|
Post by Superb Owl 🦉 on Mar 10, 2021 10:34:08 GMT -5
What's The Show? WandaVisionWhat's It All About, Proley? Following the events of Avengers: Endgame and the death of Vision, Wanda retreats into a world of comforting sitcoms, generated by her extraordinary power. This means that a "hex" has been placed over the town of Westview and its inhabitants become her puppets, while out in the real world agents of S.W.O.R.D. attempt to discover what's going on with the weird red glowy thing that's covering a town in New Jersey. Turns out Wanda is generating sitcom episodes every "week" in a different style, while Agnes - revealed as Agatha, replete with her own theme song - is trying to steal Wanda's chaos magic, which means everything ends in different coloured fireballs being slung around. Why Did You Give It A Go? Even without having seen all the Marvel movies - which I have - it's a pretty zeitgeisty show so yeah, it was going to be worth checking out one way or another. Is It Any Good? For the most part it's excellent, then really rather ordinary. The most obvious thing to praise WandaVision for is that it's abstract in a way that we almost never get in the MCU. Which is to say, rather than always just literally being about a bunch of gifted/superpowered buddies doing things that save the planet, WandaVision uses Wanda's powers as an allegory, a method for exploring the almost unbearable grief and pain caused by the death of a loved one which she was powerless to prevent (and indeed tried to instigate). The MCU has always tended towards the literal, even when taking the time to explore personal relationships - most successfully, with Nebula and Gamora - so to see something with the genuine abstractness of WandaVision is both incredibly inventive and refreshing in a way that, to be honest, the MCU badly needs. It opens up whole new storytelling approaches and gives us insights into characters in new and enlightening ways. It's pretty much a cliché to say that Wanda and Vision's relationship across the Marvel movies wasn't ever given the emphasis it needed to make Vision's death at the end of Infinity War work as the emotional pivot of that film, but it's still true (resting this on Gamora and Nebula's evolving relationship in Endgame is infinitely more successful, and affecting). So it's simply wonderful to see Elizabeth Olsen give real dimension to Wanda - she seems more comfortable on the small screen, and Wanda comes alive in ways that she never quite did on the big screen. She does genuinely excellent work here. Paul Bettany, too, excels as Vision, demonstrating both impeccable comic ability and an almost bottomless well of compassion and understanding that makes the character incredibly easy to like and warm to. What a shame, then, that after seven excellent episodes, we get two that reduce everything to a Big Panto Villain, a bunch of special effects battles and a pat resolution whereby everything makes Marvel-sense but never quite satisfies, and Wanda doesn't even apologise to the townsfolk she held captive in her own personal psychological prison. For the most part, yes, this is a good show but the ending does real damage to it, even while being superficially logical. How Many Episodes Did You Watch? Well, all of them. It's only nine episodes long so it's not a vast investment, and I appreciate the fact that, final episode aside, WandaVision sticks to both a half-hour sitcom length (which is logical, but not all shows would have that kind of discipline) and only breaks out of that once the sitcom conceit has been dispensed with. It's another subtle meta-commentary, far more sleekit that the big-ticket sitcom parodies, and terribly clever and effective. Would You Recommend It? For the most part. Using sitcom tropes both as a method of protectiveness to explore Wanda's trauma, and as a fun recreation in their own right, is incredibly effective and the Wanda-ised versions of the sitcoms of yore is done fantastically well, and with real attention to detail. The gradual intrusion of the "other" into Wanda's safe space is done extremely well, it's often properly disconcerting, and the mystery cleverly realised. It takes until the fourth episode before we get any scenes set outside Westview - again, an admirable use of restraint - and when we do get them there's no instant reveal. We get an expansion of our perspective but no immediate payoff, which is also the correct approach. But the problem with the reveal is that there's actually two - the reveal of the sitcom / hex being generated by Wanda and the reveal of Agnes / Agatha as being a witch trying to steal Wanda's magic. And the fact is, however much fun she is, Agatha just doesn't belong in this. Handling Wanda's trauma and her ways of dealing with grief when there's no support system for her is a powerful, worthwhile story to tell. Agatha, a Big Panto Villain of the highest order with a lazy, cliché Salem backstory, is fantastically entertaining but all she really does is distract away from the far more compelling material around Wanda. Then in the last episode we get some two-witches-fighting stuff, some Vision-on-Vision action and it all deflates back down to standard Marvel tropes of a couple of big fights, a slightly rushed ending and a couple of tag scenes in the credits to set things up for the future. It could have been done by flow-chart and all feels predictable in a way the rest of the series never did so it can't help but come across as bathetic. The defeat of Agatha, via runes explained in a previous episode, is "clever", in that it's clearly set up and resolved and follows plot logistics, but it's also very mechanical and not really satisfying, and that's the biggest problem here. For the most part WandaVision makes excellent use of its cast (I haven't even mentioned the always-excellent Randall Park as Agent Woo, so here he is, mentioned and great) and really tries to dig into its lead character. But in failing to escape from standard-Marvel-ending syndrome a lot of that good work feels like it's in service of fairly little. WandaVision was meant to be about Wanda but ultimately she gets subsumed back into a standard superhero ending. How could that be anything but disappointing? Scores On The Doors? 7.5/10 - which, you know, is fine. But this show could have been 10/10 and isn't and that's frustrating. I was also bothered by the "well, she feels pretty darned bad about what happened, so we'll just let her wander off into the sunset" ending. I think that also represented kind of a botched landing on their Monica Rambeau origin story b-plot. I suppose one should be grateful that they didn't just go with a full on 'magic sets everything back like this never happened' ending. I wonder if there was a more ambiguous version of Agatha at some point in the project's development and they just couldn't square it with the sitcom conceit. It would have totally fit with what I've read about the classic comics version of the character to have her be a "helping, but not in the way she really needs" mentor figure. Going down that road would have made a lot of the back end of the series feel less tacked on, but again, probably would have undercut some of the fun recreation and mystery aspects that made the earlier episodes so successful.
