|
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Aug 22, 2016 13:13:11 GMT -5
I highly doubt Gabby Douglas refused to put her hand over her heart because she was too lazy to bother, in fact it might have something to do with the state-perpetuated mass murder of people with whom she shares a skin tone. I'm just spitballing here. Well, considering she's representing the country you theorize she hates, if that's really what was happening, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. The whole point is that we're all Americans.
|
|
heroboy
AV Clubber
I must succeed!
Posts: 1,185
|
Post by heroboy on Aug 22, 2016 13:16:10 GMT -5
I highly doubt Gabby Douglas refused to put her hand over her heart because she was too lazy to bother, in fact it might have something to do with the state-perpetuated mass murder of people with whom she shares a skin tone. I'm just spitballing here. Well, considering she's representing the country you theorize she hates, if that's really what was happening, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. The whole point is that we're all Americans.I would guess that both of you are projecting, and reality is that she either didn't know that was something that needed to be done, or just plain forgot in the thrill of the moment.
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Aug 22, 2016 13:22:59 GMT -5
I highly doubt Gabby Douglas refused to put her hand over her heart because she was too lazy to bother, in fact it might have something to do with the state-perpetuated mass murder of people with whom she shares a skin tone. I'm just spitballing here. Well, considering she's representing the country you theorize she hates, if that's really what was happening, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. The whole point is that we're all Americans.Americans who have a right to political dissent, yes.
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Aug 22, 2016 13:28:05 GMT -5
19 year old Gabby fails to put her hand on her heart, shame on her! 32 year old Lochte gets wasted and lies about it, nah he's chill. Meh.
|
|
|
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Aug 22, 2016 13:32:23 GMT -5
19 year old Gabby fails to put her hand on her heart, shame on her! 32 year old Lochte gets wasted and lies about it, nah he's chill. Meh. Yeah, because everyone's rushing to defend him. He's definitely not experiencing a rightful and near-universal condemnation from his own country. If that were the case, there wouldn't be a double standard to complain about!
|
|
Ice Cream Planet
AV Clubber
I get glimpses of the horror of normalcy.
Posts: 3,833
|
Post by Ice Cream Planet on Aug 22, 2016 13:46:33 GMT -5
I highly doubt Gabby Douglas refused to put her hand over her heart because she was too lazy to bother, in fact it might have something to do with the state-perpetuated mass murder of people with whom she shares a skin tone. I'm just spitballing here. Well, considering she's representing the country you theorize she hates, if that's really what was happening, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. The whole point is that we're all Americans.One, if she was in fact not putting her hand on her chest as a quiet protest against the way black people are treated in the US, how do you know this means she 'hates' America. It could mean she's disappointed with a facet of American society and doesn't feel like engaging with something as hollow as making a hand gesture during the national anthem. It wasn't like she was rolling her eyes or raising her middle finger. Two, your point makes no sense. One of the great things about being an American is being able to protest, especially if you are representing the country on a global stage. It's sure better than worrying about how a potential lack of decorum could put in the labor camp. Admit it, based on your comments here, there is a tiny part of you that wishes the US was like a dictatorship. Your whole comment basically boils down to 'we are all Americans, until the American does something "un-American."'
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Aug 22, 2016 13:54:28 GMT -5
Okay, I'm guilty of egging this on a little bit myself. Now, however, I am stepping in with a moderator hat: this is a Sports thread. If we're to talk politics (and I realize that the Olympics is commonly politicized) take it to a General Politics thread. Either that, or both sides can forget it, it's Americatown.
|
|
dLᵒ
Prolific Poster
𝓐𝓻𝓮 𝓦𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓸𝓵 𝓨𝓮𝓽?
Posts: 4,533
|
Post by dLᵒ on Aug 22, 2016 14:19:12 GMT -5
One thing I'm thankful for about the Olympics is the boost of confidence over the fact that no matter how fit you are, you still jiggle a bit.
|
|
|
Post by Lt. Broccoli on Aug 22, 2016 19:37:22 GMT -5
After thinking about it some more, protocol for the Canadian anthem is something like this:
1. Nothing. 2. If you must do something, sing, loudly and badly.
Personally I don't sing it because the concept of national anthems is stupid.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Aug 22, 2016 20:04:20 GMT -5
I hate that NBC wastes airtime on medal ceremonies (among other things) when there's so much sport they don't show, but I do appreciate that everyone from every country mouths along to the words of their national anthem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2016 20:56:42 GMT -5
I highly doubt Gabby Douglas refused to put her hand over her heart because she was too lazy to bother, in fact it might have something to do with the state-perpetuated mass murder of people with whom she shares a skin tone. I'm just spitballing here. Well, considering she's representing the country you theorize she hates, if that's really what was happening, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. The whole point is that we're all Americans. now I get why you think trump will win Also, as someone who has a job where a requirement is to salute the flag, you are getting way too worked up about this. Gabby Douglas is good at a sport and the Olympics is where she can show she is one of the best at what she does. She just happens to live in America, she does not have to be patriotic about it, she just has to be good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2016 20:58:07 GMT -5
Okay, I'm guilty of egging this on a little bit myself. Now, however, I am stepping in with a moderator hat: this is a Sports thread. If we're to talk politics (and I realize that the Olympics is commonly politicized) take it to a General Politics thread. Either that, or both sides can forget it, it's Americatown. whoops, read this after my post. Will not post here anymore.
|
|
Baron von Costume
TI Forumite
Like an iron maiden made of pillows... the punishment is decadence!
