulate it before. But yes, he reminds me a LOT of Jubal Early. . .but you know it's not literally the same actor, right? Oh yes! I meant they have similar mannerisms. I can't wait for tonight's episode. I'm so glad I stopped by this thread, or I'd have completely forgotten to watch!
|
|
|
Post by songstarliner on Dec 8, 2015 0:58:24 GMT -5
Great, great stuff.
Yes or no on the UFO? For me it's a resounding YES - so tired of shows pussyfooting around with mystical, paranormal events and then not having the guts to go there (and yes, I'm talking about True Detective 1, among others.) Besides, "realism" in fiction isn't strictly necessary. I've read and loved so many stories that blur the line between real and unreal that it doesn't bother me in the slightest. On the contrary, it makes me love this story more.
And amidst a sea of tremendous performances, Zahn McClarnon quietly stole the show. The brief look he gave Floyd right before gutting her was heartbreaking. Simultaneously so excited and so sad about the upcoming finale.
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 8, 2015 4:14:46 GMT -5
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Dec 8, 2015 4:14:46 GMT -5
Did anybody else lose count of the episodes and think about 30 minutes in that this was the finale?
|
|
Post-Lupin
Prolific Poster
Immanentizing the Eschaton
Posts: 5,673
|
Post by Post-Lupin on Dec 8, 2015 9:15:45 GMT -5
Great, great stuff. Yes or no on the UFO? For me it's a resounding YES - so tired of shows pussyfooting around with mystical, paranormal events and then not having the guts to go there (and yes, I'm talking about True Detective 1, among others.) Besides, "realism" in fiction isn't strictly necessary. I've read and loved so many stories that blur the line between real and unreal that it doesn't bother me in the slightest. On the contrary, it makes me love this story more. And amidst a sea of tremendous performances, Zahn McClarnon quietly stole the show. The brief look he gave Floyd right before gutting her was heartbreaking. Simultaneously so excited and so sad about the upcoming finale. It's just a flying saucer, Ed.
|
|
|
Post by disqusf3dme on Dec 8, 2015 18:36:10 GMT -5
Great, great stuff. Yes or no on the UFO? For me it's a resounding YES - so tired of shows pussyfooting around with mystical, paranormal events and then not having the guts to go there (and yes, I'm talking about True Detective 1, among others.) Besides, "realism" in fiction isn't strictly necessary. I've read and loved so many stories that blur the line between real and unreal that it doesn't bother me in the slightest. On the contrary, it makes me love this story more. And amidst a sea of tremendous performances, Zahn McClarnon quietly stole the show. The brief look he gave Floyd right before gutting her was heartbreaking. Simultaneously so excited and so sad about the upcoming finale. Agree entirely. Mostly I just get irrationally annoyed at people who act like supernatural or genre elements are like an affront to the drama's integrity. People are still insistent that the UFO is actually a metaphor, even though it's clearly established to exist within the world we're viewing. There are larger questions to be asked about it, like if the whole thing is a book then is there a chance the UFO is just the product of the story being filtered through so many views? I think taking that into consideration is important, but come on, it's clearly "real" within the context of that scene in that all of those characters are seeing it at the same time. Not to mention it distracting Rye in the pilot. It's hard for me to find anymore weight behind the "It was the balloon!" arguments after last night's episode. The other thing too is that complaining about it almost feels like a reductive way to analyze the show. Like instead of accepting these supernatural elements and looking at the ways it adds onto the shows discussion and depth, they'd rather there have been a more realistic solution. Which would have been someone shooting Bear in the back at the last second. Which would have been incredibly cliche. IDK, it just feels ironic or something that the supernatural elements are seen as compromising some of the shows integrity, but a generic last minute save would somehow have been better.
|
|
Ben Grimm
TI Forumite
Posts: 7,541
Member is Online
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 8, 2015 22:20:23 GMT -5
Fantastic episode. I loved how they used the UFO, loved the sense of dread, and was almost astonished at how brutal the whole thing was. The narration, while completely unexpected, also completely worked for me.
