Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Oct 29, 2021 11:38:33 GMT -5
Yeah, Del Toro is very distinctive and doesn't look like anyone else except a TINY bit Brad Pitt. Now, the whole "Jeffrey Dean Morgan looks like Javier Bardem" is a MUCH closer match. Bardem/Morgan is one of the few times I've seen one of those "totally looks like!" graphics and thought "wait, that's not just the same actor twice? That's totally Morgan twice. Bardem has that Dora the Explorer haircut that everyone was making fun of in 2007.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Nov 1, 2021 22:21:01 GMT -5
There's that trope where the white hero who has been learning to hunt or fight with a sword for like a five minute montage gets told he's now better at this than all the samurai or native Americans or whomever that have been practicing those skills their whole lives. One detail I liked about Dune: The Book was that the first time Paul summons and rides a worm, and is all "Look at me now, replacement father figure!", Stilgar tells him, "That was fuckin' bush league shit. You made a bunch of mistakes and you're lucky your dumb ass didn't get killed, I mean, literally every ten-year-old here can do this better than you." In the Lynch version, this is glossed over, with the impressed Fremen saying "Usul has called a big one! Again, it is the legend!" but I'm holding out hope that Benicio del Toro's Stilgar will be having none of that in Dune: The (new) Movie: Part Two. Dune at least establishes that Paul has been practicing knife fighting for 'most of his life' - he's always older in the movies (20ish) than the books (15), and that he has to unlearn some of the 'slow blade penetrates the shield' stuff that doesn't work where there are no shields. His prescience probably helps - he's seen the knife fight play out a few different ways in his visions before he encounters Jamis. Plus, he has all that Bene Gesserit training. And maybe Jamis is underestimating him? If he thinks Paul is trying to coast on 'fulfilling prophecies', and is a soft outworlder, he might not have expected Paul to be competent. And Paul's victory seemed to surprise both of them. Which doesn't make any of the white savior stuff any less BS, but you have to build on the trope before you subvert it, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Nov 1, 2021 22:23:58 GMT -5
I will admit I also thought it was Benicio del Toro the first time Stilgar showed up. You can cancel me now. To the greatest extent possible, I avoided learning anything about the movie ahead of time, so other than a handful of leads, I didn't know who all was in the cast, and was surprised that Bardem was Stilgar. I did not recognize him at all.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Nov 9, 2021 15:05:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Nov 12, 2021 23:49:08 GMT -5
The Baron wiping sweat in his first scene was 100% Fat Brando. I assume the creepy pet thing was some sort of HR Geiger easter egg from the Jodorowsky production.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Nov 13, 2021 0:03:36 GMT -5
Wifemate spent the first half waiting for the fireworks factory, while I thought that part was all rush rush rush and the pace wasn't right until the Harkonnens attack.
Lot of great actors in this ensemble and they just get underserved. Yueh is the most egregious but it's true of almost everybody. Except Duncan Idaho who is barely in the book. Some executive produced must've really loved Jason Momoa. Probably that sleaze Brian Herbert.
Mentats dont get explained at all. The whole plotline where everyone is suspicious of Jessica was dropped. Characters don't clumsily voiceover their thoughts like Lynch, they clumsily mumble their thoughts in the Fremen tongue. The Baron's portrayal as dark lord is really overdone.
But everything looks great. The thopters are outstanding. The knife fights are cool.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Nov 14, 2021 21:59:00 GMT -5
One other thing: if you're interested in a long (long) read I suggest The Fremen Mirage by Bret Devereaux. This is not about Dune per se but an exploration and deconstruction of the concept of brutal living conditions producing great warriors like the Fremen and Sardaukar.