|
|
|
Post by The Stuffingtacular She-Hulk on Mar 10, 2021 11:50:06 GMT -5
I was also bothered by the "well, she feels pretty darned bad about what happened, so we'll just let her wander off into the sunset" ending. I think that also represented kind of a botched landing on their Monica Rambeau origin story b-plot. I suppose one should be grateful that they didn't just go with a full on 'magic sets everything back like this never happened' ending. See, I didn't get a "well, everything is resolved now because Wanda feels bad about it" vibe. I saw it more as "she's already been messing with our heads for a few weeks on a 24/7 basis, she's absolutely terrifying, and we literally cannot do a single thing to make her stop or hold her accountable right now because she's so incredibly powerful, so it's better that she just gets the fuck out of our town and our lives." They're clearly still very scared of her and what else she might do - and rightfully so. Considering how the MCU works, I would be very surprised if Dr. Strange 2 didn't explore the consequences from this in some way.
I generally agree with Prole's assessment, though! And I'd like to add that the show managed to make Darcy Lewis likeable in about 20 minutes total of screen time, something two Thor movies couldn't accomplish for shit.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Mar 10, 2021 12:13:48 GMT -5
I was also bothered by the "well, she feels pretty darned bad about what happened, so we'll just let her wander off into the sunset" ending. I think that also represented kind of a botched landing on their Monica Rambeau origin story b-plot. I suppose one should be grateful that they didn't just go with a full on 'magic sets everything back like this never happened' ending. See, I didn't get a "well, everything is resolved now because Wanda feels bad about it" vibe. I saw it more as "she's already been messing with our heads for a few weeks on a 24/7 basis, she's absolutely terrifying, and we literally cannot do a single thing to make her stop or hold her accountable right now because she's so incredibly powerful, so it's better that she just gets the fuck out of our town and our lives." They're clearly still very scared of her and what else she might do - and rightfully so. Considering how the MCU works, I would be very surprised if Dr. Strange 2 didn't explore the consequences from this in some way.
I generally agree with Prole's assessment, though! And I'd like to add that the show managed to make Darcy Lewis likeable in about 20 minutes total of screen time, something two Thor movies couldn't accomplish for shit.
This is where I think the show's treatment of Director Hayward was just absolutely wrongheaded on so many levels. Rather than making him a cartoon Snidely Whiplash villain who shoots at kids, they had the opportunity to create an ongoing antagonist on the level of "Thunderbolt" Ross who remains a thorn in Wanda's (and Vision's) side largely because his concerns are valid. Those missed opportunities are where the finale of WandaVision frustrates me. An ambiguous Agatha could have been the next Loki, rather than left in the hands of townsfolk (who probably won't be terribly accepting of her). An ambiguous or smarter Hayward could have been a credible and morally defensible antagonist going forward. A proper reveal of the demonic familiar of Scratchy the rabbit could have opened the doors for more demonic activity in the MCU. And of course, Evan Peters. Making Wanda's returned, recast brother into a meaningless boner joke just seems like a deliberate fuck you to every Marvel fan that was speculating about what such an important meta-event could possibly mean for the wider universe. Releasing the series on a weekly basis was a deliberate choice that they had to know was going to create exactly the kind of theories and speculation that it did, and they decided to resolve it in the dullest, least interesting way it was humanly possible to do while still actually providing an answer. Why couldn't they have used this as their way of introducing the Fox mutants into the MCU? Would that have been so terrible?
|
|
|
Post by Superb Owl 🦉 on Mar 10, 2021 12:17:51 GMT -5
I was also bothered by the "well, she feels pretty darned bad about what happened, so we'll just let her wander off into the sunset" ending. I think that also represented kind of a botched landing on their Monica Rambeau origin story b-plot. I suppose one should be grateful that they didn't just go with a full on 'magic sets everything back like this never happened' ending. See, I didn't get a "well, everything is resolved now because Wanda feels bad about it" vibe. I saw it more as "she's already been messing with our heads for a few weeks on a 24/7 basis, she's absolutely terrifying, and we literally cannot do a single thing to make her stop or hold her accountable right now because she's so incredibly powerful, so it's better that she just gets the fuck out of our town and our lives." They're clearly still very scared of her and what else she might do - and rightfully so. Considering how the MCU works, I would be very surprised if Dr. Strange 2 didn't explore the consequences from this in some way.
I generally agree with Prole's assessment, though! And I'd like to add that the show managed to make Darcy Lewis likeable in about 20 minutes total of screen time, something two Thor movies couldn't accomplish for shit.
No you're right, that was how they presented it and this will probably continue to play out in Dr. Strange 2. This was a case where the MCU's larger structure led to a less satisfying end to this chapter (imo). It was justified in-universe that they let her walk away because they really had no way to make her do anything. I guess, I personally would have liked to sit with the awfulness and distrust a little bit more.
|
|
|
Post by Superb Owl 🦉 on Mar 10, 2021 12:27:50 GMT -5
See, I didn't get a "well, everything is resolved now because Wanda feels bad about it" vibe. I saw it more as "she's already been messing with our heads for a few weeks on a 24/7 basis, she's absolutely terrifying, and we literally cannot do a single thing to make her stop or hold her accountable right now because she's so incredibly powerful, so it's better that she just gets the fuck out of our town and our lives." They're clearly still very scared of her and what else she might do - and rightfully so. Considering how the MCU works, I would be very surprised if Dr. Strange 2 didn't explore the consequences from this in some way.
