ABz Bš¹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,993
|
Post by ABz Bš¹anaz on Mar 26, 2021 22:04:15 GMT -5
Keaton really is fucking amazing in this. The menace when he (fairly easily) figures out that Peter is Spider-Man, and then at the end when he refuses to give up his identity in prison to the other inmates. Just FANTASTIC!
|
|
Crash Test Dumbass
AV Clubber
ffc what now
Posts: 7,058
Gender (additional): mostly snacks
|
Post by Crash Test Dumbass on Mar 27, 2021 7:35:58 GMT -5
This Peter has to be at a different high school than he was attending in Civil War, even if this is supposed to be just a couple months later. He was nailing ho-hum algebra tests before, now he's solving physics problems at a glance? Perhaps Stark got him transferred to a magnet program. Certainly this school is on some kind of island where said physics class is just part of the curriculum for 15 to 16-year-olds, though Peter may just be in advanced classes for his age. Anyway it's small enough that freshmen know and can even party with seniors like Liz (which was true in my little high school but I wasn't in New York). QUEENS is apparently the most racially diverse place on Earth irl and that seems to be reflected by the movie's student body, a notable change from the last two mostly-white high schools. The movie also re-defines what a bully can be: this Flash Thompson doesn't seem like a jock at all, just a rich kid competing with Peter intellectually. There's no obvious would-be physical threat from this Flash. Quick note from reality world: having gone to one of NYC's magnet schools and having hung out at another -- yeah, they have pretty small student bodies (for NYC (my graduating class was under 200)) and it's hard-to-impossible to transfer in past the first year, so there is a lot of inter-level intermingling, so well done on that, Marvel.
There is, however, a serious lack of diversity in modern NYC magnet schools, mostly due to inadequate funding for public schools in lower-income neighborhoods, same as everywhere else, so Marvel went for verisimilitude over the sad reality, so I'll give them points for that as well.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 27, 2021 8:39:45 GMT -5
The apartment I put down to what I call Enterprise Syndrome. In the OG Star Trek movies, the Enterprise bridge seemed to be different in every damned movie (between III and IV this is acceptable because its a different ship) right down to having a fluctuating number of turbolifts. Obviously this is because the set got an occasional refresh between outings but in-universe it clearly makes absolutely fuck all sense. Thus it is with the apartment - I assume it's meant to be the same one from Civil War, but eh, sets get redesigned and even the MCU can't keep track of everything. I too have rewatched the "Ned finds out" scene on more than one occasion, but mostly for reasons I can only describe as "prurient". I only make a point out of it because the Parker lifestyle became such an issue in some corners of the internet later on in Far From Home when Aunt May seems to have a new job and a bit more household income, the implication being that it came from secret or not-secret benefactor Stark. The further implication being that such economic boon would be a vile betrayal of the characters. Whatever your opinion of the latter, I think there is some intention to show that they are getting more income from somewhere Civil War on. "What gets you out of that twin bed in the morning?" and Ned dropping the Death Star from a bunk bed are both notable moments, it seems like more than a continuity goof.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 31, 2021 15:20:33 GMT -5
Nobody wants to get in a fightreasonable discussion about Tony Stark in Homecoming? Seems like that was all anyone was talking about in regards to this movie in my corners of the internet. As I predicted at the time, the trailer shot of them flying/swinging together was not actually in the movie.
I hadn't seen Far From Home since the theater, so I just watched it again in advance of Prole's review. One thing it reminds me about Homecoming is how out-of-his-element Spider-Man is here. He's not swinging from skyscrapers in he city, he's running through the suburbs and the national mall, or clinging to the side of a boat/airplane that's nowhere near a building. The only notable wall-crawling he does is on the Washington Monument, where the height makes him nervous!
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Mar 31, 2021 17:26:05 GMT -5
You know why I love Vulture in Homecoming? Small-scale goals. Way too many superhero movies go full apocalypse and have a villain who wants to End Reality or whatever and I never find that as compelling as villains like Vulture who just want to make some money and stick it to the Man.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on May 9, 2021 5:56:57 GMT -5
Update - I swear I haven't forgotten to finish this but I started a new job and have been snowed under. Combined with some home-life stuff I just haven't gotten round to watching Far From Home and Spider-Verse again, but hopefully I'll get FFH done within the next week or two.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on May 31, 2021 6:48:51 GMT -5
Into The Spider-Verse (2018) We take our first stab at animation with Into The Spider-Verse. But can the webslinger work in a feature-length animated movie? Pre-Existing Prejudices: It took me an absolute age to finally get my arse in gear and actually watch Into The Spider-Verse, then when I did I felt like an absolute fool ā an absolute fool ā for not having done it sooner, because I thought it was fucking great. Iāve seen it only once since the original viewing, so this makes it third time out for me. I own a T-shirt with the graffiti Spider-Logo on it, which should also give some idea of my appreciation. Whatās It All About, Proley?
Thanks to a rift in the dimensions caused by a super-collider built by Kingpin, various different versions of Spider-Man end up in āourā dimension, where original-flavour Peter Parker has been killed trying to defeat Kingpin and stop the collider. He passes a USB drive to Miles Morales, a teenager having a hard time living up to parental expectations, who promptly damages the drive. Thereās a different ā rather sadder ā Peter (B) Parker who arrives though the rift and helps guide Miles, freshly radioactive-spider-bitten, in all things Spidey while various other Spider-People ā Spider-Woman, A Different Spider Man, Spider -Ham, Spider-Man Noir, SP//dr: - also put in an appearance. Being in our dimension is damaging them all so they contrive a plan to return to their own reality and destroy the collider, while Doc Ock, working for Kingpin, tries to stop them. Eventually Kingpin is defeated, the collider destroyed, the Spider-People are sent back to their respective dimensions and Miles becomes Spider-Man. Any Other Business: ā¢ Itās pretty much impossible to talk about Into The Spider-Verse without mentioning the animation. Itās fucking amazing, in both 2D and (surprisingly) in 3D and pops with vibrancy and life all too rare in the world of computer-animated movies. ā¢ The other thing itās impossible not to mention is the casting, which is immaculate to the point that you may wonder if witchcraft was involved to get everything just so perfect. Shameik Moore is simply brilliant as Miles, and Jake Johnson turns in an excellent, schlubby Peter B Parker. Even fairly minor roles ā Lily Tomlin as Aunt May, Nicholas Cage (!) as Spider-Man Noir ā resonate in all sorts of wonderful ways. But best of all, really, is Kathryn Hahnās gender-flipped Doctor Octopus, a shrieking lunatic of a character and a sublimely over-the-top performance that knows just how far to go and no further. ā¢ The spider is radioactive! ā¢ The plot beat of Milesās uncle being a trusted mentor yet eventually turning out to be Prowler isnāt the most original in the world but damn if Mahershala Ali doesnāt make it work anyway. ā¢ Similarly Brian Tyree Henry as Milesās somewhat overbearing father turns in a really lovely, nuanced performance that gives the character scope to be so much more than a one-dimensional hard-ass parent. The scene with him admitting his fears outside Milesās dorm room has real emotional heft to it. ā¢ Incredibly sweetly, an excerpt of Cliff Roberson is used for Uncle Ben in a brief flashback. ā¢ Speaking of, weāre spared the whole ādead Uncle / great powerā routine and itās never not funny when the film takes the piss out of the very idea of a consistent origin story. But itās not just a joke, since it builds to the final scene when Miles is finally able to claim his origin story. Another amazing piece of work. ā¢ I love Aunt Mayās under-shed Spider Cave. āWhat kept you?ā indeed. ā¢ The āripplingā effect as the dimensions spill over and parts of New York distort into bright, primary-coloured shapes is also really well done, if fractionally overused. ā¢ Spider-Ham is a godsdamed delight. ā¢ While weāre generally past caring about Stan Lee cameos it would be a shame not to mention his one here, slightly expanded from his usual two-liners, as he sells Miles a Spider-Man costume. It was, of course, released posthumously. ā¢ āSuperheroes donāt usually wear their own merchā. Heh. ā¢ Kingpin, as played by Live Schreiber, is a joyous creation, a huge, hulking black presence looming over everything and with an extremely 30ās design which nicely fits into all the other stylistic mash-ups going on. And in line with everyone here, he has proper motivation ā he desperately wants to get his family back ā so heās never one-dimensional. Just fantastic. ā¢ The whole end-of movie fight between Miles and Kingpin, slipping through dimensions as trains writhe around them and landscapes slip in and out of phase is a glorious, magnificent and deeply psychedelic experience and goes beyond spectacular ā itās one of the best fight sequences in cinema, across any style or genre, animated or otherwise. It genuinely expands what movies, what animation, and what fight sequences can be, and as such is the capper to a note-perfect movie. ā¢ The imagine of Spider-Man Noir trying to understand a Rubikās Cube and failing (because heās black and white) is marvellous. Honestly, this is the best film Nicholas Cage has ever been in (not the most towering of bars, I realise). ā¢ And, in the end, Miles gets to step up, gets the traditional Spider-Man pose ā legs up, arms outstretched ā and itās genuinely emotional. In Conclusion: The spider is radioactive. Not āgeneticā. Not āenhancedā. Radioactive. Itās a small but incredibly significant detail, because itās about honesty and Into The Spider-Verse