Posts: 4,684
|
Post by Baron von Costume on Aug 23, 2016 9:17:52 GMT -5
I hate that NBC wastes airtime on medal ceremonies (among other things) when there's so much sport they don't show, but I do appreciate that everyone from every country mouths along to the words of their national anthem. How can you tell? Any medal ceremony I've ever watched on NBC is a closeup of the American medal winner with zero acknowledgement after the initial shot that anyone else is on the podium.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Aug 23, 2016 9:35:02 GMT -5
I hate that NBC wastes airtime on medal ceremonies (among other things) when there's so much sport they don't show, but I do appreciate that everyone from every country mouths along to the words of their national anthem. How can you tell? Any medal ceremony I've ever watched on NBC is a closeup of the American medal winner with zero acknowledgement after the initial shot that anyone else is on the podium. Ha, yeah mostly. But I also saw ceremonies for Bolt and some other non-US gold winners.
|
|
dLᵒ
Prolific Poster
𝓐𝓻𝓮 𝓦𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓸𝓵 𝓨𝓮𝓽?
Posts: 4,533
|
Post by dLᵒ on Aug 27, 2016 2:09:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Not a real doctor on Aug 27, 2016 9:20:12 GMT -5
Very cool dLᵒ! And I don't care what the author thinks, the 32 lake placid logo needs to be on my wall, it fits my "dad-like" design sensibilities.
|
|
|
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Aug 27, 2016 9:29:09 GMT -5
I can't resist the simple, wonderfully dated elegance of the Tokyo 1964 logo.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Aug 27, 2016 11:52:28 GMT -5
Rome 1960 does it for me. Romulus and Remus suckling from the she-wolf, pretty awesome. Aside from that, gotta go with Atlanta 1996: home pride!
Montreal 1976 kinda looks like it's flipping me off.
Los Angeles 1984 wins for "Most 80s". London 2012 wins for "Worst Overall".
|
|
dLᵒ
Prolific Poster
𝓐𝓻𝓮 𝓦𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓸𝓵 𝓨𝓮𝓽?
Posts: 4,533
|
Post by dLᵒ on Aug 27, 2016 14:12:25 GMT -5
Very cool dLᵒ ! And I don't care what the author thinks, the 32 lake placid logo needs to be on my wall, it fits my "dad-like" design sensibilities. I like it and looks great as a suitcase sticker, but I really wish the map didn't make america look so fat. I can't resist the simple, wonderfully dated elegance of the Tokyo 1964 logo. Yeah and the other japanese ones have been so great, so it perplexes me that both versions have looked so dated and that I expect more forward thinking design out of Japan. This one was floated and I think it's the best and a tragedy that it's not used. (The flowers are the seal of the royal family) Rome 1960 does it for me. Romulus and Remus suckling from the she-wolf, pretty awesome. Aside from that, gotta go with Atlanta 1996: home pride! Montreal 1976 kinda looks like it's flipping me off. Los Angeles 1984 wins for "Most 80s". London 2012 wins for "Worst Overall". I feel that Montreal 76 and Mexico 68 are pretty bad and the symbolism just does not stand out at all (the black parts of Mexico are a conjoined 68). LA 84 looks generic, but it still really works probably because Saul Bass worked on it. Atlanta is probably my second favorite of the summers (the colors are odd but they work), and London (plus '36 berlin) are my least favorite.
I also feel that Calgary 88 works well and that his reasoning is stupid (and I get a maple leaf vibe from it). and that Seoul is kind of bad. Barcelona is nice but it gives me papyrus font vibes and that's no bueno. And one that I'm surprised I don't remember is Torino 06, but it looks like it's for generic cheap electronics. And Sochi '12 looks like the GTA font. I was thinking that the 2002 salt lake games logo is rose tinted by living through it, but really it is great. Interestingly in the past forty or so years when cities make a bid they submit a logo for that's pretty much one time use, and this was is SLC's.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Aug 28, 2016 1:29:11 GMT -5
I, too, love the 1964 Tokyo one.
My other favorites are 1992 Barcelona and 2004 Athens. The Athens one is really beautiful, and I didn't remember it at all.
|
|
Baron von Costume
TI Forumite
Like an iron maiden made of pillows... the punishment is decadence!
