|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 27, 2021 7:23:36 GMT -5
I enjoyed it, but like the good Mr. Grimm, I've read the novel a number of times (and want to read it again now), and I realize that a lot of it is just place-setting, but I wanted more of it. What annoyed me the most is how they put the accent on a different syllable than where I heard it in my head (ARrakis, bene gesSERit, a couple others that I can't remember right now). Also they only called it "Dune" once, and it was the Baron calling it that for no reason at all except to say the name of the movie, and TBH calling the planet "Dune" is like calling our planet "Wave". I, too, pronounced it "AR-rakis", in my head, but I was prepared for "Ar-RAK-is" because I watched Lynch's adaptation like two days before Villeneuve's and that's how they pronounce it there. Although I haven't read the book multiple times, I think I had a similar reaction to you and Ben, in that I thought it was very well-made and I enjoyed it, but there was something that to me felt a little perfunctory about it, probably in large part because so much of Part One is set-up for Part Two (and, hopefully, if Villeneuve gets his way, Dune Messiah). Nevertheless, in spite of merely thinking "that was quite good," rather than "this is one of the best films I have ever seen," Villeneuve's film has made me even more enthusiastic about the Dune Chronicles in general. Like, I already planned on finishing at least Franklin Herbert's books (just a few pages into God Emperor at the moment), but I'll probably be revisiting at least the first couple again before Villeneuve gets around to releasing Part Two. Also, against my own better judgment, I think I'm going to at least make an attempt at reading the books by Dune's Son, although I'll probably check those out from the library rather than purchasing them new from the bookstore like I did with the Dune Chronicles proper.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 27, 2021 7:24:35 GMT -5
Rando, you have made a typo in this thread's title. As you can see below, the film is clearly titled Dunc (named of course for Duncan "Dunc" Idaho, the protagonist of the Frank Herbert book from which Dunc is derived). Please correct your error. Thank you for pointing this out, Rosa; the thread title has been fixed.
|
|
Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Oct 27, 2021 12:49:36 GMT -5
Rando, you have made a typo in this thread's title. As you can see below, the film is clearly titled Dunc (named of course for Duncan "Dunc" Idaho, the protagonist of the Frank Herbert book from which Dunc is derived). Please correct your error. Thank you for pointing this out, Rosa; the thread title has been fixed. Thank you for fixing the thread title, Rando.
|
|
ABz B👹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,992
Member is Online
|
Post by ABz B👹anaz on Oct 27, 2021 12:58:13 GMT -5
Thank you for pointing this out, Rosa; the thread title has been fixed. Thank you for fixing the thread title, Rando. Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Also, clearly this logo is also a secret code. U rotated 90° CCW, then 90° CW, then 180°, then 270° CW. A safe combination maybe?
|
|
Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Oct 27, 2021 13:34:11 GMT -5
Thank you for fixing the thread title, Rando. Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Also, clearly this logo is also a secret code. U rotated 90° CCW, then 90° CW, then 180°, then 270° CW. A safe combination maybe? I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA.
|
|
ABz B👹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,992
Member is Online
|
Post by ABz B👹anaz on Oct 27, 2021 14:15:04 GMT -5
Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Also, clearly this logo is also a secret code. U rotated 90° CCW, then 90° CW, then 180°, then 270° CW. A safe combination maybe? I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA. YES! I hope that one's successful enough to continue the saga with Part 2: IDSPISPOPD!
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Oct 27, 2021 14:29:29 GMT -5
Thank you for fixing the thread title, Rando. Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Thanks to all three of you for helping to bury that body last night. Now where'd I put my day planner with all my contacts? I swear I'd lose my head...
|
|
Crash Test Dumbass
AV Clubber
ffc what now
Posts: 7,058
Gender (additional): mostly snacks
|
Post by Crash Test Dumbass on Oct 27, 2021 15:38:30 GMT -5
Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Also, clearly this logo is also a secret code. U rotated 90° CCW, then 90° CW, then 180°, then 270° CW. A safe combination maybe? I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA. I think there's enough material in there for 30 more movies.
|
|
LazBro
Prolific Poster
Posts: 10,280
|
Post by LazBro on Oct 27, 2021 16:36:37 GMT -5
Thank you both for doing this. I was concerned. Also, clearly this logo is also a secret code. U rotated 90° CCW, then 90° CW, then 180°, then 270° CW. A safe combination maybe? I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA. I know this is a niche thread, so it's only going to get what it gets, but this comment deserves every available like on the forum. So like... 12?
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Oct 28, 2021 0:23:54 GMT -5
I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA. I know this is a niche thread, so it's only going to get what it gets, but this comment deserves every available like on the forum. So like... 12? There are dozen of us! Dozen!