is all about honesty. Itās also about respect ā respecting where the character has actually come from rather than trying to shy away from it, and respect is another deeply woven theme throughout the movie. The detail of the spider being radioactive made sense back in the early days of Spider-Man because, well, it was the atomic age. But thatās the characterās origin story and by embracing this ā rather than the ever-so-slightly ashamed relationship the modern Spider-Man movies have with the radioactive-arachnid origins of the character ā Into The Spider-Verse reaches right back to the very core of the character. And it even manages to be funny, the bite that gives Miles his powers being comically underplayed as the spider falls rather pathetically to the ground after being brushed off. The whole origin is comedic, genuine, respectful, true to the character and just a great delivery. This is appropriate for a movie that wants to spend time exploring ā and lightly mocking ā the very idea of an origin story, and faced with numerous different Spider-People why wouldnāt you go back to the very first origin of the character? Itās the kind of smart, bold choice that Into The Spider-Verse makes time and time again. Because this film is perfect. Just, simply, perfect. Itās not merely the best Spider-Man movie, itās the best superhero movie. It may well be the best animated movie ever ā certainly from a Western perspective it probably is, with maybe only something like Studio Ghibli coming close elsewhere. Pixar havenāt produced a movie this good ā itās better than any of the Toy Story movies. Neither have Disney ā itās better than Fantasia and The Jungle Book and Snow White. Nobody has touched this. Slightly hyperbolic? Maybe, but it really is that good. Itās an amazing example of putting African-American characters at the heart of a superhero story and indeed is practically unique in how it centres itself that way in terms of cinematic superheroes (well, unless you want to count Catwomanā¦). Black Panther is an amazing film, no doubt, but itās also about a remote prince/king from a distant techno-utopia full of the worldās rarest metal who fights with a sci-fi suit of tight-fitting black armour. Into The Spider-Verse is just about a normal African-American teenager who becomes a superhero and centres the whole journey on Milesās experience as a regular black kid going to school. It doesnāt over-labour the race elements while at the same time still allowing them to inform the story. The tension between Miles and his father feels natural and well fleshed out, and the easy and casual friendship between Miles and his uncle has exactly the same feel to it ā itās genuine. Thereās real heart at the centre of Into The Spider-Verse and thatās why so much of it rings true. Even Milesās relationship ā if thatās the right word ā with Gwen, whereby his powers function as a stand-in for puberty, works where it really could have been rather cliched. Thatās partly because Miles is terribly charming, partly because Gwen is fantastic ā and the re-framing of their time together after Gwen is revealed as Spider-Gwen is excellent storytelling ā and partly because itās all done with such confidence. Itās a winning combination. And every time you see a decision made in Into The Spider-Verse you know you are seeing the right one being made. Every. Single. Time. Thereās genuinely nothing here that needs to be changed, altered or tweaked even slightly. The visuals are so good itās pretty hard not to just run out of adjectives describing them. It really does create the perfect comic-book experience, deeply invested in the actual aesthetics of comics down to captions and descriptions appearing as text on screen, and finding new ways of making that a compelling viewing experience. Itās relatively easy to visualise Milesās Spidey Sense as a few wavy lines round his head, itās rather harder to externalise his panic at not being able to detach from a web or pull himself off a wall heās stuck to, yet the movie manages this effortlessly. The aesthetics of the film inform how we see and relate to Miles, and Miles himself informs how those visuals develop as he does. Itās a frankly stunning execution and it really is hard to imagine that it could be done any better than it is here. And what of Doc Ock and Kingpin? Well, Kathryn Hahn makes a fair play to be the definitive Doctor Octopus, though it is, for obvious reasons, not all that easy to make a direct comparison to Alfred Molinaās equally amazing turn. Perhaps itās fairer to say that Hahn is the ideal animated Ock and Molina the ideal live action one. Doc Ock isnāt much invested in here ā sheās very much the secondary villain ā but sheās also exactly what the movie needs, and at exactly the right time. Her presence means we have an action villain while Kingpin can lurk out of sight, and she pounds about on her arms with real threat. The gender flipping works both because itās an unexpected twist and also because functionally makes no real difference ā the performance is great, the character remains true, so it all just clicks. Kingpin works similarly well, but in a more restrained, held-back sort of fashion. One of the great successes of Kingpin in this movie ā beyond the quite spectacular visualisation ā is that his deployment is actually relatively restrained. We get his introduction, where he takes out Peter Parker, and understand what a massive, almost existential, threat he is, but then Kingpin drops out of the story for large sections, only popping up to keep the rumbling threat of his presence in our minds, before that unimprovable final battle finally allows him to let rip again. Throughout it all, Kingpin is exactly the villain this movie needs. For all that Doctor Octopus is great fun ā because, of course ā having a still point in Kingpin at the centre of the maelstrom of everything else just gives him even more presence, and the lurking threat has all the more power for being implied as often as it is seen. Itās another adroit choice ā the correct path selected once again. And we havenāt even talked about all the other Spider-People yet! Genre mash-ups, crossover events and universe-breaking physics are, of course, nothing even remotely unusual in the comic book world, yet rarely if ever have they been done as successfully as is managed here. And part of why all the ridiculousness works is that thereās just enough self-awareness from the characters to understand the ludicrousness of the situation but not so much that everything becomes āmetaā and stifling. Because the other thing that makes Into The Spider-Verse so fantastic is just how funny the whole thing is, and with the other Spider-People we get to have that humour expressed in a completely new way. The visual styles ā anime for SP//dr:, black and white for Spider-Man Noir and so forth ā compliments the characters and allows for a whole new avenue of comedy to be opened up. Itās just funny when Noir is called out for always having his collar fluttering in a breeze that isnāt even there. Or when Spider-Hamās extreme kid-friendly cartoonishness means he can pull a mallet out of thin air as if he was in a Loony Tunes short. And yet itās not all just silly ā itās genuinely touching when Peni Parkerās SP//dr: suit and spider are destroyed during the final fight with Kingpin, partly because the anime style of the suit has allowed it to be expressive. Time and time again the visual stylings of the different Spider-People inform the story and action. Itās all just incredibly elegant, basically. So there we go. Into The Spider-Verse is perfect. And thatās it. Thereās really not that much more to say. Every element works. Every casting choice is perfect. Every visual is eye-popping. Itās got a phenomenal soundtrack. This movie literally could not be better. So thatās quite the challenge for Into The Spider-Verse 2 when it arrives, then. Script v Length: More Or Less?
In truth the script is precisely as long as it needs to be ā nothing is left out or missed in terms of the storytelling or exposition, the gentle mocking of the origin story is never anything other than funny, and the wrap-up works perfectly with time to say goodbye to all the alternative versions of the character and still have the chance to breathe and let Miles take centre stage. But Iām going to say āmoreā becauseā¦ well, I want more. I want so, so much more of this movie! The wait for Spider-Verse 2 (currently slated for October 2022 at time of writing) is going to be unbearably interminable. Give me more now, dammit! How Convincing Does This Webslinger Look?
Even if the script were nothing more than a lazy string of cliches (which it isnāt) and even if the characters were flat and unengaging (which theyāre not) and even if the whole thing was a massive bloated mess (which it isnāt), there has never been a movie more invested in making itself look like the act of reading a comic. The animation style used here for Miles and all the other various webslingers is stunning and Miles himself is a fantastic visual creation, full of life and energy when heās at the heart of things and more slight and held back when unsure of himself. Everything about the design of Miles, from the rather sad looking āmerchā version of the costume to his full embrace of Spider-Man looks stunning. Thereās a genuineness to the way that Miles looks that effortlessly places him as one of the best ā if not the best ā designed Spider-Man of them all. Villainometer ā How Does This Movieās Plan Seem And How Goes The Costuming?
Well, itās not really costuming, is it? But as previously mentioned Kingpin looks amazing ā stylistically different from anything around him but still a brooding, hulking presence sustained by a perfectly underplayed performance. Kingpin never raises his voice or displays much emotion beyond regret yet thereās never even the slightest doubt about just how dangerous this character is. In terms of his plan ā find another version of his family somewhere out in the multiverse ā itās again refreshing to have a villain motivated by something other than power or greed. His lone goal is to reunite with his loved ones and everything else ā from individuals to the entirety of New York ā are simply irrelevant collateral damage. That allows the motivation to remain small-scale yet provide real danger, a neat balancing act that really does emphasise how threatening Kingpin is here. Heās not trying to destroy anything but absolutely does not care one bit if he does. Doc Ock, the other ostensible villain, seems mostly to be in it for the excuse to shriek and stomp about the place and you know ā thereās nothing wrong with that at all. What Else Happened In 2018?