Posts: 4,684
|
Post by Baron von Costume on Aug 29, 2016 10:14:02 GMT -5
His commentary on Berlin seems like kind of a no duh...Berlin – "The Olympic rings become subordinated to the eagle and bell forms." By the host's priorities for the games I'd say that one is a success Seconding that I think the Calgary one is pretty great, especially for the generally fucking awful design of the era Nagano is definitely a fave too.
|
|
heroboy
AV Clubber
I must succeed!
Posts: 1,185
|
Post by heroboy on Aug 29, 2016 11:58:23 GMT -5
His commentary on Berlin seems like kind of a no duh...Berlin – "The Olympic rings become subordinated to the eagle and bell forms." By the host's priorities for the games I'd say that one is a success Seconding that I think the Calgary one is pretty great, especially for the generally fucking awful design of the era Nagano is definitely a fave too. I'm trying to understand his criticism that the Calgary '88 design is too Islamic. I see a stylized maple leaf.
Also, the large Cs represent Canada, and the small cs represent Calgary.
Also also, David Foster's Winter Games theme song is one of the best Olympic Themes of all time.
60/100 Overall its okay.
Anyways, Barcelona '92 is the best. Great use of color in a simplistic yet evocative design. Nagano is also pretty great.
|
|
|
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Sept 9, 2016 17:12:54 GMT -5
You know, a lot of people are complaining that pros won't be able to compete in baseball at Tokyo, but I like it! Have all college players. It's much more in keeping with the original Olympic mission, and it'll be totally unpredictable.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Sept 20, 2016 9:54:45 GMT -5
You know, a lot of people are complaining that pros won't be able to compete in baseball at Tokyo, but I like it! Have all college players. It's much more in keeping with the original Olympic mission, and it'll be totally unpredictable. At least they'll have a chance to win medal bonus money from the US Olympic Committee, which is more than they'll get from the corrupt organization they usually play for.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Sept 25, 2016 22:02:06 GMT -5
You know, a lot of people are complaining that pros won't be able to compete in baseball at Tokyo, but I like it! Have all college players. It's much more in keeping with the original Olympic mission, and it'll be totally unpredictable. At least they'll have a chance to win medal bonus money from the US Olympic Committee, which is more than they'll get from the corrupt organization they usually play for. It really puts it in perspective when you can say with total honesty that these players come from an organization MORE corrupt than the IOC. Like, I read your post and my first thought was, "God, will they even be allowed to keep the money?"
|
|
|
Post by MarkInTexas on Jul 31, 2017 16:53:30 GMT -5
The 2024 Summer Olympics are going to Paris, and the 2028 Games are going to Los Angeles, the first US-based Olympics since the 2002 Salt Lake Games. Rumor has it that LA got 2028 to make double extra sure that the Cheeto-in-chief wouldn't still be in office.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Jul 31, 2017 19:01:53 GMT -5
The 2024 Summer Olympics are going to Paris, and the 2028 Games are going to Los Angeles, the first US-based Olympics since the 2002 Salt Lake Games. Rumor has it that LA got 2028 to make double extra sure that the Cheeto-in-chief wouldn't still be in office. I’m honestly kind of surprised they even made a commitment to 2028 at all, given that even if Cheeto-in-chief is gone it’s unlikely the US will ever abandon its borders paranoia/harassment of outsiders. I’m also surprised because a friend-of-a-mentor knew both the IOC and the BIE (the group that does world expos) well, and a lot of people there just don’t like the US getting things on principle, a bit like the Nobel Committee (thus Chicago’s Olympics bid was even more doomed than everyone thought). Given the shift of the Olympics back to developed countries which have hosted it before I actually don’t think it would be a bad idea to just permanently fix it in one place some permanent infrasture. Paris would make sense as the original hosting place and also somewhere where the stadiums would get a lot of use in off-years. I think Athens might be the best choice given the amount of infrastructure already there and it’s location right close to the center of the World Island, plus the whole Ancient Olympics connection. A friend is actually a fan of LA being a permanent location as a sort of nexus of the Americas and Asia which isn’t too much of a hassle for Europeans and Asians. Plus we do have most of the infrastructure here already—although people have already been making the “Olympics = gentrification” argument I actually don’t think it would be that true because the Olympics would basically be plug-and-play. And during the 1984 Olympics traffic actually wasn’t bad, mainly because of a sort of backfire effect where people wouldn’t make trips because they anticipated Olympic traffic being horrible.