I generally agree with Prole's assessment, though! And I'd like to add that the show managed to make Darcy Lewis likeable in about 20 minutes total of screen time, something two Thor movies couldn't accomplish for shit.
This is where I think the show's treatment of Director Hayward was just absolutely wrongheaded on so many levels. Rather than making him a cartoon Snidely Whiplash villain who shoots at kids, they had the opportunity to create an ongoing antagonist on the level of "Thunderbolt" Ross who remains a thorn in Wanda's (and Vision's) side largely because his concerns are valid. Those missed opportunities are where the finale of WandaVision frustrates me. An ambiguous Agatha could have been the next Loki, rather than left in the hands of townsfolk (who probably won't be terribly accepting of her). An ambiguous or smarter Hayward could have been a credible and morally defensible antagonist going forward. A proper reveal of the demonic familiar of Scratchy the rabbit could have opened the doors for more demonic activity in the MCU. And of course, Evan Peters. Making Wanda's returned, recast brother into a meaningless boner joke just seems like a deliberate fuck you to every Marvel fan that was speculating about what such an important meta-event could possibly mean for the wider universe. Releasing the series on a weekly basis was a deliberate choice that they had to know was going to create exactly the kind of theories and speculation that it did, and they decided to resolve it in the dullest, least interesting way it was humanly possible to do while still actually providing an answer. Why couldn't they have used this as their way of introducing the Fox mutants into the MCU? Would that have been so terrible? I'll disagree with you on Peters because I absolutely loved that it was a deliberate fuck you to the speculative hype industrial complex. I'm sure it was divisive and taken as a deeply personal wrong done unto some segment of their fanbase but, you know, sometimes it's good to be reminded to just enjoy the (VERY GOOD) thing you're currently watching instead of worrying about what it means for the next 5 movies. You're right on with Hayward though, who becomes such an inexplicably oblivious dick over the course of the show that he stops being interesting. The biggest fuck up on that front is how they reveal him handling Wanda's attempt to retrieve Vision's body. Really, we're supposed to take seriously this yutz who doesn't even have the sense to say "hey guys, why don't you take a coffee break, probably not a good look if we're actively sawing into the head when she comes back here"?
|
|
|
Post by The Stuffingtacular She-Hulk on Mar 10, 2021 12:47:36 GMT -5
This is where I think the show's treatment of Director Hayward was just absolutely wrongheaded on so many levels. Rather than making him a cartoon Snidely Whiplash villain who shoots at kids, they had the opportunity to create an ongoing antagonist on the level of "Thunderbolt" Ross who remains a thorn in Wanda's (and Vision's) side largely because his concerns are valid. Those missed opportunities are where the finale of WandaVision frustrates me. An ambiguous Agatha could have been the next Loki, rather than left in the hands of townsfolk (who probably won't be terribly accepting of her). An ambiguous or smarter Hayward could have been a credible and morally defensible antagonist going forward. A proper reveal of the demonic familiar of Scratchy the rabbit could have opened the doors for more demonic activity in the MCU. And of course, Evan Peters. Making Wanda's returned, recast brother into a meaningless boner joke just seems like a deliberate fuck you to every Marvel fan that was speculating about what such an important meta-event could possibly mean for the wider universe. Releasing the series on a weekly basis was a deliberate choice that they had to know was going to create exactly the kind of theories and speculation that it did, and they decided to resolve it in the dullest, least interesting way it was humanly possible to do while still actually providing an answer. Why couldn't they have used this as their way of introducing the Fox mutants into the MCU? Would that have been so terrible? I'll disagree with you on Peters because I absolutely loved that it was a deliberate fuck you to the speculative hype industrial complex. I'm sure it was divisive and taken as a deeply personal wrong done unto some segment of their fanbase but, you know, sometimes it's good to be reminded to just enjoy the (VERY GOOD) thing you're currently watching instead of worrying about what it means for the next 5 movies. You're right on with Hayward though, who becomes such an inexplicably oblivious dick over the course of the show that he stops being interesting. The biggest fuck up on that front is how they reveal him handling Wanda's attempt to retrieve Vision's body. Really, we're supposed to take seriously this yutz who doesn't even have the sense to say "hey guys, why don't you take a coffee break, probably not a good look if we're actively sawing into the head when she comes back here"? Yeah, once I realized it was never going to be the actual introduction of the X-Men into the MCU, I thought Evan Peters' casting was totally hilarious. (The boner joke was dumb, but I still laughed at it anyway, because I'm secretly a 12-year-old boy.) They were never going to do that in a television show, as truly amazing as that would have been. Marvel is going to save that to announce as a movie at SDCC or D23, because the hype will generate months, if not years, of speculative discussions.
I agree with you both on Hayward. What a misfire of a character and a waste of a very good actor. Blergh!