The biggest movie of the year, shocking exactly nobody, was Avengers: Infinity War, though Black Panther takes the Number 2 slot. Professional Lip-Syncher Rami Malek steps into the limelight as Freddie Mercury in the inexplicably-popular Bohemian Rhapsody (heās great ā the movie very much isnāt) and, in movies that might actually have been improved by lip-synching, unnecessarily sequel Mama Mia: Here We Go Again continues to do unseemly things to Abbaās back catalogue. The Potter-verse lurches unsteadily forward with Fantastic Beasts: The Crime Of Grindelwald and Terry Gilliam finally defies the Fates and manages to get The Man Who Killed Don Quixote released. Was anyone asking for a new Johnny English movie? Apparently so, since Strikes Again is released in autumn, and in fractionally more credible spy movie news the Mission Impossible series racks up its sixth entry with Fallout. The final Fifty Shades movie, Freed is released to pretty much zero interest, and spectacularly dull remake Tomb Raider achieves much the same. And so does the dismal, joyless spot-the-reference Spielberg-helmed Ready Player One. Star Wars manages to climb on board the underwhelming bandwagon as well with Solo ā not bad as such, should have been so much better ā and in December Mary Poppins Returns, but never gives us a good reason as to why she should. Rankings: 1. Into The Spider-Verse
2. Spider-Man 2
3. Spiderman: Homecoming
4. The Amazing Spider-Man 2
5. Spider-Man
6. The Amazing Spider-Man
7. Spider-Man 3Next Time On Prole Hole vs Spider-Man...Ok so this was done out of sequence - not inappropriate, given the nature of the Spider-Verse - so next time we'll bring Tom Holland's second movie into the limelight with Euro-jaunt Far From Home.
|
|
ABz Bš¹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,993
|
Post by ABz Bš¹anaz on May 31, 2021 10:31:27 GMT -5
Into The Spider-Verse (2018) I insisted on seeing this in 3D at the theater, and I was frickin' amazed at it. The juggling of comic-book style art with awesome animation AND perfect 3D was so cool. And then that final battle came along and BLEW MY MIND. HOLY MOTHERFORKING SHIRTBALLS. I have never seen 3D used that well. The entire battle, with tons of random shit flying around, and yet not ONCE was I lost on what was going on. That is a frickin' MIRACLE of animation. I literally sat there with my jaw open for the entire thing. You're absolutely right that this movie is perfect. I put it on for my daughter last year, and ended up watching the whole thing again with her, and she loved it too despite having virtually no experience with Spider-Man before.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on May 31, 2021 11:16:53 GMT -5
Into The Spider-Verse (2018) I insisted on seeing this in 3D at the theater, and I was frickin' amazed at it. The juggling of comic-book style art with awesome animation AND perfect 3D was so cool. And then that final battle came along and BLEW MY MIND. HOLY MOTHERFORKING SHIRTBALLS. I have never seen 3D used that well. The entire battle, with tons of random shit flying around, and yet not ONCE was I lost on what was going on. That is a frickin' MIRACLE of animation. I literally sat there with my jaw open for the entire thing. You're absolutely right that this movie is perfect. I put it on for my daughter last year, and ended up watching the whole thing again with her, and she loved it too despite having virtually no experience with Spider-Man before. There is no movie I can think of that I want a revival of more than Spider-Verse so I can go see it on the big screen. I have a decent size TV (55") which supports 3D and you know - it looked just stunning. I can only begin to imagine how much better it is in a theatre.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on May 31, 2021 11:26:55 GMT -5
It's basically unfair to compare Spider-Verse with any live-action Spider-Man. Leaving aside all the things about it that are done so well, just the fact that it is animated gives it a huge leg up. The contortions and physicality just of Spider-Man swinging are so comparatively easy to illustrate that any live-action rendering is at a disadvantage. No matter how much CGI they add in, it has to blend with a human in a silly costume. This is why why favorite sequence of the movie is learning to swing with Peter, Miles, and Doc Ock. Animation is the ideal form for any comic book story.
This is also the first time we've seen a Spider-Man who is a real adult. Tobey Maguire is still taking college classes in at least 2 and is some kind of very young in 3. Peter Parker's problems don't end with high school, and it's not just high school problems that make him relatable. This Peter Parker is weathered by a life but an inarguable pro in the suit, and it's just great to see someone really good at the job.
Miles himself I liked, but honestly I liked the movie around him a lot more. This is fine knowing that there will be a sequel when it's all on him.
Gwen Stacy was great. I'm less excited about the other alternate-universe characters who are good for gags but don't have much weight on the story. The Miles-verse villains that make relatively brief appearances look awesome but mostly make me want to see them in some incarnation as feature-length villains. Particularly Livia Octavius, just amazing in every respect.
The movie was a real visual feast on the big screen that doesn't work nearly as well on TV. It is maybe the best argument going for why movie theaters are better than streaming.
|
|
repulsionist
TI Forumite
actively disinterested
Posts: 3,690
|
Post by repulsionist on May 31, 2021 19:36:19 GMT -5
I certainly agree with your effusiveness and exuberance in the review. I'm sure you thought of it while you were composing this thorough essay, but I would have liked to see a few words about Prowler. For my in-cinema-3D experience first time through (no thirst intended, bro) the interconnected-with-Miles spin and update to a nostalgia-bong-rip-for-me villain brought tears when he first appears.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Jun 5, 2021 11:10:28 GMT -5
Miles himself I liked, but honestly I liked the movie around him a lot more. This is fine knowing that there will be a sequel when it's all on him.
Gwen Stacy was great. I'm less excited about the other alternate-universe characters who are good for gags but don't have much weight on the story. The Miles-verse villains that make relatively brief appearances look awesome but mostly make me want to see them in some incarnation as feature-length villains.
I have mixed feelings here. I had hoped we were going to have a Miles movie. But Issa Rae is really good, and Spider-Gwen is back somehow despite being from another dimension. And the more focus on a bunch of spider-heroes the less time there is for villains.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Jun 13, 2021 9:13:36 GMT -5
Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) We turn to the second ā so far ā of Tom Hollandās Spider-Man movies, but can Far From Home keep up the quality of his first entry? Pre-Existing Prejudices: Well, thereās a reason I ended up covering Into The Spider-Verse slightly out of sequence, which is to say I donāt remember being especially impressed with this. Jake Gyllenhaal has never been a big favourite, which is a bit of a problem when heās cast as the central villain. But the charming cast from the first movie are all back in place and thatās always something to be appreciative of. Any Other Business: ā¢ Setting anything after Endgame and The Blip is always going to be challenging and the movie, to its credit, wastes no time in dealing with this directly ā acknowledging how strange it is to come back five years later and find friends and relationships changed forever, how the world is still reacting to that, and so forth. The intentionally-cheesy school AV Club ātributeā does some nice heavy lifting there. ā¢ Plenty of expanded screen time for Nick Fury and Happy, which is always (well, mostly) welcome, and the beat of Happy and Aunt May being into each other is pleasingly different. ā¢ Though this is a very different Aunt May from the kindly, older version weāre usually presented with, much younger, sexier and more confident. ā¢ Much expanded role, too, for Zendaya as MJ, by miles the best MJ weāve had so far. Confident, assured, with enough vulnerability to feel real, and smart. Once again we ask ā how has it taken this long to get MJ right? ā¢ You know, the whole āPeter Tingleā thing really isnāt as funny as the movie thinks it is. Once, maybe, but thatās enough. ā¢ The film does a good job of pulling on the surrogate-father thread between Peter and Tony Stark without over-milking it. Of course Peter is going to be feeling the loss of his mentor but his grief is very different to that of the world around him also mourning the passing of Iron Man. ā¢ Lots of nice tourist shots of Europe make a refreshing palette-cleanser from Endgameās grim battlefields and casualties. ā¢ Then Mysterio shows up and the movie, which had been sustaining its low-key charm pretty well, staggers and never really recovers. Mysterio as a pre-reveal superhero is lame and as a post-reveal bad guy is also lame. In other words, lame. Gyllenhaal is perfectly understandable casting but also perfectly wrong. His miscasting stands out precisely because Marvel are normally so good at getting casting right (or at worst, neutral). ā¢ His motivations ā revenge for being slighted by Stark, along with a raft of other people also slighted by Stark ā is another in-theory success but I canāt help but feel the whole movie could have been solved by just sitting Beck / Mysterio down, giving him a nice cup of tea and telling him to move on and get over it. The idea is solid, in other words, but the execution doesnāt land. ā¢ Speaking of, Tonyās AI Glasses Of Power, E.D.I.T.H., a bog-standard McGuffin and nothing more. The one scene where Gyllenhaal really works is the bar scene with Tom Holland as Peter admits his insecurities and eventually gives Beck control of E.D.I.T.H. Thereās a great rapport between Holland and Gyllenhaal there, and we needed much more of that for the betrayal to carry any weight, rather than immediately going for the ta-da moment and deflating it straight away. ā¢ Good to see that Flash Johnson is always a dick though on a school-level, Peterās main arch nemesis is Brad Davis, played well by Remy Hii, who battles ā is that the