Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2017 0:07:36 GMT -5
Yeah, going by this (admittedly blurry) pic, I'm not on board with this yet. This just seems like a weird change for change's sake. Especially with the whole "it's in the prime universe not too many years before TOS" thing, making the Klingons looks *radically* different with these weird elongated hairless heads and those icky spines and such just seems like a really strange thing to do. I didn't like the STD Klingon design either, but even that wasn't this weird.
(Also weird: those new Klingon uniforms.)
I honestly could be wrong, and maybe within the show this works. But going from that photo, I'm just confused. I just can't get away from "this is a WEIRD decision."
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Feb 14, 2017 1:12:44 GMT -5
I hate it. If you're going to put Klingons in the show, make them look like Klingons. But what if the Borg also showed up at some point, and they also got a minor redesign, and they looked like this now? Would that fix Discovery's misstep re: Klingons, in your opinion? Well, it wouldn't fix that stupid Klingon BS design. But, I'd be more okay with this one. Since the look of the Borg is no doubt determined by what they have assimilated up to that point. Who's to say what they looked like 100 years ago?!
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Feb 14, 2017 3:30:43 GMT -5
So Discovery's had some new cast additions. One of them is Maulik Pancholy, aka 30 Rock's Jonathan. He's playing Doctor Nembue, the CMO of the Shenzhou, the ship captained by Michelle Yeoh. One of the others other person cast is also in the Shenzhou's crew - Sam Vartholomeos, as an Ensign Connor. The third is Terry Serpico, who is playing Admiral Anderson. I don't really know him, but YouTube's got a compilation of Serpico roles, so watch this and assume he's playing yet another hardass Starfleet Admiral (seems he's well suited.)
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Feb 14, 2017 11:57:01 GMT -5
But what if the Borg also showed up at some point, and they also got a minor redesign, and they looked like this now? Would that fix Discovery's misstep re: Klingons, in your opinion? Well, it wouldn't fix that stupid Klingon BS design. But, I'd be more okay with this one. Since the look of the Borg is no doubt determined by what they have assimilated up to that point. Who's to say what they looked like 100 years ago?! Probably much the same, considering the First Contact Borg that Archer & co sent back to the Delta Quadrant in Enterprise.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Feb 14, 2017 23:32:52 GMT -5
Jonathan! On Star Trek! Woooo!
Seem to be solid cast additions. If the show is called ST: Discovery how come none of the characters are actually on the Discovery?
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Feb 17, 2017 6:34:54 GMT -5
If the show is called ST: Discovery how come none of the characters are actually on the Discovery? Memory Alpha lists the three actors cast as Discovery crew - Sonequa Martin-Green, Anthony Rapp and Doug Jones - as well as James Frain, the guy who plays Sarek, as the series regulars. Everyone else, including the three actors cast on the Shenzhou and the three Klingon actors, and an actress playing a conn officer (not confirmed of which ship) - are listed as recurring. I'd take that with a grain of salt for now, but it's interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Feb 18, 2017 17:03:45 GMT -5
I haven't seen Doug Jones's character listed as being on the Discovery. The press release just names him "A Starfleet science officer". Rapp's character was specifically mentioned in that same press release as being on the Discovery.