I think Agatha's fate is actually quite a bit more ambiguous than many people seem to believe. I saw it as them setting it up for Wanda, Dr. Strange, and/or someone else to easily be able to access her powers whenever they need to. And this way, they know exactly where she is at all times. As for the townsfolk of Westview - I could be misremembering, but didn't they witness her telling Wanda to free everyone and let them go from her mental prison? They might well not have the same view of Agatha that we, the audience, do. Hell, for all we know, they might even be favorably disposed toward her for trying to help them, even though that was absolutely not what the viewers know happened.
|
|
|
Post by Superb Owl 🦉 on Mar 10, 2021 12:52:07 GMT -5
I'll disagree with you on Peters because I absolutely loved that it was a deliberate fuck you to the speculative hype industrial complex. I'm sure it was divisive and taken as a deeply personal wrong done unto some segment of their fanbase but, you know, sometimes it's good to be reminded to just enjoy the (VERY GOOD) thing you're currently watching instead of worrying about what it means for the next 5 movies. You're right on with Hayward though, who becomes such an inexplicably oblivious dick over the course of the show that he stops being interesting. The biggest fuck up on that front is how they reveal him handling Wanda's attempt to retrieve Vision's body. Really, we're supposed to take seriously this yutz who doesn't even have the sense to say "hey guys, why don't you take a coffee break, probably not a good look if we're actively sawing into the head when she comes back here"? Yeah, once I realized it was never going to be the actual introduction of the X-Men into the MCU, I thought Evan Peters' casting was totally hilarious. (The boner joke was dumb, but I still laughed at it anyway, because I'm secretly a 12-year-old boy.) They were never going to do that in a television show, as truly amazing as that would have been. Marvel is going to save that to announce as a movie at SDCC or D23, because the hype will generate months, if not years, of speculative discussions.
I agree with you both on Hayward. What a misfire of a character and a waste of a very good actor. Blergh!
I think Agatha's fate is actually quite a bit more ambiguous than many people seem to believe. I saw it as them setting it up for Wanda, Dr. Strange, and/or someone else to easily be able to access her powers whenever they need to. And this way, they know exactly where she is at all times. As for the townsfolk of Westview - I could be misremembering, but didn't they witness her telling Wanda to free everyone and let them go from her mental prison? They might well not have the same view of Agatha that we, the audience, do. Hell, for all we know, they might even be favorably disposed toward her for trying to help them, even though that was absolutely not what the viewers know happened.
Yea, it seemed pretty clear (especially again if you factor in the comic book character) that they were tucking Agatha away to at least leave themselves the possibility of revisiting her as a kind of anti-hero, mentor figure to Wanda. Which, if you've got a Kathryn Hahn in hand is a very smart thing to do!
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Mar 10, 2021 13:08:51 GMT -5
Yeah, once I realized it was never going to be the actual introduction of the X-Men into the MCU, I thought Evan Peters' casting was totally hilarious. (The boner joke was dumb, but I still laughed at it anyway, because I'm secretly a 12-year-old boy.) They were never going to do that in a television show, as truly amazing as that would have been. Marvel is going to save that to announce as a movie at SDCC or D23, because the hype will generate months, if not years, of speculative discussions.
I agree with you both on Hayward. What a misfire of a character and a waste of a very good actor. Blergh!
I think Agatha's fate is actually quite a bit more ambiguous than many people seem to believe. I saw it as them setting it up for Wanda, Dr. Strange, and/or someone else to easily be able to access her powers whenever they need to. And this way, they know exactly where she is at all times. As for the townsfolk of Westview - I could be misremembering, but didn't they witness her telling Wanda to free everyone and let them go from her mental prison? They might well not have the same view of Agatha that we, the audience, do. Hell, for all we know, they might even be favorably disposed toward her for trying to help them, even though that was absolutely not what the viewers know happened.
Yea, it seemed pretty clear (especially again if you factor in the comic book character) that they were tucking Agatha away to at least leave themselves the possibility of revisiting her as a kind of anti-hero, mentor figure to Wanda. Which, if you've got a Kathryn Hahn in hand is a very smart thing to do! I didn't really mention Kathryn Hahn but I do want to make it clear I think that she was terrific as Agatha (and Agnes) and you can just tell how much relish she has for the role. I still don't at all believe the character belongs in WandaVision but that's not her fault - she plays the role she was given and plays it excellently.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Jun 13, 2021 11:23:52 GMT -5
What's The Show? The Equalizer.
What's It All About, Proley? Well, back in the dim and distant days of the 80's, when bubble perms were acceptable and day-glo was somehow alright to wear for a night on the town, Edward Woodward defended the lost and in-trouble of New York City who had no-one else to turn to. It was all exceedingly 80's, with a moody synth theme tune, grubby locations and ice-cool Robert McCall as played deadpan-straight by Woodward. Then, in the dim and distant days of *checks date*, erm 2014, the series became a movie, starring ice-cool Denzel Washington as Robert McCall - in other words it was exactly the same. But wait! Now, in the dim but extremely present day of 2021, we have a third go-around, this time starring Queen Latifah, as ice... no wait, that's not it. She's exceedingly cool but the ice has gone this time out, instead playing Robyn McCall (no relation) as someone who's driven to help people but is also balancing a family life at the same time. It is, in other words, every bit as 2021 as the original series was 80's.
Why Did You Give It A Go? (Very) faint lingering appreciation of the original, which I probably haven't seen since its original broadcast. But, mostly, for Queen Latifah.
Is It Any Good? It's very much it's own thing, but the thing it's very much its own of (if that makes sense) is refreshingly enjoyable. This is comfort TV - something to watch when you're eating dinner or doing the ironing. It's genre TV in the best sense, and though the plots - which are mostly standalone despite a running thread of Robyn's past life being dragged into the present via Chris Noth's William Bishop, an ex-CIA boss - are pretty rote as far as TV thriller shows go there's... well, there's something about it that just works. It's a long way from prestige TV but that's also why it works - it's not trying to be something it isn't and understands how to make what it is work well. It helps that the cast are insanely charismatic - with Queen Latifah naturally at the top of the pile. She's fantastic as Robyn, endlessly watchable and kick-ass in all the right ways, but she's not the only one. Lorraine Toussaint very nearly steals the show as Aunt Vi, a lovely, naturalistic performance that really helps to give dimension to the home-life material which might otherwise border on cliche. Tony Kittles, as Detective Dante, whose uneasy alliance with McCall powers much of the drama of the show, is definitely channeling his inner Denzel but he's also good enough to pull that off - certainly magnetic enough to hold attention, and he's got real spark with Latifah. It's just enjoyable watching such a gifted cast chew their way through this material.