word? ā for MJās affections. ā¢ All of the battles ā with one major exception ā have a real thatāll-do energy about them. Theyāre all perfectly fine, perfectly well realised and fill up the requisite amount of screen time but thereās a real nagging feeling of them being perfunctory. ā¢ The major exception is, of course, when Peter steps inside Mysterioās illusions. The scene, especially, where Mysterio basically tortures Peter until he gets hit by a train is visually stunning and starts to approach the innovation and reality-stretching of Into The Spider-Verse. ā¢ Man, those tulip growers in the Netherlands are gonna be pissed at a jet landing and damaging their crop. Just see how nice the Dutch are then! ā¢ Final battle ā yeah. Usual lazy cliches about London (Tower of London, black cab, red bus et ai) ā yup. The fight is well staged but continues the by-clockwork arrangement of the script, with the lone excellent (as opposed to āfineā) moment being Peterās final defeat of Mysterio, by learning that heād use an illusion of himself and not falling for it. ā¢ Nedās little romance, which ends with the movie, is really very charming and Ned comes off as a great character here. ā¢ Gasp! Everyone knows who Spider-Man is now! Etcetera. Well at least JK Simmons shows up in the end credits. In Conclusion: The idea of a palette-cleanser movie after the ponderous, self-serious Endgame is one which makes perfect sense. And, given the monumental ā and indeed basically conclusive ā ending of that film, finding a way forwards for the MCU is both necessary and something that shouldnāt be oversold. And giving all that work to the generally lighter, less self-important Spider-Man has a logic about it too. What a pity, then, that what we get isnāt so much lighter as lightweight. Because thatās really the problem with this movie ā thereās just no substance to it. This film doesnāt want to make Big Important Statements, but thatās a bit of a problem with a movie that goes so out of its way to acknowledge the effects of The Blip and all that came with it. Instead, having raised the subject, The Blip is then treated as fodder for a few comic bits, like a weedy little boy growing up to be a confident, hot teenager pursuing MJ, and is entirely side-lined for a āwelp guess the world is fine, enjoy your vacation!ā plot. And thatās not the only contradiction. The movie wants to go small-scale, then immediately sends its protagonist and friends off to the other side of the world on a big-ass Euro-jaunt, which does not scream āsmall scaleā (I mean, it is next to Endgame but then again so is almost anything next to Endgame). So off we pop with some fun shenanigans andā¦ yeah thatās about it. And therein lies the rub. The film never gets out of āfun shenanigansā mode, and while much of the material with Peterās classmates mucking around on a low-stakes trip (watched over by the insanely well-chosen double-act of JB Smoove and Martin Starr) is both charming and low-key entertaining, when it comes to building up some kind of threat ā i.e. some reason for the movie to actually exist beyond filling Marvelās coffers ā it never shifts out of that mode, not even when Mysterio stands revealed and is ripping up familiar tourist spots in London. Mysterio is a huge hole at the centre of this movie, never remotely threatening and, sadly, never remotely interesting either. The whole bluff, whereby Mysterio persuades everyone heās from another dimension fighting monsters but actually heās from this one and just a bitter little man, needs to have some weight to it and it simply doesnāt. Mysterio reeks of āwho cares?ā and the stench just never leaves him. Aww, diddums got done bad by some rich asshole. Sure makes you something special, eh? Mmm, not so much. Jake Gyllenhaal is, fundamentally, part of the problem here, not convincing as a superhero and never even faintly threatening as a bad guy. Thatās at least in part because Gyllenhaal doesnāt appear to have the range to shift tones from one version to the other. Sure he sneers a bit once we find out heās actually the bad guy but itās really not up to much. All of Mysterioās limited successes are technical, in fact ā his capturing of Peter in Berlin is a great piece of cinematography but itās got sod all to do with Gyllenhaal, who just churns out the lines. What the role needs is someone with a magnetic personality, someone who can hold a scene or screen simply by being there. A Dennis Haysbert maybe. Someone like that. Someone who can inspire instant trust so that when that trust is subverted it gives some substance to the performance and to the character. Still, itās not like heās alone ā none of the adult cast are up to much this time out. Samuel L Jackson has rarely made less of an effort in a movie and seems barely even to be in the scenes heās actually present for. Given the amount of screen-time heās got thatās a bit of a problem. Happy comes off a bit better, but itās a minor role at best and thereās not a huge amount of rapport between Jon Favreau and Tom Holland this time out, not even when Happy rescues Peter from the Netherlands. Most of the other adult roles ā from grim Fury aide Dimitri to Aunt May ā get so little screen-time they barely even register, though Marisa Tomei does her best to make what limited material she has sparkle. The adolescent cast are substantially better, thankfully, and Zendaya (as MJ) and Jacob Batalon (as Ned) are given a noticeable step-up in terms of their contributions and both rise successfully to the occasion. Ned describing being tranquilised by Nick Fury as probably the coolest thing thatās ever happened to him feels perfectly in character, and the smartness given to MJ ā whoās about two-thirds sure she worked out Peter was Spider-Man ā is such a refreshing change from the peril monkey sheās normally written as. Thereās a nice little spark between Zendaya and Tom Holland, too, and Holland does great work bringing across the nervousness of a teenager who can battle alien monsters with aplomb but has a hard time giving a girl he likes a simple present. Holland, characteristically, is absolutely fine here, but the script muddles the idea that the world wants him to grow up and be an Avenger and ā especially given the death of his friend and mentor ā the fact that he wants a bit of time to go on holiday and hang out with his pals. Holland does his best to make that material hang together, but ultimately thereās just not enough of it in the film for it to work. Fury ā nice underground base in Venice, by the way ā just comes out and pretty much states that as the thesis of the movie and the audience are expected to nod and go āoh, rightā without enough other legwork to make that convincing. Itās mentioned from time to time, certainly, but it never really feels integrated, as such. And thatās kind of it. It would be nice if there were more to say about this movie, but ultimately there just isnāt. Itāsā¦ fine. Pleasant. Unremarkable. But āunremarkableā just feels like a waste of the talent involved. Thereās a few bright spots, a few obvious mistakes and thereās nothing thatās a complete disaster. Fine. Cool. All good? On we goā¦ Script v Length: More Or Less?
More script, less length, sāil vous plait. At a generous two hours and ten minutes the pace here is just a little too languid and mechanical to really get much of a sense of excitement going ā this is not a story that requires over two hours to tell. By contrast, Homecoming is almost exactly the same length and had fewer actual fight scenes but was able to successfully anchor the in-between bits with a stellar Michael Keaton performance and weld that to the on-going story. That meant when the fights did turn up they felt like they were there for a reason. Here itās all so rote ā big battle with Water elemental, big battle with Fire elemental, tick-tock, here we go. Iād rather fewer battles and a bit of character work that actually mattered. Now, if one was feeling generous ā too generous, letās be honest ā one could argue that they first couple of battles are meant to feel rote because they are, itās just Mysterioās projections and not an actual conflict. Eh. Na. How Convincing Does This Webslinger Look?
The shiny-metal version of the suit, as seen early on, is simply hideous, so itās something of a relief when itās finally ditched in favour of something a little more traditional. The regular suit looks fine. And thereās the whole āNight Monkeyā black āversionā which I guess works in context. Best of all, though, is the red-and-black version seen at the end of the movie as Spider-Man meets up with MJ shortly before being outed. Itās a small, subtle change moving the blue to black but it works really rather well. As for how good Spider-Man looks flouncing about Venice, Prague and London, well, heās fine. Weāve gotten to the point that Spider-Man can be pretty much dropped into any location and look convincing. Thatās not to undersell the amount of work it takes to make that happen, but really, he looks great. Villainometer ā How Does This Movieās Plan Seem And How Goes The Costuming?
Mysterioās Crystal Ball Helmet Of Doom looks stupid. Thereās just no getting away from it. Yes, of course itās what he has in the comics and the animated versions. It looks stupid there too. Effectively realised, sure, but dumb. The rest of his look is bog-standard future-armour with a fractional disco spin but it is ā and you might be rather gathering this is the theme here ā somewhat ordinary and unimpressive when all is said and done. As for the plan, well, yes the motivation is pleasingly non-taking-over-the-world but the script never really manages to make his petty vengeances resonate in quite the right way. All the bits are there, but they just donāt amount to all that much. Maybe itās Gyllenhallās performance, which canāt quite dig into the spite really required to pull this off. Maybe itās because even by his own laconic standards, Samuel L Jackson really isnāt trying a leg here and if Nick Fury isnāt taking this guy all that seriously why should we bother? At least the fact that heās backed up by a bunch of people with the same motivation helps explain why he has all these techno-wizards to help out but none of them are worth more than about two or three sentence,s even when theyāve been in previous Marvel movies, and theyāre impossible to care about. What Else Happened in *checks dates* 2019? Really? Ok, What Else Happened In 2019, Apparently.