Since Part II is going to be all about the battles of these great warriors you might find it interesting. Also the essay is just short enough to be read before Part II comes out.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Nov 14, 2021 23:27:11 GMT -5
Mentats dont get explained at all. The whole plotline where everyone is suspicious of Jessica was dropped. Characters don't clumsily voiceover their thoughts like Lynch, they clumsily mumble their thoughts in the Fremen tongue. The Baron's portrayal as dark lord is really overdone. Jessica mumblewhispering through the Litany Against Fear was a waste of Herbert's best (and possibly only good) writing. Especially since it's Paul who uses it in the book during the same scene, where it makes more sense. I guess in the movie, showing his prescience was more important than demonstrating his self-possession at that point? Have I said that they should have gone the Lawrence route for this? 4 hours, with an intermission? This movie could have used an extra hour, easily.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Nov 15, 2021 10:24:18 GMT -5
Mentats dont get explained at all. The whole plotline where everyone is suspicious of Jessica was dropped. Characters don't clumsily voiceover their thoughts like Lynch, they clumsily mumble their thoughts in the Fremen tongue. The Baron's portrayal as dark lord is really overdone. Jessica mumblewhispering through the Litany Against Fear was a waste of Herbert's best (and possibly only good) writing. Especially since it's Paul who uses it in the book during the same scene, where it makes more sense. I guess in the movie, showing his prescience was more important than demonstrating his self-possession at that point? Have I said that they should have gone the Lawrence route for this? 4 hours, with an intermission? This movie could have used an extra hour, easily. And they left out some of the best quotables, like the Mentat mantra. I wanted to hear Josh Brolin say "Mood is for cattle and loveplay" and play the baliset.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Nov 15, 2021 12:29:05 GMT -5
Jessica mumblewhispering through the Litany Against Fear was a waste of Herbert's best (and possibly only good) writing. Especially since it's Paul who uses it in the book during the same scene, where it makes more sense. I guess in the movie, showing his prescience was more important than demonstrating his self-possession at that point? Have I said that they should have gone the Lawrence route for this? 4 hours, with an intermission? This movie could have used an extra hour, easily. And they left out some of the best quotables, like the Mentat mantra. I wanted to hear Josh Brolin say "Mood is for cattle and loveplay" and play the baliset. Yes! I was very disappointed by the lack of both cattle and loveplay. To be fair, the mentat mantra was written by either Lynch or Douriff, so they probably couldn't use it for this version. Scenes of Brolin playing the balliset were filmed, but then cut, apparently. Maybe we'll get them as DVD extras? I'd like to see all the bloopers.
|
|
ABz B👹anaz
Grandfathered In
This country is (now less of) a shitshow.
Posts: 1,992
|
Post by ABz B👹anaz on Nov 15, 2021 12:49:00 GMT -5
Mentats: The Freshmaker!
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Nov 21, 2021 16:35:57 GMT -5
One other thing: if you're interested in a long (long) read I suggest The Fremen Mirage by Bret Devereaux. This is not about Dune per se but an exploration and deconstruction of the concept of brutal living conditions producing great warriors like the Fremen and Sardaukar.
Since Part II is going to be all about the battles of these great warriors you might find it interesting. Also the essay is just short enough to be read before Part II comes out.
Will definitely be reading that series of essays at some point which I meant to post a while back but forgot to until now. This tangentially reminds me of an article about the actual Dunc: Part One (2021). I think that issues of cultural appropriation vs. casting movies with just a bunch of white guys is often turned into mere fodder for perfunctory clickbait articles (obviously, there's some that express wholly despicable reactionary bullshit, but even the ones that I'm broadly in sympathy with are rarely particularly insightful). That said I found this guy's critique of how Villeneuve handles the Islamic influences on Dune to be genuinely well considered (albeit I'm coming at this from the perspective of a white American atheist). I suspect the author is probably a bit too eager to read his own interpretation of the Dune Chronicles into Herbert's intentions, but it's well worth a read, imo. It also articulates far better than I could an aspect of my vague sense that, for all its ambition, Villeneuve's adaptation is playing it safe in a way that almost certainly avoids some of the pitfalls of Lynch's film, but also prevents it from being the film it had the potential to be.
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Nov 22, 2021 11:13:33 GMT -5
So is the Baron's gay rapist thing being saved for Part 2 or is that just removed thanks to our change in mores?
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Nov 22, 2021 13:03:38 GMT -5
So is the Baron's gay rapist thing being saved for Part 2 or is that just removed thanks to our change in mores? I will bet a sizable amount of money that nothing along those lines gets mentioned or strongly implied. At most we'll get a leer at whoever ends up playing Feyd Rautha.
|
|
LazBro
Prolific Poster
Posts: 10,280
|
Post by LazBro on Aug 3, 2023 9:29:28 GMT -5
I finally watched Dunc: Part One (2021). I read the first book once as a teenager and again last year. I have not read the other books. I have not seen the Lynch adaptation.
