|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 21, 2015 18:15:37 GMT -5
He's had some involvement and will be an executive producer in the next one, but the impression one gets from interviews is he was more than willing to add bits in is movie to set up ideas Rian Johnson had.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 19:12:45 GMT -5
I don't think Abrams has control like Lucas did. Abrams is a producer, but at this point Johnson might have more control. He isn't just directing VIII but writing it and IX as well. Though I can't imagine Abrams just drops out that much, he helped create the terriotry we are in now, how could anyone just walk away from that?
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 21, 2015 19:24:14 GMT -5
Abrams reportedly found it pretty exhausting, @matt1 - so walk away he did (wouldn't be surprised if they originally wanted him for the trilogy.) Ultimately the head honcho here is really Kathleen Kennedy, the Kevin Feige of the Star Wars universe; and the one who fought to while Abrams away from his Star Trek series.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 21, 2015 19:26:02 GMT -5
Abrams reportedly found it pretty exhausting, @matt1 - so walk away he did (wouldn't be surprised if they originally wanted him for the trilogy.) Ultimately the head honcho here is really Kathleen Kennedy, the Kevin Feige of the Star Wars universe; and the nerds over at Lucasfilm Story Group like Pablo Hidalgo and Leland Chee. Yup. I suspect the decisions are probably largely being reached via a creative committee, with Kennedy having ultimate veto power. One thing I'm very curious about is Lucas's original submission and the relationship it has with these films. Were his ideas thrown out entirely or just reframed and remixed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 19:26:11 GMT -5
I don't think Abrams has control like Lucas did. Abrams is a producer, but at this point Johnson might have more control. He isn't just directing VIII but writing it and IX as well. Though I can't imagine Abrams just drops out that much, he helped create the terriotry we are in now, how could anyone just walk away from that? Oh wow, so Rian Johnson wrote and directed Brick, The Brothers Bloom and Looper...and also directed three episodes of Breaking Bad? I'm pretty optimistic about the future SW films now.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 21, 2015 20:09:18 GMT -5
ABz B👹anaz Film - like Abrams, Johnson is only doing one. The third and final part of the trilogy is by Colin "Jurassic World" Trevorrow. Ben Grimm Lucas has talked about as if they threw out the whole thing, to the point he was talking about how he saw Star Wars as a soap opera about the Skywalker family and apparently they didn't or something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 21:16:50 GMT -5
WOOHOO! My wife got me IMAX 3D tickets for myself and my friend to see TFA on Saturday!
WOO!
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 21, 2015 21:24:36 GMT -5
Ben Grimm Lucas has talked about as if they threw out the whole thing, to the point he was talking about how he saw Star Wars as a soap opera about the Skywalker family and apparently they didn't or something. I saw he said that, but I could also see him seriously exaggerating how much they threw out.
|
|
|
Post by WKRP Jimmy Drop on Dec 21, 2015 22:21:43 GMT -5
Okay random thoughts after I have calmed my 8-year-old squealing shit down and had some fun reading the internet's reactions (not necessarily aimed at anyone on this board, just general reactions to other people's reactions):
IMO Rey is obviously Luke's child, if for no other reason than they played Luke's music behind her when she activated the light saber. (My alternate theory, though, is that she's actually a Skywalker clone, and no-one has any idea)
Kylo Ren isn't a Sith, because if he were, he would be a Darth. Darth is a Sith title.
I really don't understand the problem with him being named "Ben". Come on, y'all. He's the one who literally brought Han, Luke, and Leia together, and they never referred to him as "Obi-wan". Also "Jacen" is not a good space name.
Rey is as cute as a goddamn button. Also I'm 98% certain that she was 100% based on Kaylee from Firefly, especially as there was one bit that was a direct lift from one of Kaylee's lines.
Finn was also cute as a goddamn button. I really do like how he was pretty much constantly off-balance while still managing to dredge up his courage. And I desperately Do Not Want a romance with him and Rey. Just keep them as dorky bros!
There wasn't a whole lot to Poe Dameron, but I liked what we saw, and I'm sure we'll get more information on him in upcoming episodes. Also that's an attractive man, just sayin'.
LEIA! LEIA! LEIA! LEIA! MOAR LEIA
Leia is not a Jedi, people of the internet, because she doesn't want to be. She has other shit to do that is FAR more important to her. How hard is that to understand?
Dude, if we had droids like Star Wars droids, spies would be hiding shit in them and sending them off to their destinations all the damn time. It doesn't really bother me that it's a retread of hiding Death Star plans in R2.
