|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Apr 1, 2016 21:59:03 GMT -5
The TI Book Club selection for April and May of 2016 is Philip K. Dick's 1969 novel Ubik about psychic and anti-psychic corporate spies in a future society run by out-of-control consumerism.
I picked up a copy of this from the library a couple of days ago and I'm a couple of chapters in. It's interesting but so far I'm not loving it. I'll post some more in-depth thoughts when I get about halfway through.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 22:17:26 GMT -5
A few years after I read this book a had a nightmare about it that ended with a baby taking itself apart and Shannon and I wrote a story based on the dream, which I guess means that I helped write a Ubik fanfic
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Apr 4, 2016 0:39:43 GMT -5
I'm about halfway through, having just finished Chapter 8, so don't click on the spoiler if you haven't read that far. I was really excited to read this book, but, to be honest, I've been really disappointed with much of the first half. The world that Philip K. Dick has created is very haphazardly sketched; Runciter is said to be a brilliant businessman, and it's implied that Runciter Associates is one of the best prudence agencies in the world. But I haven't seen any evidence that Runciter isn't absolutely horrible at his job, as he falls for the obvious trap of the Luna job, and doesn't even know half of his mere 40 employees; I'm having a lot of trouble believing he was ever more than barely competent at what he does. At one point Joe Chip muses that Runciter got greedy in accepting the Luna job, and that was why he didn't recognize what was so very, very obviously a trap, but if that's so, then PKD did a really poor job driving this (presumably thematically cogent) point home, because it's hard to get much of a read on Runciter as a character due to how poorly-written he is. It also seems impossible to imagine that unscrupulous precogs wouldn't have taken over the world, or that agencies like Runciter's wouldn't at least be more involved in protecting high-level politicians rather than companies, unless the world is literally run by corporations in this scenario. And the economics of the world make literally no sense. I get that PKD's satirizing all-pervasive consumerism, but the idea of a door refusing to open to let someone out of their apartment unless they pay up is absolutely asinine; there's no way for someone to pay the door for access to his apartment if he can't leave his apartment to go to work. Then there's just blatant inconsistencies like when Joe Chip says that the mortuary place is playing the same exact piece over their loudspeakers as the mortuary's helicopter's sound system despite one of the pieces being by Verdi and the other being by Beethoven. I guess none of these things on their own is a huge deal, but taken together all the lazy writing is really distracting and annoying. Also the Ubik ads at the beginning of each chapter are doing nothing for me; I gather they're supposed to be cutting satire of an all-purpose consumer product, but they just remind me of the Thneeds from The Lorax, and I don't think PKD's going for that sort of whimsy. However, the developments to the story in Chapter 8 may be turning the book around a bit for me. The death of Wendy Wright was legitimately pretty horrifying, and Runciter appearing on currency/matchbooks/phones is compellingly bizarre. So PKD's at least regained some of my interest for the time being, and hopefully the second half will be markedly better than the first.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,560
|
Post by repulsionist on Apr 4, 2016 14:31:42 GMT -5
Roy Batty's Pet Dove, you've found the "Dick Weakness" (repulsionist TM/SM/RR), I see. In almost all of his novels, there's some underlying plot point that simply torpedoes immersion in the paranoiac adventure. When I first read UBIK around 25 years ago as a late teen, I loved the sentimental tension between Chip and Conley, but Runciter's airy flip-flop in his pivotal role is one of those creeping, then unavoidable,"take out" moments (e.g. "Why are all these extremely talented people following a dangerous fool?"). And, while sloppy though his writing may be, Dick's point here in lack of characterization is the answer to my preceding play question: "The people/power structures running your life don't know where it's going, either. Use your skills to defend against and avoid this outcome, if you have the presence of mind to do so with the help of this fictional troubleshooting manual I continue to write. I, as writer PKD, do not/did not, and my subsequent loss of anchor in this ever-changing, cheap-assed world has given me reason to continue writing and makes my writing the annoying, yet intriguing, head swim that it is." I plan to re-read this book in the next 5 weeks.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,560
|
Post by repulsionist on Apr 7, 2016 15:58:59 GMT -5
It's everywhere. Advertisements included! UBIK. Made in Cleveland.*
* Beginning Chapter 2.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Luc de Lemur on May 16, 2016 11:41:26 GMT -5
I’m the one who nominated it, and I’m about halfway through with Ubik. Pick up your books or prepare to talk soon: book club’s about to be in session.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on May 16, 2016 12:58:21 GMT -5
I’m the one who nominated it, and I’m about halfway through with Ubik. Pick up your books or prepare to talk soon: book club’s about to be in session. Oh awesome! I was actually planning on posting my thoughts on it later on today (I finished it over a month ago, but I'm terrible about procrastinating).