In all the press releases I've only seen Martin-Green and Rapp specifically mentioned as playing officers on the Discovery.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Feb 24, 2017 14:12:50 GMT -5
sarapen’s remark about the future of SF in the TRAPPIST thread, I actually think the look of the Klingons is a symptom of the fact that classic space opera’s probably going to go the way of “invaders from Mars or Venus” in the next few decades. Audiences, especially audiences that keep at least passing tabs on what’s going on in science news, know that any intelligent life beyond Earth is not going to look lifelike. So there’s a demand for stranger-looking aliens—Doug Jones’s likely character is part of that, but so is removing Klingons from the old space Mongol/space Viking look. But these characters are still going to act substantially human, have human motivations, and come from very Earthlike worlds. I think this is fine because Trek is a science fantasy, not hard SF, but it’s definitely positioned itself—and Trek fans position themselves—as being at the “hard” side of science fantasy, thus there’s stepped-up demand for alien-ness. A while back on TOC Alurin remarked that he’d prefer that the aliens-of-the-week on Trek revert to the TOS mold, with most aliens of the week just looking human. Even the amount of convergence necessarily even for the more elaborate aliens-of-the-week (beyond foreheads—thinking of someone like this) we saw on DS9 and Voyager was at fantasy levels (nice how smiling and frowning, vocal inflections, masculine and feminine gender identities, etc. all lined up with humans). If your intent is to hold up a mirror to humanity, there’s no shame in using humans, and it doesn’t preclude having a Horta or condescending silicon microbes or exocomps or macroviruses or what have you for other sorts of stories.
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Feb 24, 2017 14:58:31 GMT -5
(nice how smiling and frowning, vocal inflections, masculine and feminine gender identities, etc. all lined up with humans). White, middle class, straight, American humans, you mean. Remember how Dr. Crusher freaked the shit out when her Trill boyfriend was reincarnated as a woman? Or how aliens live in nuclear families with mothers and fathers, instead of living with their mother and her brothers and not giving much of a crap about their biological fathers as actual human beings have done in real life? Or how the Voyager crew gaped like hayseeds when they time travelled to the 90s and saw a punk for the first time?
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 24, 2017 20:35:41 GMT -5
sarapen ’s remark about the future of SF in the TRAPPIST thread, I actually think the look of the Klingons is a symptom of the fact that classic space opera’s probably going to go the way of “invaders from Mars or Venus” in the next few decades. Audiences, especially audiences that keep at least passing tabs on what’s going on in science news, know that any intelligent life beyond Earth is not going to look lifelike. So there’s a demand for stranger-looking aliens—Doug Jones’s likely character is part of that, but so is removing Klingons from the old space Mongol/space Viking look. But these characters are still going to act substantially human, have human motivations, and come from very Earthlike worlds. I think this is fine because Trek is a science fantasy, not hard SF, but it’s definitely positioned itself—and Trek fans position themselves—as being at the “hard” side of science fantasy, thus there’s stepped-up demand for alien-ness. A while back on TOC Alurin remarked that he’d prefer that the aliens-of-the-week on Trek revert to the TOS mold, with most aliens of the week just looking human. Even the amount of convergence necessarily even for the more elaborate aliens-of-the-week (beyond foreheads—thinking of someone like this) we saw on DS9 and Voyager was at fantasy levels ( nice how smiling and frowning, vocal inflections, masculine and feminine gender identities, etc. all lined up with humans). If your intent is to hold up a mirror to humanity, there’s no shame in using humans, and it doesn’t preclude having a Horta or condescending silicon microbes or exocomps or macroviruses or what have you for other sorts of stories. What about that species from that random episode of Enterprise where there were like three biological sexes, and they were probably sexist against the one that wasn't male or female but honestly I don't remember because I just remember seeing like five minutes of the episode like 14 years ago? And does Star Trek really count as hard sci-fi? Also, shouldn't people really have known from the get-go with space opera that other intelligent life outside of earth almost certainly wouldn't look like humans? And surely a large part of the reason why so many TOS aliens were just humans in shitty cheap costumes was because of technical and budgetary limitations, right? And same for why so many TNG aliens just have weird foreheads or noses or hair or whatever? Also, presumably a reason why so many space opera characters are humanoid is also because that's what's easiest for audiences to identify with? Hence why in sci-fi, even in fictional universes with non-human-looking entities the main protagonist tends to be either human or one of the most human-looking characters? Like how Luke is the main character in Star Wars instead of Chewbacca or R2D2 or that laughing mouse thing from Jabba's Palace? Or like how even in something recent-ish with access to an enormous special effects budge like Guardians of the Galaxy the main character is Chris Pratt instead of Unrealistic Talking Raccoon, or Sentient Vin Diesel Tree or even that one Green (or Blue?) Skinned Alien Character?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2017 0:44:49 GMT -5
Im in full on "fuck disocvery" mode now. Also, really sad we are never going to get DS9 blu-ray, expected but sad.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Feb 26, 2017 15:15:08 GMT -5
Roy Batty's Pet Dove It obviously isn’t hard SF and people don’t expect it to be, but the tl:dr version of my point even within the realms of science-fantasy there are conventions that have become out-of-date and I think those may end up encompassing a wider range of science fantasy—much as “within our solar system” space opera went away with the first planetary missions I think “within our galaxy” ones might be going in a few decades, too.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Feb 27, 2017 14:25:23 GMT -5
What about that species from that random episode of Enterprise where there were like three biological sexes, and they were probably sexist against the one that wasn't male or female but honestly I don't remember because I just remember seeing like five minutes of the episode like 14 years ago? You can pretty much count on one hand the amount of humanoid species in Star Trek which don't conform to a gender binary. That and the species in "The Outcast" are the most notable examples (Trill are genderfluid only in the sense they can pass from one gender to the other when their slugs move from a host of one gender to another.)