The third Star Wars trilogy draws to a close with the poorly-received The Rise Of Skywalker, while Marvel is all over the place with Captain Marvel (not that good), Avengers: Endgame (the biggest movie of the year, great), and Far From Home takes the Number 4 slot of highest grossing movies. Joaquin Phoenix redefines the idea of a villain origin story with a stunning performance in Joker ā shame the movie isnāt quite as good as he is, though he snags an Oscar for the performance ā and Toy Story gets on the unnecessary-sequel bandwagon with its fourth entry. Danny Boyleās curio Yesterday imagines a world without The Beatles, and dreary class-tourism soap-opera Downton Abbey makes the jump from the small screen to the big one. Godzilla becomes King Of The Monsters, the Terminator franchise has a Dark Fate ( itās rather good, in fact) and the Rambo series splutters to a worthless close with Last Blood. Sam Mendes does the whole real-time thing with war movie 1917, and the very definition of a fiasco, Cats, is sicked up at the end of the year. And at the age of 97, Doris Day passes away. Rankings: 1. Into The Spider-Verse
2. Spider-Man 2
3. Spider-Man: Homecoming
4. The Amazing Spider-Man 2
5. Spider-Man
6. Spider-Man: Far From Home
7. The Amazing Spider-Man
8. Spider-Man 3
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Jun 13, 2021 17:31:16 GMT -5
I rewatched FFH a couple months ago for the first time since the theater in anticipation of this, and I have thoughts.
This is the best possible film version of Mysterio that was ever going to exist. The character is a Silver Age refugee and has been something of an in-universe joke for decades. They didn't even have to change much besides giving him an anti-Stark team to help. In this century Mysterio is worthy of the Spider-Man daily comic strip and that's about it. But sheesh, they're almost out of the original and most iconic villains for a screen debut (Spider-Man is not famous enough yet to be targeted by Kraven the Hunter, the Chameleon can't center a story while you've got Mystique on-screen for 18 years, and that's about it). I take a less-dim view of Gyllenhaal here; they needed a big-enough name who could play an insane control freak, and the center of Nightcrawler was a fair choice. The writing around these options was reasonably clever in continuing the MCU theme of "on some level a lot of this is Tony Stark's fault".
I like JB Smoove fine on Curb, but gosh he did not need to be in this movie. The comedy should come from the kids and Peter ("I'm strong and I can stick to stuff!"). The kid ensemble continues to be excellent.
While the fake monster fights are lame, there are two fight sequences that are super good: vs. Mysterio's illusions in the construction zone(?) and the final battle. The former has excellent imagery, the best in the MCU since Dr. Strange. The latter is simply the best exhibition of Spider-Manning captured in live action to date. Almost all of Tom Holland's fight scenes before this movie had been in weird settings for the character that have him physically isolated; going inside the illusion is all about acrobatics and web-slinging, right in his element. Like the adult Spider-Man in Spider-Verse, this is just great to watch. Regardless of the Peter-tingle, this is also the only significant (and first?) use of Spider-sense since the Raimi debut.
Cool as it is to have J.K. Simmons back, the tease is kind of funny. Spider-Man is ...Peter Parker!! Everybody else:
The whole Fury thing was screwy from the get-go. I'm not sure that made the Skrull joke actually good; I guess it's meta with the illusion theme.
The fridge-logic elephant in the room remains Tony Stark, and not just in-movie. Leaving aside the actual act of giving a space-based drone army to a kid he barely expresses concern for...when did he decide this? Between the events of Homecoming and Infinity War, because that's all that is possible. The only way that isn't whimsical madness is if there are movie-level bonding events during that time period that we never see. Those would at least explain going from "good job on being mature for a 15-year-old" to mourning him in Endgame. It's weird that none of this is ever mentioned. This movie was pretty good, but I kind of hope its events are never mentioned again.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Jun 13, 2021 18:09:34 GMT -5
Leaving aside the actual act of giving a space-based drone army to a kid he barely expresses concern for...when did he decide this? Between the events of Homecoming and Infinity War, because that's all that is possible. The only way that isn't whimsical madness is if there are movie-level bonding events during that time period that we never see. Those would at least explain going from "good job on being mature for a 15-year-old" to mourning him in Endgame. It's weird that none of this is ever mentioned. This movie was pretty good, but I kind of hope its events are never mentioned again.
I think the night before the Endgame final battle, right when he made the recording for his daughter. I think it was a way of expressing how confident he was that it would work. It seems like something he'd be more likely to do after five years of guilt eating away at him than he would while he was having to deal actively with a mildly annoying teenager.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Jun 13, 2021 20:34:27 GMT -5
Ā Leaving aside the actual act of giving a space-based drone army to a kid he barely expresses concern for...when did he decide this? Between the events of Homecoming and Infinity War, because that's all that is possible. The only way that isn't whimsical madness is if there are movie-level bonding events during that time period that we never see. Those would at least explain going from "good job on being mature for a 15-year-old" to mourning him in Endgame. It's weird that none of this is ever mentioned. This movie was pretty good, but I kind of hope its events are never mentioned again.
I think the night before the Endgame final battle, right when he made the recording for his daughter. I think it was a way of expressing how confident he was that it would work. It seems like something he'd be more likely to do after five years of guilt eating away at him than he would while he was having to deal actively with a mildly annoying teenager. Hm, interesting theory. Since earlier in the movie he was crowing about how he wanted a suit or armor for the world, I guess he could have spent 5 years in retirement making a drone army and not telling anyone. Or using it in the all-time climactic battle.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Jun 16, 2021 7:30:55 GMT -5
I take a less-dim view of Gyllenhaal here; they needed a big-enough name who could play an insane control freak, and the center of Nightcrawler was a fair choice. I think the problem is that ultimately Gyllenhaal doesn't, to me, convince as someone who can play an insane control freak, or at the most generous end of the spectrum doesn't manage it here. I agree that's what the movie needs, I just don't think it's what it gets. Rhino just never gets the love he deserves. But on another level my feeling is "well, do something original then" but would that drive the Marvel fanpeople crazy? I'm not nearly plugged into that whole fandom to know whether there's some drive that only comic-book villains can actually appear but yeah, what would be the reason not to? Mysterio's a joke - ok then... don't use Mysterio? Or cast someone better as Mysterio? Or... no wait, it's the first one. Just don't use him.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Jun 16, 2021 8:08:09 GMT -5
Rhino just never gets the love he deserves. But on another level my feeling is "well, do something original then" but would that drive the Marvel fanpeople crazy? I'm not nearly plugged into that whole fandom to know whether there's some drive that only comic-book villains can actually appear but yeah, what would be the reason not to? Mysterio's a joke - ok then... don't use Mysterio? Or cast someone better as Mysterio? Or... no wait, it's the first one. Just don't use him. Making up someone new is a total non-starter when it comes to any long-established character on this level of public recognition, not just comic book heroes. It's why we keep getting Jokers and Generals Zod. I think the fans are happy to see what can be done in a situation like this, as long as its not a total disaster. I'd say it was far from that, even if it's not on the level of The Vulture.
I'm still waiting for the full realization of a Michael Mando Scorpion, but "insane tech genius" is more in the MCU wheelhouse right now than "souped-up thug" (speaking of the Rhino).
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Jun 16, 2021 9:47:57 GMT -5
I take a less-dim view of Gyllenhaal here; they needed a big-enough name who could play an insane control freak, and the center of Nightcrawler was a fair choice. I think the problem is that ultimately Gyllenhaal doesn't, to me, convince as someone who can play an insane control freak, or at the most generous end of the spectrum doesn't manage it here. I agree that's what the movie needs, I just don't think it's what it gets. Rhino just never gets the love he deserves. But on another level my feeling is "well, do something original then" but would that drive the Marvel fanpeople crazy? I'm not nearly plugged into that whole fandom to know whether there's some drive that only comic-book villains can actually appear but yeah, what would be the reason not to? Mysterio's a joke - ok then... don't use Mysterio? Or cast someone better as Mysterio? Or... no wait, it's the first one. Just don't use him. Rhino was in ASM 2. Granted, as a tertiary villain, but we've still seen him onscreen.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Dec 17, 2021 8:52:51 GMT -5
It's been pretty widely reviewed by now how dancin' Peter Parker in Spider-Man 3 is not supposed to be cool, but Cracked actually has a good article discussing the in-movie flaws of Peter Parker and how the theme ties together.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 17, 2021 9:24:16 GMT -5
It's been pretty widely reviewed by now how dancin' Peter Parker in Spider-Man 3 is not supposed to be cool, but Cracked actually has a good article discussing the in-movie flaws of Peter Parker and how the theme ties together. The emo Peter stuff was never my problem with the movie; it was Venom being crowbarred into an already crowded plot, and the idiotic "Sandman killed Uncle Ben" retcon that bugged me more than anything.