How Many Of These Did You Watch? All of the first season, which is only ten episodes, and since it's been renewed for a second season I'll be watching them too.
Would You Recommend It? Yes, with the caveat that this is pulpy, genre TV so, you know, don't go in expecting Mr Robot or something. Yet it is thoroughly entertaining, and it's got a high enough budget that it's slick enough to pull off big car chases or fight scenes every episode without it seeming ridiculous (or at the very least, the right kind of ridiculous). Queen Latifah helps a lot here - she's simply marvellous when sliding about the place on her motorbike - but it's a solid production all round. The only bit which rings slightly untrue is the whole "Bat-cave" underground geek hideout, whereby Robyn has a couple of handy nerds on tap to do all the very-nearly-sci-fi surveillance stuff. And again this is saved by a couple of rather charming performances (from Adam Goldberg and Liza Lapira, not given a whole lot of material beyond point-at-things-and-explain) so it just kinda comes off. So if you're in the mood for a bit of a TV action thriller that you don't need to overly invest in the, sure, I'd recommend it. You could do a lot worse. In fact the only thing wrong is the absence of that Tangerine Dream theme from the original and really, that's not too bad at all.
Scores On The Doors? 7/10 It is what it is.
|
|
|
Post by haysoos on Jun 16, 2021 9:57:20 GMT -5
What's The Show? The Equalizer.What's It All About, Proley? Well, back in the dim and distant days of the 80's, when bubble perms were acceptable and day-glo was somehow alright to wear for a night on the town, Edward Woodward defended the lost and in-trouble of New York City who had no-one else to turn to. It was all exceedingly 80's, with a moody synth theme tune, grubby locations and ice-cool Robert McCall as played deadpan-straight by Woodward. Then, in the dim and distant days of *checks date*, erm 2014, the series became a movie, starring ice-cool Denzel Washington as Robert McCall - in other words it was exactly the same. But wait! Now, in the dim but extremely present day of 2021, we have a third go-around, this time starring Queen Latifah, as ice... no wait, that's not it. She's exceedingly cool but the ice has gone this time out, instead playing Robyn McCall (no relation) as someone who's driven to help people but is also balancing a family life at the same time. It is, in other words, every bit as 2021 as the original series was 80's. Why Did You Give It A Go? (Very) faint lingering appreciation of the original, which I probably haven't seen since its original broadcast. But, mostly, for Queen Latifah. Is It Any Good? It's very much it's own thing, but the thing it's very much its own of (if that makes sense) is refreshingly enjoyable. This is comfort TV - something to watch when you're eating dinner or doing the ironing. It's genre TV in the best sense, and though the plots - which are mostly standalone despite a running thread of Robyn's past life being dragged into the present via Chris Noth's William Bishop, an ex-CIA boss - are pretty rote as far as TV thriller shows go there's... well, there's something about it that just works. It's a long way from prestige TV but that's also why it works - it's not trying to be something it isn't and understands how to make what it is work well. It helps that the cast are insanely charismatic - with Queen Latifah naturally at the top of the pile. She's fantastic as Robyn, endlessly watchable and kick-ass in all the right ways, but she's not the only one. Lorraine Toussaint very nearly steals the show as Aunt Vi, a lovely, naturalistic performance that really helps to give dimension to the home-life material which might otherwise border on cliche. Tony Kittles, as Detective Dante, whose uneasy alliance with McCall powers much of the drama of the show, is definitely channeling his inner Denzel but he's also good enough to pull that off - certainly magnetic enough to hold attention, and he's got real spark with Latifah. It's just enjoyable watching such a gifted cast chew their way through this material. How Many Of These Did You Watch? All of the first season, which is only ten episodes, and since it's been renewed for a second season I'll be watching them too. Would You Recommend It? Yes, with the caveat that this is pulpy, genre TV so, you know, don't go in expecting Mr Robot or something. Yet it is thoroughly entertaining, and it's got a high enough budget that it's slick enough to pull off big car chases or fight scenes every episode without it seeming ridiculous (or at the very least, the right kind of ridiculous). Queen Latifah helps a lot here - she's simply marvellous when sliding about the place on her motorbike - but it's a solid production all round. The only bit which rings slightly untrue is the whole "Bat-cave" underground geek hideout, whereby Robyn has a couple of handy nerds on tap to do all the very-nearly-sci-fi surveillance stuff. And again this is saved by a couple of rather charming performances (from Adam Goldberg and Liza Lapira, not given a whole lot of material beyond point-at-things-and-explain) so it just kinda comes off. So if you're in the mood for a bit of a TV action thriller that you don't need to overly invest in the, sure, I'd recommend it. You could do a lot worse. In fact the only thing wrong is the absence of that Tangerine Dream theme from the original and really, that's not too bad at all. Scores On The Doors? 7/10 It is what it is. As a point of order, the original Equalizer theme was by Stewart Copeland, best known as the drummer for the Police. He also did the soundtrack for the movie Rumble Fish (among many others), and one of my favourite albums of the 80s The Rythmatist, which broke the wave of World Fusion music a year before Graceland came out. I've been meaning to check out the new version of The Equalizer, as my main problem with the Denzel version is they make him too Jason Bourne and all action beat-em-up solve everything with fists, and I'm hoping that with Queen Latifah they get back to the Ed Woodward version of using smarty-smarts more than punchy-punch to defeat the bad guys. There is a distinct lack of smarty-smart heroes these days. Even The Doctor seems to rely more on "Google me, I'm a badass", or "Screenwriter ex machina" than actually figuring out how to resolve a situation.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Jun 16, 2021 10:37:16 GMT -5