|
|
|
Post by Jean Luc de Lemur on May 16, 2016 18:52:34 GMT -5
Roy Batty's Pet Dove I actually think the constant micropayments is interesting from a contemporary perspective. Paying to open a refrigerator door make me think of it as some kind of nickle-and-diming (literally) smart home—of course, the difference is that we’re the product, not the consumer when it comes to stuff like smart homes, which is kind of more Dick than Dick. Agreed on it being a bit scattered—although people complain about The Man in the High Castle being dull, I think its languorous pace really helps us ease into his world and keeps everything from tripping over itself (though admittedly that’s part of Dick’s appeal to a lot of people). That said a lot of stuff after the halfway point really does come nicely into focus after the big twist, though I’m still not finished yet.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on May 18, 2016 0:53:55 GMT -5
So anyway, I finished this over a month ago, and I ended up thinking that the second half of the novel was a huge improvement over the first. As reality begins to fall apart, the haphazardness of Dick's world-building ceases to matter as much, and the surreal unfolding of events is ultimately a lot more interesting than the 1992 that the reader is presented with at the beginning of the novel. Some of the best, and (oddly) most prescient moments from the book come from Joe Chip's experiences in the past. Take for instance his conversation with Mr. Bliss, that anti-Semitic guy and mouthpiece for America ca. 1939 who drives Joe to the Des Moines funeral home: "Those Communists are the real menace, not the Germans. Take the treatment of the Jews. You know who makes a lot out of that? Jews in this country, a lot of them not citizens but refugees living on public welfare. I think the Nazis certainly have been a little extreme in some of the things they've done to the Jews, but basically there's been the Jewish question for a long time, and something, although maybe not so vile as those concentration camps, had to be done about it. We have a similar problem here in the United States, both with Jews and with the n*****s. Eventually we're going to have to do something about both." It's the sort of sentiment that today is rarely ascribed to Americans living in such close proximity to the second World War, but wasn't uncommon at the time, and it's the sort of sentiment that when used to describe specifically Nazi Germany, Jews, and black people today is seen as objectively bigoted, but which is basically the same sort of alarmist sentiment which is today used in reference to Muslim refugees, welfare recipients, and (still) black people (albeit in slightly more coded language). Granted, I think it'd be ridiculous to say that Dick foresaw this very sociopolitical situation in the US in 2016, but I do think this passage points out that alarmist bigotry is universal to human nature, as there is always some group for people to level baseless fears against. At one point in the novel, Dick explicitly invokes the idea of Platonic essentialism to explain the degradation of Joe Chip's reality in a retrograde succession of forms, in transportation, in communication, in the manifestation of a hyper-consumerist culture, in the convictions of bigots. And this in some ways works really well for the novel, where Joe is unable to escape Ubik, the product that in its timeless, all-purpose, immensely profitable, nature, is essentially the Platonic ideal of the consumer product itself. No matter where Joe goes, Ubik will be there to help him survive half-life, and in so doing fulfill his purpose of serving his boss even from beyond the grave. It's a chilling concept and truly cleverly conceived on Dick's part.