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Feb 27, 2017 19:34:00 GMT -5
What about that species from that random episode of Enterprise where there were like three biological sexes, and they were probably sexist against the one that wasn't male or female but honestly I don't remember because I just remember seeing like five minutes of the episode like 14 years ago? You can pretty much count on one hand the amount of humanoid species in Star Trek which don't conform to a gender binary. That and the species in "The Outcast" are the most notable examples (Trill are genderfluid only in the sense they can pass from one gender to the other when their slugs move from a host of one gender to another.) I'm realizing now that the concept of the late-90s/early-00s children's book series Animorphs was basically just ripping off of whatever the Trill are, and also those shitty Season 1 TNG episodes where that dude's head explodes after he gets infected by some stop motion aliens.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 14:02:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Mar 7, 2017 22:01:50 GMT -5
SQUEEEEEEEE!!! I love Jason Isaacs. Love love love love. This is so exciting!
I wonder what the odds are on his character dying in the first episode?
Damn, I am really loving all the casting choices. I'm going to be so disappointed when/if CBS completely screws this up by making some shallow action show that bears no resemblance to Star Trek. Or worse, some shallow BORING show that bears no resemblance to Star Trek. I had a lot of hope when Bryan Fuller was in charge. Now, I'm kind of expecting it to be terrible. But damn, this is an excellent cast. I really hope it isn't terrible.
Also, I'm still not sure why there are 3 different ships in play, according to the casting notices.
Finally, I wonder what kind of ratings this has to get in order to get CBS to make more? I also wonder what it would take to get CBS to make a show set in the FUTURE, post-DS9 part of the timeline. That is the Trek I really want to see.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 22:16:06 GMT -5
SQUEEEEEEEE!!! I love Jason Isaacs. Love love love love. This is so exciting! I wonder what the odds are on his character dying in the first episode Likely? Idk, something tells me our lead that is not a captain will end up captain of the ship.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Mar 7, 2017 22:35:05 GMT -5
SQUEEEEEEEE!!! I love Jason Isaacs. Love love love love. This is so exciting! I wonder what the odds are on his character dying in the first episode Likely? Idk, something tells me our lead that is not a captain will end up captain of the ship. Yeah, that is what I figure. And Isaacs will be playing the Sean Bean-type role. Still, I am so excited to see him on Star Trek. I am trying to imagine what it would be like to have a new Trek show on air that I really like...... I'm not even sure I can. I'm trying to remind myself that TNG and DS9 were pretty weak in their first seasons, so maybe it won't matter if I don't love it right away?