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Oct 28, 2021 1:30:45 GMT -5
I think the underdevelopment of Yueh was the weakest part of the adaptation, yeah. A change I did like was them just casually dropping that Guild Navigators use spice for interstellar travel. In the book I'm pretty sure this is a revelation dropped during one of Paul's prescient visions most of the way through the book, but just admitting it right off makes way more sense and is less complicated. What is everyone's opinion of the Harkonnens' pet dog or whatever? This was a bit frustrating. They say that interstellar travel depends on spice, but Kynes says that the Harkonnen discovered spice on Arrakis 80 years ago. So, either there are other sources of spice, or there are other things that enable interstellar travel. And there's no way those holotraining things work without computers, so why even bother with Mentats? Still, enjoyed it, and want to see it again in IMAX.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Oct 28, 2021 1:45:14 GMT -5
I enjoyed it, but like the good Mr. Grimm, I've read the novel a number of times (and want to read it again now), and I realize that a lot of it is just place-setting, but I wanted more of it. What annoyed me the most is how they put the accent on a different syllable than where I heard it in my head (ARrakis, bene gesSERit, a couple others that I can't remember right now). Also they only called it "Dune" once, and it was the Baron calling it that for no reason at all except to say the name of the movie, and TBH calling the planet "Dune" is like calling our planet "Wave". I thought Arrakis was one of the al-fnord stellar bodies (al-deberan, al-tair, al-gol, etc.) and that the r-l sounds merged, so it would be pronounced similarly, emphasizing the second syllable. Apparently, the planet Arrakis orbits Canopus, and not the star al-rakis (μ Draconis)
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 28, 2021 7:52:10 GMT -5
I think the underdevelopment of Yueh was the weakest part of the adaptation, yeah. A change I did like was them just casually dropping that Guild Navigators use spice for interstellar travel. In the book I'm pretty sure this is a revelation dropped during one of Paul's prescient visions most of the way through the book, but just admitting it right off makes way more sense and is less complicated. What is everyone's opinion of the Harkonnens' pet dog or whatever? This was a bit frustrating. They say that interstellar travel depends on spice, but Kynes says that the Harkonnen discovered spice on Arrakis 80 years ago. So, either there are other sources of spice, or there are other things that enable interstellar travel. And there's no way those holotraining things work without computers, so why even bother with Mentats? Still, enjoyed it, and want to see it again in IMAX. OK, I missed that. Given the time scales on which stuff happens in the Dune Chronicles, it doesn't make sense for spice to be a thing which has only existed for 80 years. It should be hundreds of years at least, if not millennia. Indeed, it would be absurd to argue that the spice was unknown to any but the Fremen prior to 80 years ago, given that the Bene Gesserit have been using the Water of Life for at least centuries if not millennia. I suppose it's possible that the Bene Gesserit and Guild both had secret deals with the Fremen ages ago, and then the Harkonnens figured out about spice and started selling it then, and this was when it began to just be used recreationally by random citizens of the empire as an addictive substance? This does bring up a question I've had about the Dune Chronicles in general, though. If interstellar travel is literally impossible without the spice, then how was Arrakis ever discovered (unless Arrakis is the earth thousands of years in the future)? This implies that surely there must have been some interstellar travel prior to the advent of spice. I suspect therefore that the spice must be what enables quick and safe interstellar travel. Maybe beforehand interstellar travel was enormously dangerous and took years. Perhaps it's a bit like the highway system in the modern US. You could travel by car, even cross country, before the highway system, but it took much longer and was much more inconvenient, and if the highway system were to somehow just magically disappear tomorrow, the reliance on this infrastructure is so great that the results would be absolutely catastrophic. But all the same, if the spice was first used to aid space travel 80 years ago, it can't have taken too long or been too dangerous to travel between solar systems, otherwise you couldn't have had emperors of the galaxy the same way you couldn't have realistically had a British Empire ruling over large portions of the globe with Medieval technology. Post Dune spoilers lie ahead for anyone who doesn't want to know what happens after the first book. Another thing about the Dune Chronicles that feels like it's happening on too compressed a time scale is the Fremen's holy war after Paul becomes Emperor. Like, there are millions of Fremen, and presumably they add many non-Fremen soldiers to their ranks as they conquer the galaxy, but in just twelve years they have killed 62 billion people and conquered hundreds of planets, which is a little hard to believe. Harder still to believe is that Paul's palace in Arrakeen (which I believe is said to be larger than a major city) has been built in under twelve years.