Obviously I was permanently traumatised by Han dying, but it actually makes perfect sense in terms of the Star Wars narrative pattern. BUT I DON'T LIKE IT. I DON'T LIKE IT.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 21, 2015 22:33:39 GMT -5
There were a few things that I thought were very good. Poe, Finn, and Rey were all excellent. The characters were fun, well-conceived, and I really look forward to spending more time with them. Driver, I think will seem better on the second viewing; like I said, I didn't think the portrayal was working initially because I thought they were doing something different with it. The plot, though, was kind of terrible. While some of the "coincidences" in the first act probably weren't coincidences (for example, I think Han was actively looking for the Falcon on Jakku), there were so many of those in a row that it took me out of the film for a minute. There were a few too many bits that echoed the original trilogy, especially the first movie, and that got a little repetitive after a while. But there was a lot to like about the movie. I loved getting to see Luke and Leia and Han and Chewie and Admiral Ackbar again. The new characters were great, and I'm glad we get two more movies with them. The conflict is interesting, and I want to see it expanded. Okay, it's Monday, so no more spoiler tags from me. I, too, am looking forward to seeing the movie again. I really want to see how I will react to the characters now that I've already seen the film. I feel like Rey, Finn and Poe all have potential to be great characters. I am very excited to see how they develop in the next films. It is kind of crazy to realize that Poe and Rey haven't even met. Oh, and I also think Han was *looking* for the Falcon. And I did like how the opening scene with Poe through when BB-8 is rescued by Rey was an extended imitation of the original film's opening. This was such blatant imitation that I thought it came back around to being cheeky and fun. I felt like the imitation scenes got less and less fun as the film progressed. Yep. This is why the movie feels like it has no plot to me. Luke is the most important character in this movie, and he only has a 1 minute wordless scene. The crawl says he missing and characters are trying to find him, oh and that after he vanished the First Order grew stronger. And then Han tells us that Luke was trying to train Kylo Ren and failed. And the action in this movie mostly revolves around characters trying to pass info to the people who can use it to find Luke. So, basically everything that happens in the movie is about Luke. By the time he shows up on screen I am DYING to talk to him. Luke, um.... I have some questions. Please explain to me what the fuck happened here and, more importantly, what you're going to do to fix it. Thanks. Since that is likely going to take at least one entire film, they either had to start with this scene in this movie, or end with it. I really, really, really want to see the next movie now. I actually quite loved that R2D2 wasn't in most of the movie. I loved how they waved him off with "He's just not working!" Again, I loved that this stuff wasn't over-explained. "He doesn't work anymore" is good enough for me. R2D2 is FAR too valuable and important to have him be operational throughout this movie. There's no way he could have been in more of the movie without it being ridiculous. I mean, we saw it! The instant he turns on, it's like BOOM! PROBLEM SOLVED! That said, I do want to see more of R2D2 in the next movie. Because R2D2 is probably my favorite robot in the entirety of fiction.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 21, 2015 22:43:23 GMT -5
Okay with the releases of lore books and such turns out the planet Starkiller Base blew up wasn't Chandrila after all - it was Hosnian Prime. Apparently, the New Republic rotates the location of the Galactic Senate between planets, and that planet was just unfortunate enough to be the one the Senate was on at the time. I feel like Abrams wanted to blow up Coruscant - both because the planet was the embodiment of what he didn't want in his movie (very consciously set on the 'frontier', as he's said, and away from the 'middle-aged' concerns of the prelogy) and also because as Star Trek fans well know he's more than willing to detonate a well known planet for effect - but Abrams was presumably talked out of it by The Powers That Be who may want Coruscant around in the event they want to use a spectacularly huge city planet at some point in the future. Ah, yeah, that didn't look like Coruscant, so I was curious as to what planet it was. So, this information makes me even more baffled as to how blowing up this planet somehow puts an end to the New Republic and the Senate. I could understand how blowing up Coruscant would have a strong psychological impact. The history, institutional memory, Jedi temple, libraries, Senate building, other assorted historical buildings.... But, if it is just some random planet that happens to be hosting the Senate this week, then who really cares? I mean, in terms of taking down the Republic. Just elect new people and convene somewhere else. Maybe don't publicize where you are meeting next time, eh? Or don't even meet all in one physical place. Technology is your friend! Even if it had been Coruscant, I feel like they should be strongly motivated to regroup and reconvene. But, definitely, if the point was for the First order to strike a devastating blow, then the producers probably should have just let JJ blow up Coruscant. Yeah, that is the one with the connection to Anakin Skywalker. That is why Kylo Ren wanted it. I wonder if she'd have heard Obi-Wan Kenobi speaking to her if she'd picked up the green saber?