What's The Show? The Equalizer.What's It All About, Proley? Well, back in the dim and distant days of the 80's, when bubble perms were acceptable and day-glo was somehow alright to wear for a night on the town, Edward Woodward defended the lost and in-trouble of New York City who had no-one else to turn to. It was all exceedingly 80's, with a moody synth theme tune, grubby locations and ice-cool Robert McCall as played deadpan-straight by Woodward. Then, in the dim and distant days of *checks date*, erm 2014, the series became a movie, starring ice-cool Denzel Washington as Robert McCall - in other words it was exactly the same. But wait! Now, in the dim but extremely present day of 2021, we have a third go-around, this time starring Queen Latifah, as ice... no wait, that's not it. She's exceedingly cool but the ice has gone this time out, instead playing Robyn McCall (no relation) as someone who's driven to help people but is also balancing a family life at the same time. It is, in other words, every bit as 2021 as the original series was 80's. Why Did You Give It A Go? (Very) faint lingering appreciation of the original, which I probably haven't seen since its original broadcast. But, mostly, for Queen Latifah. Is It Any Good? It's very much it's own thing, but the thing it's very much its own of (if that makes sense) is refreshingly enjoyable. This is comfort TV - something to watch when you're eating dinner or doing the ironing. It's genre TV in the best sense, and though the plots - which are mostly standalone despite a running thread of Robyn's past life being dragged into the present via Chris Noth's William Bishop, an ex-CIA boss - are pretty rote as far as TV thriller shows go there's... well, there's something about it that just works. It's a long way from prestige TV but that's also why it works - it's not trying to be something it isn't and understands how to make what it is work well. It helps that the cast are insanely charismatic - with Queen Latifah naturally at the top of the pile. She's fantastic as Robyn, endlessly watchable and kick-ass in all the right ways, but she's not the only one. Lorraine Toussaint very nearly steals the show as Aunt Vi, a lovely, naturalistic performance that really helps to give dimension to the home-life material which might otherwise border on cliche. Tony Kittles, as Detective Dante, whose uneasy alliance with McCall powers much of the drama of the show, is definitely channeling his inner Denzel but he's also good enough to pull that off - certainly magnetic enough to hold attention, and he's got real spark with Latifah. It's just enjoyable watching such a gifted cast chew their way through this material. How Many Of These Did You Watch? All of the first season, which is only ten episodes, and since it's been renewed for a second season I'll be watching them too. Would You Recommend It? Yes, with the caveat that this is pulpy, genre TV so, you know, don't go in expecting Mr Robot or something. Yet it is thoroughly entertaining, and it's got a high enough budget that it's slick enough to pull off big car chases or fight scenes every episode without it seeming ridiculous (or at the very least, the right kind of ridiculous). Queen Latifah helps a lot here - she's simply marvellous when sliding about the place on her motorbike - but it's a solid production all round. The only bit which rings slightly untrue is the whole "Bat-cave" underground geek hideout, whereby Robyn has a couple of handy nerds on tap to do all the very-nearly-sci-fi surveillance stuff. And again this is saved by a couple of rather charming performances (from Adam Goldberg and Liza Lapira, not given a whole lot of material beyond point-at-things-and-explain) so it just kinda comes off. So if you're in the mood for a bit of a TV action thriller that you don't need to overly invest in the, sure, I'd recommend it. You could do a lot worse. In fact the only thing wrong is the absence of that Tangerine Dream theme from the original and really, that's not too bad at all. Scores On The Doors? 7/10 It is what it is. As a point of order, the original Equalizer theme was by Stewart Copeland, best known as the drummer for the Police. He also did the soundtrack for the movie Rumble Fish (among many others), and one of my favourite albums of the 80s The Rythmatist, which broke the wave of World Fusion music a year before Graceland came out. I've been meaning to check out the new version of The Equalizer, as my main problem with the Denzel version is they make him too Jason Bourne and all action beat-em-up solve everything with fists, and I'm hoping that with Queen Latifah they get back to the Ed Woodward version of using smarty-smarts more than punchy-punch to defeat the bad guys. There is a distinct lack of smarty-smart heroes these days. Even The Doctor seems to rely more on "Google me, I'm a badass", or "Screenwriter ex machina" than actually figuring out how to resolve a situation. You are right and I am an idiot - it was Street Hawk Tangerine Dream did the theme song for, not The Equalizer. D'oh!
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Jul 17, 2021 10:54:39 GMT -5
What’s The Show? Loki
What’s It All About, Proley? After (well, during) the events of Endgame, the trickster God Loki manages to escape with the Tesseract and finds himself in an alternate timeline. There he is taken in by the Time Variance Agency, an organisation that exists outside of normal space and time who help to regulate the “one sacred timeline” by ensuring one version of history is always running as it is “meant to”. Since this version of Loki is a time variant, everyone’s favourite troublemaker has a choice – either face being pruned form existence as a variant or assist in fixing the timeline in order to prevent an even bigger threat. That means we get six episodes of various differing amounts of stuff, during which we learn that the TVA is a bit of a fraud, the Time-Keepers who are meant to run the place entirely fictional, and the whole thing ends with the reveal of He Who Remains, the real power behind the throne and gratuitous set-up for the upcoming slate of Main Range movies. Oh, and the inevitable post-credits thing which makes it clear Loki’s getting a second season.