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Oct 28, 2021 8:15:14 GMT -5
This was a bit frustrating. They say that interstellar travel depends on spice, but Kynes says that the Harkonnen discovered spice on Arrakis 80 years ago. So, either there are other sources of spice, or there are other things that enable interstellar travel. And there's no way those holotraining things work without computers, so why even bother with Mentats? Still, enjoyed it, and want to see it again in IMAX. OK, I missed that. Given the time scales on which stuff happens in the Dune Chronicles, it doesn't make sense for spice to be a thing which has only existed for 80 years. It should be hundreds of years at least, if not millennia. Indeed, it would be absurd to argue that the spice was unknown to any but the Fremen prior to 80 years ago, given that the Bene Gesserit have been using the Water of Life for at least centuries if not millennia. I suppose it's possible that the Bene Gesserit and Guild both had secret deals with the Fremen ages ago, and then the Harkonnens figured out about spice and started selling it then, and this was when it began to just be used recreationally by random citizens of the empire as an addictive substance? This does bring up a question I've had about the Dune Chronicles in general, though. If interstellar travel is literally impossible without the spice, then how was Arrakis ever discovered (unless Arrakis is the earth thousands of years in the future)? This implies that surely there must have been some interstellar travel prior to the advent of spice. I suspect therefore that the spice must be what enables quick and safe interstellar travel. Maybe beforehand interstellar travel was enormously dangerous and took years. Perhaps it's a bit like the highway system in the modern US. You could travel by car, even cross country, before the highway system, but it took much longer and was much more inconvenient, and if the highway system were to somehow just magically disappear tomorrow, the reliance on this infrastructure is so great that the results would be absolutely catastrophic. But all the same, if the spice was first used to aid space travel 80 years ago, it can't have taken too long or been too dangerous to travel between solar systems, otherwise you couldn't have had emperors of the galaxy the same way you couldn't have realistically had a British Empire ruling over large portions of the globe with Medieval technology. Post Dune spoilers lie ahead for anyone who doesn't want to know what happens after the first book. Another thing about the Dune Chronicles that feels like it's happening on too compressed a time scale is the Fremen's holy war after Paul becomes Emperor. Like, there are millions of Fremen, and presumably they add many non-Fremen soldiers to their ranks as they conquer the galaxy, but in just twelve years they have killed 62 billion people and conquered hundreds of planets, which is a little hard to believe. Harder still to believe is that Paul's palace in Arrakeen (which I believe is said to be larger than a major city) has been built in under twelve years. Been a while since I've read the books, but I thought spice is what made interstellar travel without the aid of advanced AI possible, in that it gives humans the precognitive abilities necessary to navigate warp space. So, pre-Butlerian Jihad people presumably just relied on computers to get around. Either way, that "spice was discovered 80 years ago" line doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy James on Oct 28, 2021 11:23:50 GMT -5
There's that trope where the white hero who has been learning to hunt or fight with a sword for like a five minute montage gets told he's now better at this than all the samurai or native Americans or whomever that have been practicing those skills their whole lives. One detail I liked about Dune: The Book was that the first time Paul summons and rides a worm, and is all "Look at me now, replacement father figure!", Stilgar tells him, "That was fuckin' bush league shit. You made a bunch of mistakes and you're lucky your dumb ass didn't get killed, I mean, literally every ten-year-old here can do this better than you." In the Lynch version, this is glossed over, with the impressed Fremen saying "Usul has called a big one! Again, it is the legend!" but I'm holding out hope that Benicio del Toro's Stilgar will be having none of that in Dune: The (new) Movie: Part Two.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 28, 2021 14:33:42 GMT -5
There's that trope where the white hero who has been learning to hunt or fight with a sword for like a five minute montage gets told he's now better at this than all the samurai or native Americans or whomever that have been practicing those skills their whole lives. One detail I liked about Dune: The Book was that the first time Paul summons and rides a worm, and is all "Look at me now, replacement father figure!", Stilgar tells him, "That was fuckin' bush league shit. You made a bunch of mistakes and you're lucky your dumb ass didn't get killed, I mean, literally every ten-year-old here can do this better than you." In the Lynch version, this is glossed over, with the impressed Fremen saying "Usul has called a big one! Again, it is the legend!" but I'm holding out hope that Benicio del Toro's Stilgar will be having none of that in Dune: The (new) Movie: Part Two.He almost certainly won't be, since Stilgar is played by the famous actor Javier Bardem and not the famous actor Benicio del Toro.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 28, 2021 21:09:57 GMT -5
Intriguing analysis
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dweller on Oct 29, 2021 0:02:44 GMT -5
I can't wait for Villeneuve's next sci-fi opus, UUDDLRLRBA. I know this is a niche thread, so it's only going to get what it gets, but this comment deserves every available like on the forum. So like... 12?