I can't figure out whether they've left too much or too little for the finale, which is probably about right. I suspect we're going to see Ed and Peggy get the "Josh Brolin in No Country for Old Men" treatment, but that's just a guess.
|
|
|
Post by MrsLangdonAlger on Dec 8, 2015 23:13:41 GMT -5
Great, great stuff. Yes or no on the UFO? For me it's a resounding YES - so tired of shows pussyfooting around with mystical, paranormal events and then not having the guts to go there (and yes, I'm talking about True Detective 1, among others.) Besides, "realism" in fiction isn't strictly necessary. I've read and loved so many stories that blur the line between real and unreal that it doesn't bother me in the slightest. On the contrary, it makes me love this story more. And amidst a sea of tremendous performances, Zahn McClarnon quietly stole the show. The brief look he gave Floyd right before gutting her was heartbreaking. Simultaneously so excited and so sad about the upcoming finale. It's just a flying saucer, Ed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Fargo
Dec 10, 2015 16:25:10 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2015 16:25:10 GMT -5
As far as the Flying Saucer goes, it feels so inconsequential that it doesn't matter. Sure, it is what caused rye to stand in the road and saved Lou, but they could have wrote Rye as being disoriented or had Lou struggle to get to his gun and it all would have the same amount of impact. It is just being weird for the sake of being weird. And for the most part that is part of the charm of Fargo, some shit it just does because it can, but a flying saucer? Ehhh, it is just a flying saucer, ed.
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 1:25:05 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by odnetnin on Dec 15, 2015 1:25:05 GMT -5
Holy shit wasn't that finale insane?! I am not being rhetorical; I have not seen it yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 5:58:37 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2015 5:58:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Dec 15, 2015 10:24:41 GMT -5
I found Mike Milligan's life sentence in that office so disturbing it kept me awake last night.
|
|
Post-Lupin
Prolific Poster
Immanentizing the Eschaton
Posts: 5,673
|
Post by Post-Lupin on Dec 15, 2015 13:11:24 GMT -5
I found Mike Milligan's life sentence in that office so disturbing it kept me awake last night. The parallel I took from it was the final shot of The Shield. Loved this season so much. Can we have a moment for the actual "Fargo, North Dakota" Carter Burwell cue from the film having its moment?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2015 13:43:25 GMT -5
Wrote this in the AVC episode write-up, but now that it's all done, I think the most fascinating aspect of this season is that ultimately we don't realize which character's story this is until the very end. In retrospect given how he ends this season and combined with where we know he lands by S2, at its core season 1 is showing us the rise of Hanzee/Mr. Tripoli as he becomes the powerful head of the Fargo mob. Yet he's only a bit character for the first portion of the series, and until near the end of his arc the audience is led to perceive him as, at best, highly competent muscle. It's an incredibly interesting turn of the screw seeing Hanzee move from his role as Dodd's man to agent of chaos to eventually, one of the prime movers behind the scenes come S2.
(that said, the reveal of Hanzee's new identity was my biggest gripe with the finale, as plastic surgery or not, it's quite the stretch to see Hanzee transforming into a pudgy white guy.)
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 14:25:23 GMT -5
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 15, 2015 14:25:23 GMT -5
Frankly, the UFO is in Fargo because there was a UFO in The Man Who Wasn't There; and like that film the UFO was seen by someone about to die who tells no one. There was a clear thematic point to the UFO in that film, wrapped up in its 1950s paranoia, but here it simply is, as if to say, "Remember when?", lacking intrinsic value in itself. It's typical of the show's most annoying tendency, referencing the Coen Brothers simply to reference the Coen Brothers, trying to somehow force or reverse engineer their distinctive style simply by pointing and going "Look we did the thing! We did that other thing! That thing too!" The most egregious example is their endless repetition of the opening text to the film Fargo; a joke that played on the audience's ignorance once and now exists as an ossified reminder that, yes, this was based on a Coen Brothers film. Now let's see that fucking text again and again until you can recite it from memory like us.