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 21, 2015 22:58:11 GMT -5
pairesta I figured Kylo Ren isn't really that high up in the structure of the Order. Domhnall Gleeson's character definitely seemed to outrank him. He was the one making all the military and tactical decisions. I figured the military people in the Order just put up with Kylo Ren because he's the apprentice of General Snoke. Also, I kind of wish we hadn't seen Snoke in this movie. I feel like we didn't really need to see the Big Baddie in this. The other characters make it very clear that Kylo Ren was corrupted to the Dark Side by this stronger Dark Side user. Han calls him out in that confrontation scene, saying Snoke is just using him. I feel like that would have been enough for this movie. Douay-Rheims-Challoner Wait, what? People think Rey is related to Obi-Wan Kenobi? I don't see how that's possible. She's too young. And I'm pretty sure Obi-Wan was celibate. (Though, that is tragic to think about considering how sexy Ewan McGregor is.) I just figured that Obi-Wan was calling out to her because he's connected to the Skywalker family. Hey, he lost a Skywalker to the Dark Side. Maybe he can help bring one back? Ha! Bring back Ewan McGregor! (Come on, please? He's so adorable.) If she's Luke's daughter, then wouldn't the film have to take time to explain who her mother was? Do we think these films are that concerned with backstory? If so, probably should have focused some of that energy on explaining Han's relationship to Kylo Ren so that there was some emotional power in that climax scene. Bah. I think she's either Luke's daughter or Han/Leia's. But, if she's Han and Leia's, then these scenes between Han and Rey seem fairly wasted. @matt1 You're looking at it the wrong way. Do you want this whiny, bratty Dark Side user to be named after Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi? I sure don't. Yeesh, Obi-Wan didn't screw up badly enough to deserve that. No, no. It is better that he gets the lame, bastardized name of Ben. Although, you never know, maybe if they had believed in him enough to call him Obi-Wan, then he wouldn't have turned out so bad!
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Dec 21, 2015 23:25:35 GMT -5
While I always hesitate to link to anything Devin Faraci writes, because he is a doofus, this summary of the relationship between the Republic, the Empire, the First Order, and the Resistance seems like it makes sense. The comments, on the other hand, are a wretched hive of "I think the story should have been [750 words of fan-fiction]!"
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 21, 2015 23:33:08 GMT -5
I don't see how that's possible. She's too young. And I'm pretty sure Obi-Wan was celibate. Kenobi got a little emotionally attached to Duchess Satine of Mandalore in the Clone Wars cartoon (which is still canon) but whether or not it went further than that is academic because she's subsequently murdered. It's true at this point for Rey to be Kenobi progeny she'd have to be the grandchild of a Kenobi we've never seen. Bit convoluted; although a good excuse to bring McGregor back were they so inclined. But yeah when you get down to it Rey is most clearly Luke's progeny - though that is the beginning and not the end of the mystery of Rey; because with whom Luke had a child and why Rey was taken from him remains unclear. But, if it is just some random planet that happens to be hosting the Senate this week, then who really cares? It is literally the entire government of the New Republic wiped out with a single stroke. Which, you know, is a good start for Starkiller Base's reign of galactic terror; the game plan presumably did not involve the Resistance blowing their world up before they could do further damage.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 21, 2015 23:37:26 GMT -5
While I always hesitate to link to anything Devin Faraci writes, because he is a doofus, this summary of the relationship between the Republic, the Empire, the First Order, and the Resistance seems like it makes sense. The comments, on the other hand, are a wretched hive of "I think the story should have been [750 words of fan-fiction]!" I'm definitely not reading the comments. I mean, that explanation makes sense, sort of. But.... doesn't the Republic even have a military? And by this point, it seems like the First Order is a pretty big deal. The New Republic STILL isn't dealing with it? It seems like Kylo Ren was corrupted a while ago. Long enough for Han and Leia to have apparently not seen each other for a while. Just.... really? They don't believe Leia that this is a problem and she goes off to form a Resistance group? So, after what happens in this movie, wouldn't everyone residing on all the rest of the Republic planets want to be in The Resistance? I guess this is bothering me more than I originally thought. Edited to add: And also, Faraci, that planet that was blown up did not look anything like Coruscant. Come on, it has been since the Episode III theatrical run that I have seen any of the prequels, and I didn't watch Clone Wars. And that planet was very clearly not Coruscant. Oh! And my final thought generated from this thread tonight: I really hope Snoke is not Darth Plagueis. I love the scene in Episode III where Palpatine tells that story. Moreso, I love McDiarmid's delivery and the implication that he is confessing to be a Sith who murdered his legendary Sith Lord master. This is really the only scene I completely love in the entire prequel trilogy. Please, new movies, don't take that away from me. It is way cooler if Palpatine is confessing to murdering a Sith Lord in this scene.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 21, 2015 23:39:52 GMT -5
Desert Dweller Reading up on it, apparently the New Republic Starfleet was also stationed at Hosnian Prime when it blew up; and they had substantially disarmed following the victory at Jakku in the belief the war was essentially over (and those that didn't think so were presumably those covertly backing the Resistance.)