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Mar 8, 2017 5:52:57 GMT -5
Likely? Idk, something tells me our lead that is not a captain will end up captain of the ship. Yeah, that is what I figure. And Isaacs will be playing the Sean Bean-type role. Still, I am so excited to see him on Star Trek. I am trying to imagine what it would be like to have a new Trek show on air that I really like...... I'm not even sure I can. I'm trying to remind myself that TNG and DS9 were pretty weak in their first seasons, so maybe it won't matter if I don't love it right away? The only Star Trek show to have a good first season was TOS.
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Mar 8, 2017 8:05:46 GMT -5
Yeah, that is what I figure. And Isaacs will be playing the Sean Bean-type role. Still, I am so excited to see him on Star Trek. I am trying to imagine what it would be like to have a new Trek show on air that I really like...... I'm not even sure I can. I'm trying to remind myself that TNG and DS9 were pretty weak in their first seasons, so maybe it won't matter if I don't love it right away? The only Star Trek show to have a good first season was TOS. Allamaraine! Allamaraine!
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Mar 8, 2017 22:48:04 GMT -5
The only Star Trek show to have a good first season was TOS. Allamaraine! Allamaraine! Ugh.... Um, at least "Duet" is good? That's all I got. I am really trying to remember how bad the first seasons are of most Trek shows. I want to be able to give Discovery a chance.
|
|
|
Post by rimjobflashmob on Mar 9, 2017 0:38:16 GMT -5
Allamaraine! Allamaraine! Ugh.... Um, at least "Duet" is good? That's all I got. I am really trying to remember how bad the first seasons are of most Trek shows. I want to be able to give Discovery a chance. "Duet" is a legit classic. I really, really like "Emissary" as well, and I have a soft spot for "Q-Less" because Vash is a BAMF and Sisko punches Q in the face. But yeah... it's slim pickings, TOS excluded. - TNG has "Conspiracy," which is absurdly off-tone but entertaining, and the Bynar episode is kind of okay? - I barely remember anything about season 1 of VOY except that "Faces" surprised me with its quality. - DS9 (see above) - ENT had a fairly solid opener in "Broken Bow," a great Jeffrey Combs showcase in "The Andorian Incident", and a neat little character study in "Shuttlepod One," but on the other hand, Temporal Cold War. Yeesh.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Mar 9, 2017 8:54:04 GMT -5
DS9 probably had the least bad first season of the post-TOS shows, having a couple of good episodes (Duet and In the Hands of the Prophets), but had some dire, dire, "We have no idea what we're doing" episodes, too. Part of the reason that I abandoned both Voyager and Enterprise in the middle of their second seasons is that they hadn't improved much on their terrible first seasons, whereas TNG and DS9 both improved massively in the second season, pretty much immediately.
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Mar 9, 2017 16:02:38 GMT -5
DS9 probably had the least bad first season of the post-TOS shows, having a couple of good episodes (Duet and In the Hands of the Prophets), but had some dire, dire, "We have no idea what we're doing" episodes, too. Part of the reason that I abandoned both Voyager and Enterprise in the middle of their second seasons is that they hadn't improved much on their terrible first seasons, whereas TNG and DS9 both improved massively in the second season, pretty much immediately. DS9's problem in the first season was mostly figuring out what kinds of stories it should tell. The shadow of being a TNG spinoff, and trying to replicate TNG's formula, is cast over most of the worst episodes of the season (like "If Wishes Were Horses," which even gives Sisko a freakout in an elevator similar to Picard's in "Where No One Has Gone Before.") After that season Michael Piller told the writers to focus on stories about DS9, ones they couldn't do on TNG - the sorts of episodes that were among the first season's best, as noted - and the overall quality started picking up.
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Mar 10, 2017 20:59:36 GMT -5
I heard Ira Steven Behr on the "Engage" podcast last week saying that Michael Piller at one point (S2? Before Piller left for Voyager) very seriously gave him the "bad" news that DS9 was never going to the "the franchise" show, like TNG and Voyager. Behr said (paraphrasing) he took this as great news because it meant they'd pay less attention to what he was doing. It was a nice anecdote.