|
|
|
Post by Superb Owl 🦉 on Aug 1, 2017 8:58:21 GMT -5
The 2024 Summer Olympics are going to Paris, and the 2028 Games are going to Los Angeles, the first US-based Olympics since the 2002 Salt Lake Games. Rumor has it that LA got 2028 to make double extra sure that the Cheeto-in-chief wouldn't still be in office. I’m honestly kind of surprised they even made a commitment to 2028 at all, given that even if Cheeto-in-chief is gone it’s unlikely the US will ever abandon its borders paranoia/harassment of outsiders. I’m also surprised because a friend-of-a-mentor knew both the IOC and the BIE (the group that does world expos) well, and a lot of people there just don’t like the US getting things on principle, a bit like the Nobel Committee (thus Chicago’s Olympics bid was even more doomed than everyone thought). Given the shift of the Olympics back to developed countries which have hosted it before I actually don’t think it would be a bad idea to just permanently fix it in one place some permanent infrasture. Paris would make sense as the original hosting place and also somewhere where the stadiums would get a lot of use in off-years. I think Athens might be the best choice given the amount of infrastructure already there and it’s location right close to the center of the World Island, plus the whole Ancient Olympics connection. A friend is actually a fan of LA being a permanent location as a sort of nexus of the Americas and Asia which isn’t too much of a hassle for Europeans and Asians. Plus we do have most of the infrastructure here already—although people have already been making the “Olympics = gentrification” argument I actually don’t think it would be that true because the Olympics would basically be plug-and-play. And during the 1984 Olympics traffic actually wasn’t bad, mainly because of a sort of backfire effect where people wouldn’t make trips because they anticipated Olympic traffic being horrible. It seems like they are more worried, and rightfully so, about nobody wanting to host these things at all in the future. In that context, you absolutely try to lock up LA and Paris for the next two games if you think you can. It also sounds like LA being the ones to get pushed back to 2028 had less to do with anything Trump and more to do with Paris making a big stink about wanting 2024 or nothing. I agree that 1 or 2 permanent hosts makes the most sense at this point. I have to think Athens is a non-starter though, isn't most of their Olympics infrastructure already in ruins? Honestly, who complains if they just said Paris and LA alternate from now on?
|
|
|
Post by Kangaroosevelt-Ecks on Aug 1, 2017 10:04:32 GMT -5
I’m honestly kind of surprised they even made a commitment to 2028 at all, given that even if Cheeto-in-chief is gone it’s unlikely the US will ever abandon its borders paranoia/harassment of outsiders. I’m also surprised because a friend-of-a-mentor knew both the IOC and the BIE (the group that does world expos) well, and a lot of people there just don’t like the US getting things on principle, a bit like the Nobel Committee (thus Chicago’s Olympics bid was even more doomed than everyone thought). Given the shift of the Olympics back to developed countries which have hosted it before I actually don’t think it would be a bad idea to just permanently fix it in one place some permanent infrasture. Paris would make sense as the original hosting place and also somewhere where the stadiums would get a lot of use in off-years. I think Athens might be the best choice given the amount of infrastructure already there and it’s location right close to the center of the World Island, plus the whole Ancient Olympics connection. A friend is actually a fan of LA being a permanent location as a sort of nexus of the Americas and Asia which isn’t too much of a hassle for Europeans and Asians. Plus we do have most of the infrastructure here already—although people have already been making the “Olympics = gentrification” argument I actually don’t think it would be that true because the Olympics would basically be plug-and-play. And during the 1984 Olympics traffic actually wasn’t bad, mainly because of a sort of backfire effect where people wouldn’t make trips because they anticipated Olympic traffic being horrible. It seems like they are more worried, and rightfully so, about nobody wanting to host these things at all in the future. In that context, you absolutely try to lock up LA and Paris for the next two games if you think you can. It also sounds like LA being the ones to get pushed back to 2028 had less to do with anything Trump and more to do with Paris making a big stink about wanting 2024 or nothing. I agree that 1 or 2 permanent hosts makes the most sense at this point. I have to think Athens is a non-starter though, isn't most of their Olympics infrastructure already in ruins? Honestly, who complains if they just said Paris and LA alternate from now on? If I'm not mistaken Britain did pretty well too. They'd probably want some eastern hemisphere hosts as well... How well did Japan do with Nagano? Should we keep the hilarious money pit Sochi park open too?
|
|
|
Post by MarkInTexas on Aug 1, 2017 17:23:38 GMT -5
Awarding the 2028 Games four years early is a sign of desperation by the IOC. I think they were generally worried that, while LA is excited about hosting now, they wouldn't be in 2021, when the 2028 Games were originally scheduled to be awarded. Plus, the IOC is giving LA an interest-free loan, which I'm sure is not at all an incentive for the city not to get cold feet.
I'm sure the IOC has no desire to go to a permanent host, and this does give them some time to find the 2032 host, which, in theory, won't be awarded until 2025. I'm sure they're praying that Tokyo and Paris will be smashing financial successes for Japan and France, so cities will be willing to line up to bid again.
|
|