I haven't read the book or seen the movie. I only clicked open this thread to find out why the title was spelling it "dunc". But her comment made me laugh, so I added a like.
|
|
Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Oct 29, 2021 0:38:35 GMT -5
"Dunc is derivative of Star Wars" is an... interesting take.
|
|
patbat
TI Forumite
OK です か
Posts: 2,396
|
Post by patbat on Oct 29, 2021 7:53:40 GMT -5
Best scene in the movie IMO
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy James on Oct 29, 2021 8:11:38 GMT -5
He almost certainly won't be, since Stilgar is played by the famous actor Javier Bardem and not the famous actor Benicio del Toro. Great point, Rando.
|
|
|
Post by Powerthirteen on Oct 29, 2021 9:22:45 GMT -5
He almost certainly won't be, since Stilgar is played by the famous actor Javier Bardem and not the famous actor Benicio del Toro. Great point, Rando. I will admit I also thought it was Benicio del Toro the first time Stilgar showed up. You can cancel me now.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 29, 2021 9:28:24 GMT -5
" Dunc is derivative of Star Wars" is an... interesting take. OK, so that tweet was technically taking things slightly out of context, but all the same, it's a very lazy troll article that didn't really need to be written. I can get being irritated with the sudden popularity of Dune if it's not your thing (although I suspect that there's a pretty huge overlap between "people who are really annoyed with Dune being popular" and "LPET scolds"), but the article is very badly written clickbait. I particularly liked the part where the author took exception to calling Dune the SF LOTR on the basis that Tolkien (whom she likes) disliked Dune. Also the way that she considers the plot to be impenetrable, when...it's pretty straightforward, especially Villeneuve's film of the first half of the book.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 29, 2021 9:40:17 GMT -5
I will admit I also thought it was Benicio del Toro the first time Stilgar showed up. You can cancel me now. They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director?
|
|
ABz B👹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,992
Member is Online
|
Post by ABz B👹anaz on Oct 29, 2021 9:46:07 GMT -5
I will admit I also thought it was Benicio del Toro the first time Stilgar showed up. You can cancel me now. They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director? Yeah, Del Toro is very distinctive and doesn't look like anyone else except a TINY bit Brad Pitt. Now, the whole "Jeffrey Dean Morgan looks like Javier Bardem" is a MUCH closer match.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 29, 2021 9:51:38 GMT -5
They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director? Jeffrey Dean Morgan I don't know who that is.
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Oct 29, 2021 9:57:01 GMT -5
They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director? Yeah, Del Toro is very distinctive and doesn't look like anyone else except a TINY bit Brad Pitt. Now, the whole "Jeffrey Dean Morgan looks like Javier Bardem" is a MUCH closer match. Bardem/Morgan is one of the few times I've seen one of those "totally looks like!" graphics and thought "wait, that's not just the same actor twice?
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Oct 29, 2021 9:59:12 GMT -5
I will admit I also thought it was Benicio del Toro the first time Stilgar showed up. You can cancel me now. They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director? I'd say your low point was confusing Joe Russo for Mark Ruffalo.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Oct 29, 2021 10:12:04 GMT -5
They don't even look similar though. Why is it that whenever I point out that Chris Evans looks EXACTLY like Matthew Fox in the movie Snowpiercer, everyone is all like "No Rando, those guys look nothing alike what are you talking about," or "Rando, what do you mean you don't know who Jason Alexander is, how are you so bad at knowing who actors are," but then it's totally normal for people to constantly confuse the extremely distinctive looking-and-sounding Benicio del Toro with literally any other Hispanic actor or director? I'd say your low point was confusing Joe Russo for Mark Ruffalo. OK, I just looked them both up on www.wikipedia.org again and I cannot tell the difference between their photos. They look the exact same. They both have black hair that's going grey at the temples. They both have the same shaped head and face, they're both in their 50s. They're both wearing black shirts; they're both sitting in front of microphones at a panel event, etc.
|
|
|
Post by liebkartoffel on Oct 29, 2021 10:36:42 GMT -5
I'd say your low point was confusing Joe Russo for Mark Ruffalo. OK, I just looked them both up on www.wikipedia.org again and I cannot tell the difference between their photos. They look the exact same. They both have black hair that's going grey at the temples. They both have the same shaped head and face, they're both in their 50s. They're both wearing black shirts; they're both sitting in front of microphones at a panel event, etc. Yes, we're well aware of your feelings toward the Italian-American community, Rando.
|
|