Why Did You Give It A Go? Well so far the MCU/Disney shows have been fairly consistent, which is to say there’s a definite (and fairly high) baseline quality but both WandaVision and The Falcon And The Winter Soldier have also exhibited some of the same mistakes – namely, stuffing the landing. So – apart from Tom Hiddleston, who fun to watch in anything – it would be nice to see if third time’s a charm.
Is It Any Good? It’s got the same pacing issues that dogged the two previous shows, and that’s very frustrating because there’s a lot of good stuff here that the show can’t quite find a way to pull into focus and get to work. The good stuff is pretty good though. For one, of course, Hiddleston is great and his Loki is always worth watching. Owen Wilson, cast here as Mobius, a sort of bureaucrat-cum-time-detective, is also an appealingly laconic turn and a refreshingly unusual character in the MCU in that he doesn’t play everything dialled up to 11 for MAXIMUM IMPACT (there’s a lot of that in Loki). In fact most of the cast are strong, though Sophia Di Martino as Loki-variant Sylvie is a little… not ineffective, exactly, but the character doesn’t quite land in the way it’s meant to. She’s not helped by slightly lopsided writing that seems to assume we’ll care about simply because she’s a Loki variant and so therefore doesn’t do a lot to build her up as a character, and Di Martino isn’t quite good enough to bridge that gap. And the weird will-they-won’t-they thing with “our” Loki is just a really peculiar choice that doesn't work.
Loki, too, is weirdly not that much of a focus in his own show. Part of the problem is that Loki has to do a lot of heavy lifting in terms of getting things ready for the upcoming movies which means great big chunks of the show are little more than exposition – indeed, the last episode is basically Exposition: The Television Show, largely saved by Jonathan Major’s excellent turn as He Who Remains, another nicely unusual presence. But Loki isn't an ideal character to have people stand around and explain stuff at him - he's meant to be the trickster God who always tries to be one step ahead and who always has another trick up his sleeve, and using him to have exposition dumps directed at him undermines the character (in that respect, Thor would actually be a better character to do this with, since his obliviousness often lends itself to having things explained at him). Which means that a show with Loki is as often about moving plot parts as it is about him. Or it’s about Sylvie. Or it’s about (briefly) Gugu Mbatha-Raw’s hunter-turned-judge Ravonna Renslayer, who looks after the Loki variant investigations. And so on. We’ve been sold a show which is – to take an inevitable comparison – as if Doctor Who was about the Master rather than the Doctor, and that's pretty much what Episode One is. But that premise doesn't last and we get five other episodes which largely just consist of "other stuff" - usually quite fun but ultimately rather fragmentary, and rarely about “our” Loki at all.
How Many Episodes Did You Watch? All six. It’s not exactly an arduous task.
Would You Recommend It? It’s probably the best of the MCU/Disney shows, despite those flaws from the first two shows being replicated here. It’s certainly more engaging than The Falcon And The Winter Soldier which never quite found a way to land its action-adventure aesthetic along with its politics in a successful manner. And fun though WandaVision was for much of its run that ending really did damage to the show. In fact, saying this was the best MCU TV finale – which it definitely is – it is very much damning with faint praise. It was better than WandaVision's bog-standard MCU ending and The Falcon And The Winter Soldier’s foregone conclusion (and slightly uncomfortable flag-waving), but it’ still a struggle to invest in all that much because it’s just one explanation after another after another after another… It was also weirdly directed in places - Mobius's "who are you?" right at the end ought to have been the huge dramatic cliff-hanger - if we're sticking with Doctor Who as an analogy, this is where the big sting would be and the theme crashes in as suddenly the rug is pulled out from under our feet! Gasp, Mobius doesn’t know who Loki is! But all Loki does is pull the rug out from under our feet, every episode, so it's a bit "and...?"
it’s just oddly underplayed and the emphasis feels off, and that's kind of Loki's problem in a nutshell. It's really exciting to have a show where anything can happen and things swap up episode by episode, but you need a really strong tonal through-line to anchor that and "hey, maybe Loki will snog Loki!" isn't it, and Sylvie isn't that interesting of a character anyway. Legends Of Tomorrow – with which Loki shares a considerable amount of DNA – can just about pull off that kind of switch-up, but it also has seasons with an episode count that runs into the mid-teens, so there’s a lot more space to gain that consistency. This show only has half a dozen episodes and just can't pick a side, so we get six episodes of various different scenarios that swap up episode by episode which are largely entertaining but the effect of which renders a lot of the material as largely inconsequential stuff, even when we're discussing multiverse wars and whatnot. It's all so terribly abstract.
Which also leads us to the usual MCU problem of jeopardy inflation. We threatened the whole universe with Thanos, now hark as we threaten the multiverse with He Who Remains! Yes, but but but... maybe give us a reason to care? The stakes aren't meaningfully changed, they're just bigger numbers and because the final episode is mostly standing-about-expositing (again - entertainingly, but still) He Who Remains might as well have been reading a fairy-tale for all the emotional impact this has, and muttered warnings about branching timelines just doesn't cut the mustard. Obviously we know the upcoming Main Range movies will cover some of this - not the stakes thing, MCU movies are not particularly great at tying Big Gods Fight to Why We Care - but that's not really an excuse for this show, and as a result a lot of the good work done here gets rather lost. And there is plenty of good stuff here, let’s be clear. It just aches for decent organisation and an actual focus on the lead character who is, after all, why we’ve all tuned to watch.