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Dec 18, 2021 6:22:31 GMT -5
It's been pretty widely reviewed by now how dancin' Peter Parker in Spider-Man 3 is not supposed to be cool, but Cracked actually has a good article discussing the in-movie flaws of Peter Parker and how the theme ties together. The emo Peter stuff was never my problem with the movie; it was Venom being crowbarred into an already crowded plot, and the idiotic "Sandman killed Uncle Ben" retcon that bugged me more than anything. The retcon is awful, and Sandman was a good enough and interesting enough bad guy to carry the movie (FWIW, and adjacent, I wrote up Venom: Let There Be Carnage on my blog and the review consisted of seven words - what an absolute piece of shit movie. I maintain - Venom sucks). I'll write up the latest as and when I get a chance to see it!
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Dec 25, 2021 14:23:20 GMT -5
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) ā¢ Of course the Big Point here is Gwenās death. Itās handled excellently, sheās not fridged (more on this below) and both Stone and Garfield are excellent in the moment. Even Spider-Man canāt win every time. ā¢ Even Gwenās funeral isnāt mawkish, and of course the film ends with Spider-Man returning to the fight in a scene which is genuinely sweet and charming despite, you know, the Russian Mafia guy in the huge Rhino battle-armour. In Conclusion: Because though Garfield gave it his best shot last time out, there was something off about the way the script landed the characterisations of both Peter and Spider-Man. Here thereās a real sense that those details have been rectified. During the big battles throughout the film, this Spider-Man really feels like Spider-Man. Heās funny and quippy without feeling irritating, the effects make great use of the character as he gets thrown about and thereās just a great pleasure in watching Spider-Man really be Spider-Man. In all of this, Andrew Garfield is clearly in his element and having a whale of a time bringing the character to life. While never bad in the previous movie heās moved up a whole level here, engaged and active and just relishing the chance to be a super-hero. Its a rather charming performance all round, but the movie also doesnāt forget that that Spider-Man isnāt just about stopping the big villains. Heās a friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man too, which means we get to see him stopping a kid from being bullied or whatever ā low-level, normal problems that exist in the real world but which most super-heroes simply wouldnāt bother with. Itās what makes the character of Spider-Man so appealing and the film never forgets this. This is the best characterisation weāve had of Spider-Man since Spider-Man 2 in fact and it just feels authentic. Peter, too, has come much more into focus here. The script slightly mishandles the way Peter pursues Gwen ā occasionally tipping over into the you-think-this-is-romantic-but-itās-creepy territory such as following her around ā but because Garfield gives real heart to his Peter this time out, and because thereās a genuine spark between him and Emma Stone, the movie pretty much gets away with it. Thereās a proper sense that the relationship between these two characters is complicated and messy in the way that real-life relationships are for characters like these, and that makes everything that happens between them feel realistic. The whole emotional core of the movie resting on Peter and Gwen is only going to work if we actually think these two people care about each other and have that extra something, and thankfully they absolutely do. And oh yes, we absolutely have to talk about Gwen this time out. Because sheās been the best-handled female character across all the movies so far covered. Sheās independent, has career and life ambitions which donāt simply follow in the wake of either her boyfriend or family, sheās brave and committed to doing the right thing regardless of consequences, and sheās also extremely likeable and easy to be around. She is, in other words, a proper, fully rounded character in a way that Mary Jane simply hasnāt been up till now. Her desire to go to England to study could seem contrived as a way of getting Our Hero to swoop in and beg her to stay as it might be in any given rom-com but in fact itās played completely the other way ā instead of Gwen being asked to give up her ambitions and remain in New York because Peter loves her, instead Peter says heāll come to England and be with her there. āThey have crime in England, right?ā asks Peter, and itās just so, so refreshing to see a character like Gwen being written with agency and for the movie not to fall in to the usual lazy ācouple in loveā clichĆ©s. And this is perhaps no more true than when it comes to Gwenās death, because the character is allowed to be brave and resourceful, help defeat Electro, and yet still loses her life because in the end the Green Goblin was just one obstacle too many for Peter to be able to deal with. Whatās most impressive about this is the fact that Gwen is absolutely, categorically not fridged. It would have been easy to have her death early on and for that to be the motivating factor behind Peter taking on the bad guys. Instead, sheās allowed to stand as a character, do the right thing when itās required, and though it in the end costs Gwen her life it doesnāt undermine her as a character nor does it make her sacrifice a simple extension of whatās going on with Peter. Even more impressively, although itās Gwen that motivates Peter to get back in to the Spider-Man game months after her death, itās not her death itself that motivates him, itās watching her graduation speech. Peter is, in other words, motivated by her words of hope and optimism and kindness, not by revenge or anger. Thatās incredibly well handled and itās absolutely right for the character of Spider-Man. Heās not a furious ball of grimdark, heās a friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man and itās absolutely correct that itās something aspirational that gets him back to being a super-hero but at the same time the importance of it being Gwen thatās responsible for it is allowed to stand. Itās a simply fantastic piece of writing. Gwen might, in fact, be the best realised character across any of these movies. <snip> Part of the fun of doing a review project like this is finding neglected gems and getting to appreciate them and thatās absolutely what The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is ā a neglected gem that deserves way more attention that it gets. This is really something of an unexpected triumph. If they ended this with the cemetery scene, Peter looking down at the Gwen's grave, snow falling around him while he quietly grieves, and then cut to black and rolled credits, people would be bawling. They'd leave the theater feeling like they just had to shoot their own horse, and would remember this as the best Spiderman, and maybe even one of the best super hero movies. Save Gwen's speech and the Rhino fight for Amazing 3 and just let actions have consequences and sacrifices mean something for one movie. The whole 'coda' takes the edge off of an ending that should cut so sharp you don't even feel it for the first 30 seconds.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Dec 25, 2021 14:35:21 GMT -5
Raimi 1 & 2 weren't written to be 'Post 9/11' movies, and they famously had to edit the 'Twin Towers' trailer (or just ditch it altoghether?), but it's hard to overstate just how much the reaction to the movies was a result of the attacks. Spidey is arguably the most *New York* superhero in Marvel's catalog. He's the scrappy, quippy, friendly, best version of our selves. He might not have much, he might get kicked around a lot, but he's gonna keep getting up to fight back harder, but not meaner. 2, especially, with the riff on the 'Spiderman no more!' arc, really hit those 'I'm so tired of this, but I'm gonna keep going' buttons that probably affected most of the country, but really hit New Yorkers.
Battlestar Galactica was a better interrogation of our responses, but for pure feels, the first 2 Spideys were probably the biggest things going
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Feb 13, 2022 13:56:48 GMT -5
Review incoming within (hopefully) a week!