I don't know what a satisfying version of Fargo would look like - both seasons have had elements, especially the strong casts and direction, and the writing is not all bad, but it continues to misplay its 'quirky' hand (just saw the ninth episode last night, with the 'historical' narrator.)
Fargo's not a bad series - though certainly not a deep series - but it keeps shooting itself in the foot in one of those two ways, and with the rapturous praise this season has received is likely to double down it.
|
|
Post-Lupin
Prolific Poster
Immanentizing the Eschaton
Posts: 5,673
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 15:04:56 GMT -5
Post by Post-Lupin on Dec 15, 2015 15:04:56 GMT -5
Frankly, the UFO is in Fargo because there was a UFO in The Man Who Wasn't There; and like that film the UFO was seen by someone about to die who tells no one. There was a clear thematic point to the UFO in that film, wrapped up in its 1950s paranoia, but here it simply is, as if to say, "Remember when?", lacking intrinsic value in itself. It's typical of the show's most annoying tendency, referencing the Coen Brothers simply to reference the Coen Brothers, trying to somehow force or reverse engineer their distinctive style simply by pointing and going "Look we did the thing! We did that other thing! That thing too!" The most egregious example is their endless repetition of the opening text to the film Fargo; a joke that played on the audience's ignorance once and now exists as an ossified reminder that, yes, this was based on a Coen Brothers film. Now let's see that fucking text again and again until you can recite it from memory like us. I thought Patrick Wilson's heartfelt reading made the whole thing work. The most annoying one was Mike saying 'Friendo', honestly.
|
|
|
Post by nowimnothing on Dec 15, 2015 15:16:25 GMT -5
Frankly, the UFO is in Fargo because there was a UFO in The Man Who Wasn't There; and like that film the UFO was seen by someone about to die who tells no one. There was a clear thematic point to the UFO in that film, wrapped up in its 1950s paranoia, but here it simply is, as if to say, "Remember when?", lacking intrinsic value in itself. It's typical of the show's most annoying tendency, referencing the Coen Brothers simply to reference the Coen Brothers, trying to somehow force or reverse engineer their distinctive style simply by pointing and going "Look we did the thing! We did that other thing! That thing too!" The most egregious example is their endless repetition of the opening text to the film Fargo; a joke that played on the audience's ignorance once and now exists as an ossified reminder that, yes, this was based on a Coen Brothers film. Now let's see that fucking text again and again until you can recite it from memory like us. I don't know what a satisfying version of Fargo would look like - both seasons have had elements, especially the strong casts and direction, and the writing is not all bad, but it continues to misplay its 'quirky' hand (just saw the ninth episode last night, with the 'historical' narrator.) Fargo's not a bad series - though certainly not a deep series - but it keeps shooting itself in the foot in one of those two ways, and with the rapturous praise this season has received is likely to double down it. I guess I am not that cynical about it. I see the references as attempts to place the show in the Coen universe. The first season was more directly an homage to Fargo. For a second season they could have continued that route or (what you probably would have preferred,) struck out in their own unique direction. But instead they decided to play in the larger Coen sandbox. I can't really fault anyone for that. It looks like a fun place. I don't fault Benioff and Weiss for playing in George RR Martin's sandbox.
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Dec 15, 2015 15:45:13 GMT -5
Here's a thought that's just occurred to me: Ed and his dream of owning a butcher shop dies in the meat locker of a supermarket. But had he lived, that dream would have died in the meat locker of a supermarket anyway, because the 80's and 90's were not kind to independent foodsellers.
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 16:32:37 GMT -5
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 15, 2015 16:32:37 GMT -5
I see the references as attempts to place the show in the Coen universe. There isn't really any such thing as a 'Coens universe' and they are never that cutesy about their own films. Game of Thrones doesn't have Beinoff and Weiss inserting references to Martin's other fiction regardless of context, too. It just reminds me of how I felt when I heard Amazon was going to publish Vonnegut fan fiction.