Scores On The Doors? Well, I would have given The Falcon And The Winter Soldier 6/10 and I gave WandaVision 7/10 so this gets a half mark more, because it’s better, so 7.5/10
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Dec 26, 2021 7:41:24 GMT -5
What’s The Show? Dr Brain
What’s It All About, Proley? Lee Sun-kyun stars as Dr Koh Se-won, the titular brain doctor, a brilliant scientist who had discovered a way to “brain synch” his mind with the recently deceased. This allows him to explore their memories for clues to what happened to them when they died. His family are killed in a mysterious accident, so it’s down to the good Doctor to figure out what’s going on, and also to try and keep his grip on reality as it becomes increasingly difficult for him to distinguish reality from the experiences he’s had in other people’s minds. In the end it turns out his son has been abducted by his terminally ill and wheelchair-bound father, who believe he can transfer his brain into the young boy and thus become, essentially, immortal. Like you do. Can Se-won stop his deranged father and rescue his son?
Why Did You Give It A Go? A couple of reasons, really. It’s an Apple TV show and while Apple TV shows aren’t necessarily always to my taste, I do admire the fact that they’re sometimes prepared to really swing for the fences – I wish I liked For All Mankind rather than find it plodding and dull, but I admire the fact they kept going with it and it’s clearly found an audience, even if I am not among their number. So Apple TV’s first Korean-language show seemed like it at least had the potential to be interesting. Plus, there’s a glut of Korean talent involved here, from Kim Jee-woon (The Good, The Bad, The Weird) in the directors chair, to Lee Sun-kyun of Parasite fame. Plenty of reasons, in other words!
Is It Any Good? It really is! Flawless isn’t an adjective that’s going to get bandied about here, but for a six-episode series with a lot of ground to cover this is basically a pretty great show. There’s a lot of genre collisions going on here – sci-fi with the brain synch concept, police and detectives shows with the ongoing investigations into Se-won’s family, medical drama of course, there’s some buddy-cop stuff going on, a whole host of hallucinatory imagery and, in the last episode, what amounts to a James Bond riff as the Big Secret Lair is discovered and there’s a rush to save Se-won’s son. The script flips its way through all these different genres with aplomb, drawing on whichever one is going to help propel the plot forwards as and when it’s needed.
There’s not a lot of attention paid to the mechanics of the brain synchs and transfers – the right choice – but its key role in the story is established early on, and even used for some excellent comedy, as Se-won synchs up with a recently deceased cat (!) to try and get clues to a crime, complete with roving carpet-level cat-cam. It’s very funny, it’s serious and also oddly poignant, which is quite the mix. As the story progresses other aspects come into play, and a winning performance from Lee Jae-won as sidekick and colleague Dr Hong Nam-il helps keep things grounded – it’s a stand-out performance among a terrific cast which also includes Tunnel‘s Lee Yoo-young as Se-won’s wife in what is a rather under-written part but one in which she is characteristically fantastic. In all of this, the through-line of grief, loss and how to cope with them is never lost, but rarely becomes so ponderous as to drown out the other elements of the show. And if that balancing act isn’t always perfect, it’s done right way more times than it’s done wrong and doesn’t do any meaningful damage.
How Many Of These Did You Watch? All six episodes, which as you may have gathered by now are available on Apple TV, and this show’s release co-incided with the service being launched in Korea.
Would You Recommend It? Very much so. Six episodes isn’t exactly a burdensome undertaking, and there’s just so much to enjoy here. This is also a show that gradually gets better and better as it goes along, so while the early episodes are never bad – indeed they are solidly entertaining – by the time we get to the last two things have really ramped up. In particular, the final episode is an absolutely brilliant conclusion to the series, including the inter-generational fight within the mind of Se-won’s father as one battles to save his son, the other to take over his grandson. It’s a heady mix, yet the show pulls it off admirably, and even leaves us with a final-moment shock which works remarkably well.
And while you would be hard-pressed to call this a meaningful interrogation of anything specific, there are so many themes – ethics, neurodiverstiy, loss, grief, redemption, technology, fear – that it’s also a series that’s easy to read in a number of different ways and the multiplicity of thematic strands lends weight to it and makes it more than another piece of sci-fi fluff. If one were to criticise, the female characters tend to get pretty short shrift here, though another shout-out to Lee Yoo-young’s excellent turn – she’s able to do a lot with a little, and her eventual death manages to be genuinely moving in large part down to the strength of her performance. Saying that, though, there’s not a bad performance on display here and the show carries itself off with a remarkable amount of swagger and confidence. Having Kim Jee-woon behind the camera – as well as in the writer’s chair – helps to explain that of course, but as Apple TV’s first Korean-language production this is a bold and sure start (compare and contrast with Netflix’s first attempt, the rather unremarkable Love Alarm – Apple are certainly off to a better start than that). If the standard of Dr Brain – goofy title and all – can be maintained then there’s lots of potential for really great Korean drama to come, and I’m very much looking forward to it.
Oh and one other point, minor though it is – most Korean shows feature an abundance of product-placement when it come to electronic goods. This is almost always from Samsung, which makes sense. Being an Apple TV show, the sheer preponderance of Apple placed devices is both distracting and, eventually, really rather funny and stands out like a sore thumb. Doesn’t affect anything in particular, but it’s still worth noting in passing.
Scores On The Doors? 8/10
|
|