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 21, 2015 23:48:25 GMT -5
Desert Dweller Reading up on it, apparently the New Republic Starfleet was also stationed at Hosnian Prime when it blew up; and they had substantially disarmed following the victory at Jakku in the belief the war was essentially over (and those that didn't think so were presumably those covertly backing the Resistance.) The ENTIRE military was stationed at one planet. And they had been doing nothing while this massive army was built up right next to them? So, what you're saying is that everything associated with the New Republic was moronic and deserved to be blown up. Are we blaming this on Luke, too?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 23:50:41 GMT -5
I just want a name that makes sense. Han and leia cant be that lame in naming their child. Also I just generally hate the cliche of fictional characters naming their children after other characters they come in contact with.
|
|
|
Post by ComradePig on Dec 21, 2015 23:57:57 GMT -5
I have returned, and largely enjoyed myself.
What I liked: -Fun Characters with charisma! Actual jokes that made me laugh or at least smile! A general sense of adventure and discovery!
-Kylo Ren worked for me, when the trailers initially showed up I was concerned that this movie was going to fall into the prequel trap of making Darth Vader the be all, end all of the universe even though in the original movies he was an important character but not the top dog within the Empire, but it makes sense for Ren individually to idolize him. Further, he's simply one villain among several and he and Domhall Gleeson's Hux jockeying for favor and tactical decisions was a nice dynamic. Ren is still a potent villain but also a little pathetic with the obvious distrust shown towards him by his supposed mentor and his frequent outbursts.
-The most effective action scene of the movie was for me the climactic Finn/Rey/Kylo lightsaber fight. It's also one of the film's most simple sequences in a lot of ways, the snowy forest was aesthetically pleasing but also not imbued with any wild and superfluous shit going on, and the fight itself displayed a nice sense of physicality and the nature of action reflected the character's mentality and background.
-It was visually pleasing movie. Particularly after the cinematic beige of the prequels where it felt like every damn shot was the same thing over and over, here there was actual attention paid to the cinematography, some shots like many of those of Jakku were both atmospheric and simply looked great, others like the shot with Leia and Rey separated from the crowd at the end were nice visual illustrations of character moments. Film is visual medium, it actually takes advantage of that again.
-Used the old characters the right way by giving them an actual role to play in the story, everything with Han and Leia was handled with tact and a proper degree of restraint. Han's death scene was excellently done, both visually and in terms of the character dynamics at play. I thought about Crystal Skull a bit while watching this, which roped Marion back into Indy for little to no reason and promptly gave her nothing to do.
What I was less keen on:
-Did we really need to do another death star? When I first found out about this plot element I was rather less than enthused and it continued to not work for me while watching the movie. I understand wanting the raise the stakes of the story, but those stakes were high enough for our characters without having to kill a bajillion people and wipe out like five planets, and weirdly no one seems that fazed that the Republic that everyone spent a decade fighting to create just got totally obliterated. When Alderan got destroyed in A New Hope, it was treated with the proper gravity for destruction on such a scale.
I understand the Republic is having its own issues but you'd think the Republic Army/Navy or whatever would be like "hey that giant fucking doom laser that makes the previous death stars look like child's play might be bad news". I appreciated that said doom laser was at least built into a planet, which made its existence more palatable to me since it at least seemed within the capabilities of the First Order, whereas some sort of "super-giant death star" would have set off all my stupid plotting alarms. Still I think the movie would be better if ol' doom laser of destruction was axed.