|
|
|
Post by Prole Hole on Feb 14, 2022 12:29:50 GMT -5
Spider-Man - No Way Home (2021)
Itās time for Tom Hollandās third outing as the webslinger, but how do things go now everyone knows Peterās secret identity? Pre-Existing Prejudices: None. Which is to say, this is the first Spider-Man movie Iāll be writing up concurrent with its release, rather than retrospectively. Despite itās generally good reception I remain somewhat underwhelmed by Far From Home, so Iām hoping for a course-correction this time out. Whatās It All About, Proley? Mysterio, being kind of a dick, revealed to the world that Spider-Manās true secret identity is in fact high-school kid Peter Parker! This, understandably, fucks with his life so he goes to Dr Strange to ask him to cast a spell so everyone forgets who he is. Things Go Wrong, so we get treated to a multi-franchise pile-up as previous Spider-Men and their associated bad guys turn up to do battle in this universe. With the usual assist from Ned and MJ, theyāre stopped and everything is put right, but at the cost of everyone forgetting Peter, so he loses his girlfriend and his best friend to set the world right. Any Other Business: ā¢ This movie follows on directly from Far From Home, which means that no time has passed at all, and the āPeter Is Spider-manā reveal is a fresh wound, rather than something thatās scabbed over after the passing of some time. ā¢ It takes about all of four minutes before Tom Holland gets his shirt off. Gets it out of the way I suppose. ā¢ Happy and Aunt May have split up. While I appreciate the effort to give Happy an anchor to whatās going on in the Spider-Movies, Iām not entirely sure this thread has worked. ā¢ The supreme awkwardness of Peterās real identity being used as a proxy for teenage awkwardness in general could have been leaned into a little more, but it works well. ā¢ As does the fact that the reveal doesnāt just bugger up his life but costs Ned and MJ their place at MIT as well. Enough effort has been invested in the friendship with Ned and the relationship with MJ that this actually carries some weight. ā¢ Fuck me, Daredevil! Yes and please! āIām a very good lawyer.ā Heh. ā¢ And Wong is the Sorcerer Supreme! ā¢ Dr Strangeās, āwait, you didnāt even try and call them?ā moment is nicely played. ā¢ The whole bridge battle with Doc Ock is just supremely wonderful. Itās just utterly brilliant to have Molina back in the role, and of course developments in special effects since he last donned the robotic arms means he gets to do a whole lot more damage. ā¢ Very clunky, āyou are a hero!ā line after Spider-Man saves the MIT admissions officer. Yeah, we know. ā¢ Oh and here comes the Green Goblin too! Lovely. ā¢ One of the things that the MCU has often struggled with is having memorable villains. Falcon worked well enough in the first Holland Spider-Man movie, but Mysterio was pretty much a bust and there have been a lot of so-so bad guys for Our Heroes to square up against. How refreshing it is, then, to see the likes of Doc Ock and the Goblin, clear distinct villains who have actual weight to them (ditto the Lizard, Electro and Sandman) played by actors who really invest in them. By showing how well the Maguire and Garfield Spider-Movies did their villains it does kind of highlight how the MCU has struggled somewhat. ā¢ Speaking of other Spider-Menā¦ Andrew Garfield was the big surprise here, and Toby Maguire is back too. Given Garfieldās movies are generally regarded as the weakest of the Spider-Man film, Garfield is relaxed and supremely confident returning to play Peter and No Way Home just goes to show how great he is in the role. Maguire is a little more variable - occasionally charming, occasionally wooden. Regardless, though, itās really rather lovely to have them all here. ā¢ Demystifying the Mirror Dimension as āhey itās just geometry, I can do that!ā is a nice way of demonstrating how smart Peter is rather than just being told about it, though itās hard not to get the impression that Strange is defeated, then trapped, a little easily, and more for plot-convenient reasons than anything else. ā¢ Peterās attempts to help everyone, especially a de-controlled Octavius (another great piece of work from Molina) is sweet but the movie really lets Peter off the hook for the fact that everything that goes wrong here is basically his fault (and Dr Strangeās, to be fair, who should never have agreed to cast the spell in the first place), and none moreso than when Aunt May dies. Marisa Tomei, finally given something substantial to do, is fantastic, she gets the āwith great powerā speech. Her death scene is genuinely moving. ā¢ Thereās something quite pleasing about the fact that, in the Maguireverse and the Garfieldverse, itās Uncle Ben who dies whereas in the Hollandverse itās Aunt May. Itās a good way of nodding to the fact that their universes are parallel to ours but still different. Facts like they donāt have the Avengers in them are the big sweeping differences (great points too for Garfieldās Peter asking, incredulously, āare you in a band?ā) but the ground-level differences matter too. ā¢ Thereās something incredibly. sweet about the way Maguire and Holland stand around telling Garfield that heās āamazingā. As is Garfieldās slight embarrassment about having battled, āa Russian in a rhino suitā. ā¢ And, unlikely as it seems, they actually address, on screen, the fact that Maguireās Spider-Man produces his web internally. Itās still not something Iām that fussed about one way or the other, but they absolutely didnāt have to bring this up and not only does it get brought up, it actually makes for a lovely sequence as the three of them address their actual webslinging. Top marks there. ā¢ Ned can do magic. Itās a bit of a narrative short-cut, but Iām OK with it, and itās mostly played for laughs. ā¢ The climactic battle is all pretty much as you would expect, with the three Spider-Men getting to defeat all the bad guys. Thomas Hayden Church (as Sandman) and Rhys Ifans as Lizard donāt get a whole lot to do throughout the movie, but Jamie Foxx gets some great shots as Electro. ā¢ Garfieldās version gets to save a falling MJ in the way he failed to do for Gwen. It brings an unexpected lump to the throat and packs a punch I absolutely did not expect. Garfield is great in the moment (as you may have gathered, heās great all throughout this), and his earlier recollection and guilt at not saving Gwen is excellently played. ā¢ It all ends with everyone being sent back to their own dimension, but Peter sacrificing his girlfriendās love and his best friendās support to make it happen. Again, the film needed to lean more into how all of this was Peterās fault to make this resonate more, but Holland is great in the coffeeshop scene where MJ doesnāt recognise him, and his performance does manage to wring some pathos from the situation. In Conclusion:One of the principal complaints the last review had about Far From Home was, basically, it took too long to get to the damned point already, and when it did the point wasnāt really worth getting to anyway. Bit of a problem, that. Still, you canāt say that No Way Home hasnāt learned from the mistakes of its predecessor, and then some. It is, simply, the best of the three Holland Spider-Man movies, and by some considerable distance, because, above and beyond anything else, itās the one that seems to have remembered that these movies are meant to be fun. Far From Home went for a sort of shaggy-dog approach to storytelling, rambling about Europe without much sense of direction while Jake Gyllenhaalās variable attempts at being a credible bad guy never really cohered into much of anything. Thereās the shape of a decent story, and individual bits were entertaining enough, but the end result just never managed to convince in a way that squared āentertainingā with the slightly-desperate āYou! Will! Like! This!ā air that clung to events. It was scattershot, in other words. One might expect multiple returning villains, three (three!) separate Spider-Men and a whole bunch of ancillary characters to fall into the same traps, but whatās so impressive about No Way Home is that it manages to find a way to balance out all its different heroes and villains, given them all time, and still wrap up its story in a satisfying way. Sure, some get more attention paid to them than others, but the balancing act, here, is successfully executed. Over and above the returning villains and Spider-People, one additional challenge that No Way Home has to address is this - if you are going to, as a Spider-Man film, do multiversal shenanigans and have a play around in that sandbox then you have one very large shadow looming over you - Into The Spider-verse. As you may have gathered from the review of that movie, Spider-verse is basically perfect, so itās going to take some effort for this movie to not simply seem derivative of that one - a live-action version of the same thing. Impressively, though, thatās what No Way Home does. By choosing different, yet still personal, stakes, there is a similar core at the heart of both movies - the impact on Miles / Peter - but because No Way Home leans on previous movie iterations of Spider-Man, where Spider-verse leaned specifically on comic-book versions, it manages to cover similar territory but remain distinct. Thatās quite the feat, and though itās easy to miss itās absolutely one No Way Home deserves to be commended for. Itās also clear what a blast everyone is having here, and that just becomes incredibly infectious. Andrew Garfield, as mentioned, is just terrific returning to Peter, and though not quite as good itās clear that Tobey Maguire is relishing the idea of playing a slightly older version of Peter who can mentor Hollandās still-allegedly-teenage version (Holland is boyish, obviously, but come on - the days of him passing as a teenager are long gone). Every one of the returning bad guys are terrific too. Alfred Molina takes the prize for best performance, both as Octopus and the briefly-free version - assisted, admittedly, by the biggest role - but Willem Dafoe deserves special mention too. Heās just great at playing Norman, and his deranged Goblin is, if anything, even better than his original performance, genuinely disturbing in places. Basically, nobody and nothing puts a foot wrong here, and everyone is just tremendous fun to watch as they smash about the place. Is Lizard just a stompy-stompy bad guy? Sure, but at least he stomps great! Whenever the movie spends time with the bad guys itās an absolute pleasure to watch, and with that many bad guys it means thereās a lot of pleasure to be had. Peter (our Peter) is put through the wringer here, losing first his aunt to the rampaging monsters, then his best friend and love of his life to try and fix his mistake. Yet the other thing thatās impressive about Far From Home is that it doesnāt try and go grimdark or faux-serious over it. Events are difficult to deal with, and Peter learns the hard way that being a hero means you donāt get to control everything just because you want to, but the film allows a note of hope. MJ stops Peter saying, āI love youā because she believes that they will find their way back, and the final cafe scene suggests that this is, at least, a possibility. It stops the film becoming too maudlin or miserable - Spider-Man, of all the Marvel heroes, shouldnāt allow his spirit to be crushed by events, and while things are hard now thereās a suggestion that they wonāt always be. And hey - his friends got in to MIT, so thatās something! Heās helped get their lives back on track - itās not the biggest win of the movie, but itās something, and something isā¦ well, not nothing. Itās a fine balancing act, but the movie more or less gets it right. More should have been made of how much responsibility Peter bears for events here, but thereās just about enough emphasis on it for that point to be made, and in allowing Peter to learn his lessons the hard way there are enough repercussions for the point to be made. That failure to state more directly