I dunno. I wonder if I would have liked it better had I not read the book as recently. I find myself too focused not on what it is, but what is isn't. It is A Dune, but it is not MY Dune. As others have commented, despite splitting the work into two films, allowing Villeneuve to take the time, the crucial first hour of this one feels rushed as hell. Some of my favorite early scenes are missing: the Baron explaining his plan to Feyd-Rautha and Piter, here replaced with a shorter, to-the-point and less fun scene with Rabban. Like, Skarsgard is okay as the Baron, and the character is originally written as grotesque and totally evil, but in a more delicious, fun kind of way. He's sadistic, but he's a person, too. Also the whole plot line where Jessica is the suspected traitor is gone, as is her terrific scene where she confronts Thufir in her chambers. And the Test for Humanity scene, while certainly here, wasn't staged to my liking, and having Jessica recite the Litany Against Fear instead of Paul was lame. Especially said so quickly and under her breath (a problem with other key lines in the film as well.)
It's hard to believe anyone who hasn't read the book would have any idea what's going on in this thing.
Elsewhere on this forum there was discussion about the pronunciation of names. Arrakis. Harkonnen. Mine is Gesserit. What the hell is "jezzerit?" It's very obviously meant to be a hard G.
Edit: Realized I said the wrong character. It is Thufir who Jessica confronts in her chambers. Can't keep these people straight.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Aug 4, 2023 7:04:53 GMT -5
I finally watched Dunc: Part One (2021). I read the first book once as a teenager and again last year. I have not read the other books. I have not seen the Lynch adaptation.
I dunno. I wonder if I would have liked it better had I not read the book as recently. I find myself too focused not on what it is, but what is isn't. It is A Dune, but it is not MY Dune. As others have commented, despite splitting the work into two films, allowing Villeneuve to take the time, the crucial first hour of this one feels rushed as hell. Some of my favorite early scenes are missing: the Baron explaining his plan to Feyd-Rautha and Piter, here replaced with a shorter, to-the-point and less fun scene with Rabban. Like, Skarsgard is okay as the Baron, and the character is originally written as grotesque and totally evil, but in a more delicious, fun kind of way. He's sadistic, but he's a person, too. Also the whole plot line where Jessica is the suspected traitor is gone, as is her terrific scene where she confronts Gurney in her chambers. And the Test for Humanity scene, while certainly here, wasn't staged to my liking, and having Jessica recite the Litany Against Fear instead of Paul was lame. Especially said so quickly and under her breath (a problem with other key lines in the film as well.)
It's hard to believe anyone who hasn't read the book would have any idea what's going on in this thing.
Elsewhere on this forum there was discussion about the pronunciation of names. Arrakis. Harkonnen. Mine is Gesserit. What the hell is "jezzerit?" It's very obviously meant to be a hard G.
Bene Gesserit is not pronounced with a hard g from everything I’ve seen or heard.
|
|
LazBro
Prolific Poster
Posts: 10,280
|
Post by LazBro on Aug 4, 2023 10:16:23 GMT -5
Bene Gesserit is not pronounced with a hard g from everything I’ve seen or heard. But the book even says it's a hard G. Book 1, part 17. When Jessica summons Thufir Hawat to her chambers. -- "Why have you never made full use of my abilities in your service to the Duke?" she asked. "Do you fear a rival for your position?"
He glared at her, the old eyes blazing. "I know some of the training they give you Bene Gesserit." He broke off, scowling.
"I'm sorry, Bene what now?"
"My Lady?"
"Gesserit? Was that it? Gesserit? Are you stupid?"
"I don't..."
"It's Gesserit. Ge-sser-it." Jessica wielded the G sharp as a crysknife. "You absolute sack of potatoes. You fucking bowl of soup."
The old mentat bit his words short, "My Lady, I meant no offense."
"Suck my balls!" Jessica said.