I hope everyone donated to the DS9 Documentary crowdfunding campaign. Ira says they're going to use the money raised to meet the last stretch goal to remaster some DS9 clips in HD. I was very happy to see them blow past that stretch goal after that news was announced. (If it is still March 10th when you read this, you can still donate.)
I am incredibly curious to see what ST: Discovery will be like. I am hoping its first season isn't as weak as the other shows. Hoping they have a solid, compelling story to tell over the course of the season. I'm also intensely curious as to what the hell they're going to do with Sarek as a main character. That seems to like it is inevitably going to produce some major retcon. Hmmm....
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Mar 11, 2017 15:55:57 GMT -5
Desert Dweller Piller left DS9 after season two, which is also how long he stayed on Voyager - his last script for Star Trek television was Viyager's season three premiere. He remained a creative consultant on both shows, which mostly apparently meant he read screenplays ahead of time (he demanded the original draft of "Darkling," a season three Voyager script, be changed or he'd have his name taken off the show, for example.)
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Mar 15, 2017 23:40:25 GMT -5
I heard Ira Steven Behr on the "Engage" podcast last week saying that Michael Piller at one point (S2? Before Piller left for Voyager) very seriously gave him the "bad" news that DS9 was never going to the "the franchise" show, like TNG and Voyager. Behr said (paraphrasing) he took this as great news because it meant they'd pay less attention to what he was doing. It was a nice anecdote. I hope everyone donated to the DS9 Documentary crowdfunding campaign. Ira says they're going to use the money raised to meet the last stretch goal to remaster some DS9 clips in HD. I was very happy to see them blow past that stretch goal after that news was announced. (If it is still March 10th when you read this, you can still donate.) I am incredibly curious to see what ST: Discovery will be like. I am hoping its first season isn't as weak as the other shows. Hoping they have a solid, compelling story to tell over the course of the season. I'm also intensely curious as to what the hell they're going to do with Sarek as a main character. That seems to like it is inevitably going to produce some major retcon. Hmmm.... Piller, I think, really intended DS9 to be the Trek standard-bearer and see the same widespread popularity and commercial/critical success that TNG did (I have one of the TV Guides for DS9’s final episode—it was so refreshing to read the laudatory article in there, since being a DS9 fan at the time was essentially being on your own). And from what I remember reading about Voyager’s genesis Paramount wanted a very conservative, more-of-the-same type show. It evidently took a lot of convincing to let them strand the ship (“you have the ship going the wrong way!” was the common criticism at first) and Paramount even had them audition male actors for Janeway (I wouldn’t be surprised if they also had white actors read for Sisko).
|
|
|
Post by Douay-Rheims-Challoner on Mar 16, 2017 9:18:32 GMT -5
(I have one of the TV Guides for DS9’s final episode—it was so refreshing to read the laudatory article in there, since being a DS9 fan at the time was essentially being on your own). Well, unless you spent a lot of time online arguing about Star Trek, which I was doing at the time. DS9 had a very vocal online fandom (much like its perennial rival, Babylon 5 - and it was Niners who introduced me to that show to begin with.) They did! I know this because one of the white guys who auditioned for both Sisko and Janeway was the same guy - Gary Graham, who had previously been the lead on the cancelled FOX show Alien Nation and finally got a semi-notable Star Trek role as Ambassador Soval on Enterprise.
|
|
|
Post by Ben Grimm on Mar 16, 2017 9:42:22 GMT -5
(I wouldn’t be surprised if they also had white actors read for Sisko). Given that Siddig was originally brought in as a possible Sisko, they clearly were at least looking at a range of ethnicities.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Lemur on Mar 16, 2017 13:07:17 GMT -5
Ben Grimm They also did colorblind casting for TNG—I’m really interested in the Earth-2 TNG with Yaphet Kotto as Captain Jean-Luc Senghor, Julia Nickson (or Rosalind Chao!) as security chief Lt. Yang, Kevin Peter Hall as Data (and Dr. Noonien Soong), and Jenny Agutter as a British Dr. Crusher.
|
|