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Dec 15, 2015 17:08:34 GMT -5
I sometimes think that the few of us who are extremely familiar with the vagaries of the Coen movies might be prone to overestimating how many of the little asides Hawley's thrown in are being picked up by the majority of the audience. Unlike the TI or the AVC, I'd guess 90+% of the people watching it don't hear "Friendo" or "Run Through the Jungle" or see a UFO and immediately think of the connection to the relevant movie. It's just a thing that happens for them.
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 15, 2015 20:51:46 GMT -5
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 15, 2015 20:51:46 GMT -5
Powerthirteen True - actually, last year a lot of AVCers didn't get the A Serious Man style moral parable bit - but that's why it is there. The UFO isn't symbolic of something else.
|
|
|
Fargo
Dec 16, 2015 0:59:36 GMT -5
Post by odnetnin on Dec 16, 2015 0:59:36 GMT -5
The Tripoli twist was monumentally stupid.
|
|
|
Post by nowimnothing on Dec 16, 2015 8:30:06 GMT -5
Powerthirteen True - actually, last year a lot of AVCers didn't get the A Serious Man style moral parable bit - but that's why it is there. The UFO isn't symbolic of something else. This makes a good case for the UFO being symbolic of God or some cosmic morality: theweek.com/articles/584099/truth-there-ufos-aliens-fxs-fargo-explainedThe characters are being observed and judged. In that way you could also say the UFO is symbolic of us as viewers. We watch the show and and make second-hand judgments about the morality of characters and actions. Of course you can never just observe. The mere act of observation influences what you see. Each time the UFO observes it changes the course of events. Were the changes intentional? The first observation with Rye seems to be a cosmic moral correction as this murderer is hit by a car, but it leads to much more death and destruction through the law of unintended consequences. The observation at the end saves Lou and allows Peggy and Ed to escape (at least temporarily.) Has the UFO learned from the first interaction? Given Betsy's dream I am not sure we can say for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Lady Bones on Dec 25, 2015 23:29:20 GMT -5
*Reluctantly admits that she watched the first two episodes of season 2 today and that she actually really liked them*
|
|
Ben Grimm
TI Forumite
Posts: 7,541
Member is Online
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 26, 2015 8:56:05 GMT -5
*Reluctantly admits that she watched the first two episodes of season 2 today and that she actually really liked them*
|
|
|
Post by Meth Lab Shenanigans on Dec 31, 2015 18:36:14 GMT -5
The Tripoli twist was monumentally stupid. Yeah, it really was. That was my only gripe with the season. I thought it was an A+ year with the exception of that.
|
|
|
Fargo
Jan 1, 2016 0:58:31 GMT -5
Post by Powerthirteen on Jan 1, 2016 0:58:31 GMT -5
Powerthirteen True - actually, last year a lot of AVCers didn't get the A Serious Man style moral parable bit - but that's why it is there. The UFO isn't symbolic of something else. This makes a good case for the UFO being symbolic of God or some cosmic morality: theweek.com/articles/584099/truth-there-ufos-aliens-fxs-fargo-explainedThe characters are being observed and judged. In that way you could also say the UFO is symbolic of us as viewers. We watch the show and and make second-hand judgments about the morality of characters and actions. Of course you can never just observe. The mere act of observation influences what you see. Each time the UFO observes it changes the course of events. Were the changes intentional? The first observation with Rye seems to be a cosmic moral correction as this murderer is hit by a car, but it leads to much more death and destruction through the law of unintended consequences. The observation at the end saves Lou and allows Peggy and Ed to escape (at least temporarily.) Has the UFO learned from the first interaction? Given Betsy's dream I am not sure we can say for sure. That idea makes for a neat parallel with the way that both seasons' protagonists, in their own ways, dig their own graves by trying to fix their lives.
|
|