-Given that all the Order stormtroopers were basically child soldiers raised into a rigidly conformist, militaristic society it seemed odd to me that Captain Phasma, who one would presume must be pretty badass to get chrome armor, an actual name and a cape, promptly agreed to shut down the shields which totally doomed the base rather than just killing herself or something.
-There was something slightly intangible in the first half of the movie that made some of the action sequences feel a little weightless to me, I can't put my finger quite on what it was and it didn't really have to do with CGI usage or anything of that nature but maybe more pacing and framing. I think this feeling was slightly exacerbated by being seated near the very rear of the theater however, as it tends to pull me out somewhat as I've experienced with other movies and is not unique to this one.
|
|
|
Post by Return of the Thin Olive Duke on Dec 22, 2015 12:12:41 GMT -5
Okay, some context I found via Wookieepedia:
A year after the Battle of Endor, the remainder of the Imperial fleet was destroyed at Jakku. The Empire sued for peace and the galaxy was largely divided between the remnant empire and the New Republic. The Resistance was created independently to keep fighting the Empire, and was finally supported by the Republic when the First Order got serious. The end.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Dec 22, 2015 19:08:37 GMT -5
My problem with it being Plagueis is that it means it's just the goddamn Sith again. The idea of a functionally unrelated Sith was a lot more appealing to me.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Dec 22, 2015 20:09:12 GMT -5
I just want a name that makes sense. Han and leia cant be that lame in naming their child. Also I just generally hate the cliche of fictional characters naming their children after other characters they come in contact with. Not even the totally natural-sounding Albus Severus Potter?
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Dec 22, 2015 22:00:45 GMT -5
-Given that all the Order stormtroopers were basically child soldiers raised into a rigidly conformist, militaristic society it seemed odd to me that Captain Phasma, who one would presume must be pretty badass to get chrome armor, an actual name and a cape, promptly agreed to shut down the shields which totally doomed the base rather than just killing herself or something. I think it would be amusing if we find out in Episode 8 she actually was crushed to death in that trash compactor. Sorry everyone who dressed as Phasma for Halloween, your hero died inside a dumpster. Anyway, I don't know if anyone has made this observation yet, but I thought Kylo Ren was basically the personification of the whole movie: he's a reiteration of an original product that's neurotically obsessed with whether he's as good as the example he's copied from. He's good enough, which is kind of my feeling on the movie as a whole. I thought it was decently entertaining, though its kind of interesting to see the Marvel blockbuster formula being used for something with no superheroes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2015 0:45:13 GMT -5
I just want a name that makes sense. Han and leia cant be that lame in naming their child. Also I just generally hate the cliche of fictional characters naming their children after other characters they come in contact with. Not even the totally natural-sounding Albus Severus Potter?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2015 0:49:25 GMT -5
Okay, some context I found via Wookieepedia: A year after the Battle of Endor, the remainder of the Imperial fleet was destroyed at Jakku. The Empire sued for peace and the galaxy was largely divided between the remnant empire and the New Republic. The Resistance was created independently to keep fighting the Empire, and was finally supported by the Republic when the First Order got serious. The end. Wait...... what? The New Republic is stupid as fuck if they couldn't bribe whatever judge got that case. "So the empire that has committed many atrocities, including blowing up an entire PLANET wants to lay claim to a huge chunk of the galaxy, even while no longer having a fleet?" ...... "Yes". Deal.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Dec 23, 2015 1:35:18 GMT -5
Stray thoughts:
Good time overall. Yes there was a lot of re-tread and callback, but I was okay with at least 75% of it.
Fine, BB-8. Your cutesy ways won me over.
I would also rather not have a romance between Finn the Human and Rey.
When Rey's ability began to come out, it all seemed just a bit too strong. Or maybe Kylo Ren wasn't badass enough? Anyway, he consistently struggled against a new-to-the-force-user and a non-force-user. They have him do a lot of Ep IV Vader stuff, but Vader wouldn't have gotten beaten up like that. This is explained at the end by saying that his training is not complete (and he doesn't have the Darth title), which is fine, but they should have said that earlier.
Adam Driver did a really excellent job. Take notes, Hayden Christenson, that is how you do angst. (Also, going by n = 2 it is clear that young adult angst is what leads to the Dark Side).
Gosh, I thought Carrie Fisher was terrible. She didn't have a whole lot to do, but she didn't do much with it, either. This distresses me.
I wish we had gotten to see Gwendolyn Christie's face.