how much Peter (and, again, Dr Strange) is responsible for what happens here is really one of the very few missteps the film makes. Itās not a perfect movie, and for all that JK Simmons is simply brilliant as J Jonah Jameson, his spluttering on-screen performance doesnāt add all that much here - heās more fun chewing people out in his office, and having him trying to flog supplements after his segments is a really clumsy piece of āsatireā that doesnāt land at all. That suggests heās aligned with - or at the very least being compared to - the likes of Alex Jones, which doesnāt read right at all. Jameson is wrong about Spider-Man, and heās a hard-ass to boot, but thereās never been the suggestion that heās actively corrupt in that sort of way, just misguided and blinded by his desire to get The Big Scoop. Itās a small moment, to be sure, but itās a real bum note. Itās fine to reflect real-world events in the movies, of course, but this feels like it undermines a character for little more than a cheap shot. Slightly more effective are the āMysterio Was Rightā crowd, prepared to believe in someone demonstrably wrong regardless of how much evidence there might be to the contrary. Itās not exactly subtle, but itās a bit better at least. This review is going to be slightly shorter than the others because, well, Iāve only seen this once. Maybe my opinion will shift once Iāve had the chance to see it again, maybe its flaws will become more obvious (or not). But on an initial viewing this was pretty much great. Thereās very little to actively criticise, nothing is taken too seriously, everyoneās clearly having the time of their lives, and it doesnāt overstay its welcome. Holland is on top form, the other Spider-People slot easily into this world, and even Dr Strange - a perfectly fine Benedict Cumberbatch who turns up to do what he does in Marvel movies - is pretty well utilised. Itās not really clear at this point if Holland is going to get any more Spider-movies. If he does, this one suggests that thereās plenty more mileage that can be gotten out of this version of the character. But if he doesnāt, this is also a terrific place to end his run. Hollandās last movie gets to be the best one of his run, it is for the most part great fun to watch, and it manages to end on a note of hope that feels earned but not corny. Well, maybe just the right amount of corny. Which is just what Spider-Man should be. Script v Length: More Or Less?Itās fine. This is a movie that manages to feel brisk and well-paced, even though itās just shy of two and a half hours long. Since thereās a lot of characters to squeeze in there it makes sense that this isnāt exactly going to be a short movie, but the constant swapping between various different alignments of villains and Spider-Men keeps the sense of momentum going and the film rarely feels like it drags or comes to a standstill. Itās true that there are some places where narrative logic takes precedence over real-world logic - Peter gets a long time to say goodbye to Aunt May as she dies while the cops just stand around outside not diving into the building they have now surrounded. Why itās almost as if they know Our Hero is having a Big Emotional Moment and donāt want to disturb him! But generally speaking everything is paced well, and thereās nothing much to complain about. How Convincing Does This Webslinger Look?These, not this, since we have three of āem. And they all look fine! Well. I still donāt like the Iron Spider look of Hollandās version. It looks tacky and a bit fake (which I realise is an odd thing to say about someone dressing up as Spider-Man, but anyway) and those mechanical legs, while certainly handy in certain circumstances, feel rather like overkill. Both the Garfield and Maguire versions are as they should be, and they all look terrific webslinging their way around the Statue Of Liberty or just hanging out together and being charming. Basically - all good. Villainometer ā How Does This Movieās Plan Seem And How Goes The Costuming?Well, thereās no actual villain plan, per se, in this movie. Indeed the opposite is true, as Peter does his best to try and help the bad guys, rather than sending them back to their inevitable deaths. While that makes Peter look like a moral character - which is appropriate - it does mean that the villains donāt really get much chance to scheme. Electro is the closest to having a plan, but thatās mostly that he likes the power here and doesnāt want to go back and lose access to it. Doc Ockās arms take him back over (after that lovely, understated performance from Molina as the freed version of Octavius - āitās so quietā) so he can stomp and smash, and the rest all get the chance to turn up and do their party pieces. Hollandās Peter genuinely wanting to kill the Goblin, then being held back from it by the other Peters, allows this version to get pushed unusually far out of his comfort zone, but his eventual commitment to curing, rather than killing, comes across well and speaks volumes for the character. As for the costumes - well, theyāre all great. Jamie Foxx is spared the bald cap and prosthetic stomach this time out, so we just get the full Electro, and he has some amazing shots of lightning crackling round him. Doc Ock is All CGI All The Time now, but advances in technology from Spider-Man 2 mean that he looks fine. Ditto the Green Goblin. Only the Lizard really shows noticeable improvement from his first outing, though thatās mostly, again, because of the improvements in special effects and CGI since he was first digitally conjured forth. What Else Happened / Is Happening in 2021/2022?Stephen Spielbergās remake of West Side Story seems to have everyoneās fingers clicking as he brings the musical back to public consciousness. Abysmal, dreadful Venom sequel, Let There Be Carnage, dribbled out not long before No Way Home was released, and disappointing spy caper The 355 limply failed to make much of an impression on anyone. Kenneth Branagh explores his childhood in Belfast, while Peter Dinklage takes on Cyrano. Elsewhere, Shang-Chi And The Legend Of The Ten Rings gives the MCU itās first Asian lead (and itās a pretty great movie into the bargain), and Daniel Craig gets his last Bond outing in the surprisingly good No Time To Die. For fans of pointless franchise extensions, thereās Ghostbusters: Afterlife, The Addams Family 2 and Space Jam: A New Legacy. Oh, and Resident Evil. And Scream. And F9: The Fast Saga. And The Matrix: Resurrections. Oh well at least a dinosaur got to punch a monkey in Godzilla v Kong. Rankings: 1. Into The Spider-Verse2. Spider-Man: No Way Home3. Spider-Man 24. Spider-Man: Homecoming5. The Amazing Spider-Man 26. Spider-Man7. Spider-Man: Far From Home8. The Amazing Spider-Man9. Spider-Man 3
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Feb 14, 2022 13:26:18 GMT -5
I had complicated feelings about this one, which also might change upon repeat viewings.
Molina and Dafoe were excellent, easily the best parts of the movie. They massively overshadowed the other returning villains, even Jamie Foxx's new buff Electro who's main job was to be a conduit (heh) for dumping on ASM2.
It was a pretty good take on the Sinister Six Five. Not everybody can have enough to do, that's just the way it goes. Certainly not in a movie as stuffed as this. As such, Michael Keaton's Vulture still had the best solo act. And I'm disappointed that Michael Mando never got to come back from Homecoming with a super suit as the Scorpion.
The mirror dimension was the best action sequence, and of course "You know what's cooler than magic? Math!" is a great line. Strange may have been beaten a little easily, but these things are often popularity contests. Plus this is a Spider-Man who's gotten to be a darn good fighter, as we saw in the growth with Far From Home.
I felt like the pacing ground to an utter halt when the other Spiders-Man came on screen. Just a complete stop.
I'm not surprised that Garfield was good at being a fun Spider-Man. That was always the case.
I hope you're happy, Very Online nerds! Now MCU Peter Parker is poor and miserable and unfulfilled, just like you and certain Marvel writers always wanted. The movie didn't go super grimdark, which is good. But even so, this felt like a response to fans; when Peter keeps the Lego Emperor from Homecoming, I immediately thought it could be referencing the backlash that led to the Star Wars 9 ending.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rumak on Feb 26, 2022 19:47:41 GMT -5
OK, I finally saw No Way Home. I feel like we need to discuss who the actual villain of the film is. I refer, of course, to Stephen Strange.
First, a teenager comes to him with a problem, and his first instinct is to cast a magic spell that might affect basically everyone in the universe (and maybe even people from other ones)? Next, he fails to explain the consequences of the spell, and then when casting a spell that apparently requires intense concentration to prevent possible screwing with the multi-verse, he allows that teenager to be in the room with him. And then he's got the nerve to chastise the kid for not thinking of something else first? Strange, you are the adult in that situation!
And then finally, we need to press the button on the box to save the multiverse, even if we know its going to kill these five people in the room. That's some Thanos-light shit right there. You cannot blame fate, when you are the one responsible for those people being there outside of their own universes. You break it, you bought it, Stephen.
And then I'm not sure how or why the spell went from everyone forgetting that Spiderman was Peter Parker to everyone simply forgetting who Peter Parker is, but now Strange doesn't even have to live with the fact that he helped trigger May's death, because he doesn't get to remember any of it. Convenient, that is.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Mar 8, 2022 19:27:47 GMT -5
OK, I finally saw No Way Home. I feel like we need to discuss who the actual villain of the film is. I refer, of course, to Stephen Strange. First, a teenager comes to him with a problem, and his first instinct is to cast a magic spell that might affect basically everyone in the universe (and maybe even people from other ones)? Next, he fails to explain the consequences of the spell, and then when casting a spell that apparently requires intense concentration to prevent possible screwing with the multi-verse, he allows that teenager to be in the room with him. And then he's got the nerve to chastise the kid for not thinking of something else first? Strange, you are the adult in that situation! And then finally, we need to press the button on the box to save the multiverse, even if we know its going to kill these five people in the room. That's some Thanos-light shit right there. You cannot blame fate, when you are the one responsible for those people being there outside of their own universes. You break it, you bought it, Stephen. And then I'm not sure how or why the spell went from everyone forgetting that Spiderman was Peter Parker to everyone simply forgetting who Peter Parker is, but now Strange doesn't even have to live with the fact that he helped trigger May's death, because he doesn't get to remember any of it. Convenient, that is. Based on the trailer I saw for the upcoming Dr Strange movie, it kinda seems like people in the Marvel universe also think Strange fucked everything up and maybe are punishing him?
|
|
|
Post by [Citrus] on Apr 10, 2022 21:12:04 GMT -5
I'm mainlining Spider Man - Amazing 2 to modern day - because I'm going to Dr. Strange and since it's Marvel you can't watch a movie without having taken a three week correspondence course. So far, between ones I've watched before and all the new ones (except for No Way Home since I'm not there yet):
I don't like Spider Man 2 as much as a lot of people. I like Amazing Spider Man 2 more than a lot of people. Somehow this washes out to liking them roughly the same amount. Into the Spider Verse is the best, Amazing Spider Man is the worst.
|
|