But this retrograde succession of forms constituting a devolution of forms towards ever more primitive origins didn't really work for me on anything other than a surface level, because that's not how evolution (even broadly conceived) works. Platonic essentialism can be a neat idea to explore, especially if you're writing as surreal a novel as Ubik, but even as someone who isn't especially well-versed in philosophy, I'm aware that it's also a completely bullshit idea that fettered progress in various fields of human thought for centuries, especially evolution. Evolution is anathema to Platonic essentialism, where any sort of deviation from an ideal form is nothing but a negligible aberration. So this devolution of various forms of technology doesn't really make a lot of sense in Platonic terms. Granted, one should be careful not to conflate biological evolution with the evolution of technology or human ideas, but I'm not entirely sure that Dick would even have made the distinction, and his engagement with the actual logic behind his fictional universe seems shallow enough that he probably never thought about the complete incompatibility of a "devolution" of this world with Platonic essentialism. Which I suppose gets back to my earlier complaint that Dick was kind of lazy in constructing his fictional world.
And one more quibble: I thought the ending with Runciter seeing Joe Chip's face on a coin was pretty trite and hackneyed, not quite on an "it was all a dream", or "the whole thing was happening inside of a snow globe" level, but almost that bad.
Ultimately, though, I thought Ubik was quite good. I'm not sure it deserves quite the reputation that its earned as a great work of literature, but it was ultimately entertaining, unsettling, and (most of the time) intellectually intriguing.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Luc de Lemur on May 21, 2016 13:23:24 GMT -5
Reading Ubik brought me back to when I read an anthology of British new wave SF a few years ago—I see why it was so influential and great at the time but it didn’t quite connect with me now. It’s a bit more like I always feared PKD would be like before I finally picked up The Man in the High Castle last year. The slow pace, relatively early publication date, and the fact that it’s a novel of subtle dislocation and awkward cultural encounters make it the ideal expat novel, so I was pretty well-primed for it. SPOILERS, OBVS. But the conceit about Ubik—a sort of god-like consumer product—kind of worked for me, maybe because it seemed very Kraftwerk-esque. The “The Model” it might be satire, it might be honest. I agree that the end, though—definitely going for a sort of “Are men the dream of Brahma, or is Brahma the dream of men?” kind of sentiment—didn’t totally work. It mainly felt like a failure in execution to me—going for lingering uncertainty but just coming across as a half-assed “Or am I?” sort of ending. Of course, as Joe tells Runciter at one point, “You don’t know the answers […] That’s the problem. You made up answers; you had to invent them to explain your presence here. All your presences here, your so-called manifestation.” The ideal of half-death as a sort of temporary reality (prior to reincarnation?) was pretty interesting. It felt fairly personal, like Dick going back to his own nostalgic recollections, and was a bit reminiscent of light flashing before one’s eyes. I wonder if Dick was also going for something about causality and the arrow of time not being as straightforward as we think, though that interpretation may be influenced by reading this Nautilus article (not sure about it—it’s weird to read an article about the physics of time without mentioning thermodynamics). On a lighter note the German names were pretty fun—Dr. Schoenheit van Vogelsang is “Dr. Beauty from Birdsong,” I didn’t make a note of it but IIRC there was a Dr. Fremdheit (i.e. a “Dr. Strange”) and a Carl Jung hospital, which gives away a bit of Dick’s schema. Still, this was the first book I’ve read in a while that I don’t feel like I totally understand, and that’s not a bad thing.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,560
|
Post by repulsionist on May 25, 2016 17:08:48 GMT -5
Oh I have a confession to make, Roy Batty's Pet Dove : "I did not read this book when I said I would." Sorry, fellas. Your insights were both wonderful and intriguing in themselves. Re. Dick and the Platonic Essentialism logical disconnect...As Jean Luc de Lemur mentioned some people find Dick's logic crash-ups fun in themselves, and in this regard I think it quite pertinent to reference his chronic amphetamine use. What I'm elliptically saying is that his wild and only, mostly coherent flights of intellect do sail so high then crash so, sometimes, direly could probably be directly attributed to how he wrote - which can be a lure for readers, too. Yuk-nuk chit-chat - One could analogize that most of Dick's work is akin to a crack student whose Adderall or Modafinil use allows them to ace a difficult Differential Equations exam but forget to tabulate a final product correctly. Also, Jean Luc de Lemur , Art Zoyd produced an interpretation of UBIK, called U.B.I.Q.U.e. in 2000. I looked around. Couldn't find it.
|
|