I'm usually pretty good at suspending disbelief, but the time tracking in the movie really started to get to me: - About 15 minutes lapsed between, "It will be charged in two minutes!" and "It will be charged in 30 seconds!". Just a bit extreme there. - Rey and Finn the Human were right there to get on board the Falcon, but how did the baddies find Kylo Ren in the snowy woods to get him off-planet in 30 seconds? - Rey found Luke just a little too quickly; it wasn't cute and circumstantial like with Yoda.
Han Solo was always going to be mostly dead, but he wasn't 100% dead until he yelled "Ben!"
I never would have noticed the utterance of "hell no!" if @matt1 hadn't pointed it out.
It was smart to leave R2 out of the bulk of the movie, but it was ridiculous to just have the map in his memory banks for no reason.
These typed thoughts might be mostly negative, but what's the internet for? I really did like the movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2015 1:58:21 GMT -5
- About 15 minutes lapsed between, "It will be charged in two minutes!" and "It will be charged in 30 seconds!". Just a bit extreme there. - Rey and Finn the Human were right there to get on board the Falcon, but how did the baddies find Kylo Ren in the snowy woods to get him off-planet in 30 seconds? I wish films were better about time constraints like that. I'm kinda counting down a clock in my head whenever they say stuff like that. It isn't a big deal because usually there is cool action, but it is a very lazy way of writing in tension. Not to mention like you said, it was about 10 to 15 minutes that passed. There was no fucking way it was remotely close to two minutes, this was one of the worst examples of this trope.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Dec 23, 2015 2:12:31 GMT -5
I'm usually pretty good at suspending disbelief, but the time tracking in the movie really started to get to me: - About 15 minutes lapsed between, "It will be charged in two minutes!" and "It will be charged in 30 seconds!". Just a bit extreme there. OMG, this hugely bothered me in the movie. I mean, come on, at least try to make it close! "It will be charged in 10 minutes!" would have been passable. When they say they have 30 seconds left, I couldn't help but think, "Didn't you have 2 minutes left about 20 minutes ago?" I also didn't like how strong Rey was so fast. I felt that really screwed with the established universe. But, I'm hoping that will get fixed in the next movie. Related.... it felt kind of terrible to say, but as we left, I said to my friend, "It would have been better if Kylo Ren had killed Finn at the end of the movie". At least for story purposes. I liked Finn and I liked John Boyega's performance. But, the final action scene made Ren look kind of silly. I'm going to try to go back to see the movie again tomorrow night, though the lines for the PLF screen I like are still incredibly long. We'll see... I am interested to see how the characters will feel to me on a second viewing. I also really want to see the entire opening sequence through when Rey and Finn take off in the Millennium Falcon again. Oh, and BTW, I *loved* the introduction of the Millennium Falcon. That was perfect. I also loved it when the audience cheered for the reveal of Falcon, just as much as for any of the actual original characters. Also, I still want the Lego Millennium Falcon set. Anyone want to gift me with $150? I really wish Episode VIII was coming out sooner. I am quite interested to see how the new characters are developed. And I think that despite the messy plot elements in this one, this movie helped set up a potentially great story for the next two movies.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Dec 23, 2015 10:45:18 GMT -5
Lifemate and I were up until 2 in the damn morning discussing what I noted above, as well as other points. Why is this inviting so much analysis from me, who was enthusiastic but not crazy gung-ho in advance? I don't do this with other movies.
I don't blame J.J. Abrams for wanting to get away from this. I even have some George Lucas sympathy.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Dec 23, 2015 12:15:10 GMT -5
Related.... it felt kind of terrible to say, but as we left, I said to my friend, "It would have been better if Kylo Ren had killed Finn at the end of the movie". At least for story purposes. I liked Finn and I liked John Boyega's performance. But, the final action scene made Ren look kind of silly. I don't think that's unintentional. The movie presents Kylo Ren as someone who is on a learning curve, just like the heroes are; he's notably not really much better at lightsaber battling than Rey - after a prequel trilogy of pros, we had two desperate amateurs slashing at each other. He's made great strides in his embrace of the dark side when he killed his father, but he's got a long way to go yet (hence how he ends the movie being recalled by Snoke to finish his training.) I suspect when Kylo Ren next crosses blades, he'll be a lot more dangerous than he was here. But then; so will she. Why is this inviting so much analysis from me, who was enthusiastic but not crazy gung-ho in advance? I don't do this with other movies. It's Star Wars. I've spent years dissecting the prequels. One could compare those films to another series of operatic spectaculars with Natalie Portman as the girlfriend, Marvel's Thor movies; but I watched both of those this year and have forgotten most of them already.
|
|