--
I'm surprised how few people remember this exchange.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Mar 2, 2024 0:40:22 GMT -5
What does everyone think of Dunc: Part Two (2024)?
|
|
Rainbow Rosa
TI Forumite
not gay, just colorful
Posts: 3,604
|
Post by Rainbow Rosa on Mar 4, 2024 14:53:29 GMT -5
So is the Baron's gay rapist thing being saved for Part 2 or is that just removed thanks to our change in mores? I've waited 28 months for an answer to this.
|
|
|
Post by MrsLangdonAlger on Mar 4, 2024 19:58:34 GMT -5
What does everyone think of Dunc: Part Two (2024)?
|
|
|
Post by sarapen on Mar 6, 2024 10:59:36 GMT -5
Well, the gay rapist thing is just gone now. It's interesting that Villeneuve brought out the religious/political aspect in contrast to Lynch's version from the 80s. I don't recall the word "fundamentalist" ever being used in the books but they said it a bunch of times in the movie. Just goes to show how movies are always a product of their time.
|
|
|
Post by MrsLangdonAlger on Mar 6, 2024 11:09:32 GMT -5
I'm seeing it again this coming Saturday. Honestly I'd see it every single Saturday until another new movie I want to see comes out, but....another new movie I want to see (Love Lies Bleeding) comes out next weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Mar 6, 2024 13:23:22 GMT -5
I'm seeing it again this coming Saturday. Honestly I'd see it every single Saturday until another new movie I want to see comes out, but....another new movie I want to see (Love Lies Bleeding) comes out next weekend. MLA, what are your thoughts on Villeneuve’s films in general, and what were your thoughts on Dune: Part One?
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Mar 6, 2024 13:39:15 GMT -5
I'm seeing it again this coming Saturday. Honestly I'd see it every single Saturday until another new movie I want to see comes out, but....another new movie I want to see (Love Lies Bleeding) comes out next weekend. MLA, what are your thoughts on Villeneuve’s films in general, and what were your thoughts on Dune: Part One? I want to let MLA get her thoughts in before out of courtesy but I did a double feature on Enemy & Prisoners in advance of Dune and have thoughts on those strange films.
|
|
|
Post by Roy Batty's Pet Dove on Mar 6, 2024 14:02:01 GMT -5
MLA, what are your thoughts on Villeneuve’s films in general, and what were your thoughts on Dune: Part One? I want to let MLA get her thoughts in before out of courtesy but I did a double feature on Enemy & Prisoners in advance of Dune and have thoughts on those strange films. I think Enemy is good, but I haven’t seen Prisoners yet.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 6, 2024 21:02:43 GMT -5
So is the Baron's gay rapist thing being saved for Part 2 or is that just removed thanks to our change in mores? I will bet a sizable amount of money that nothing along those lines gets mentioned or strongly implied. At most we'll get a leer at whoever ends up playing Feyd Rautha. As I predicted. They even took care to make sure that when Rabban hears screams behind the door and then is invited in by the Baron, the figures crumpled in the corner are clearly female. I am sympathetic to the charge that Lynch unnecessarily gave the Baron visible sores along with the book-original gay characterization while AIDS was on everyone's mind. This movie swung away from that as hard as possible.
|
|
|
Post by pantsgoblin on Mar 7, 2024 9:25:36 GMT -5
I want to let MLA get her thoughts in before out of courtesy but I did a double feature on Enemy & Prisoners in advance of Dune and have thoughts on those strange films. I think Enemy is good, but I haven’t seen Prisoners yet. They're both of a piece about Villaneuve's pet themes of isolation and misunderstanding ( Enemy is all about the liminal spaces) though I think his obsessions falter somewhat on Prisoners. Gyllenhaal appears to be literally the only cop in a mid-sized Pennsylvania city and it's quite absurd how he has to investigate everything solo and never has backup or support. The performances are mostly strong; Hugh Jackman is typically good and does surprisingly well with a Philly-area accent, plus Paul Dano does fine with a tricky role as a mentally-challenged character. However, I found the relentless brutality the characters inflict on each other wearying.
|
|
|
Post by ganews on Mar 7, 2024 23:02:51 GMT -5
Brief thoughts:
Outstanding visuals, obviously. Paul's first sandworm ride is one of the most arresting things I've seen in a movie.
Good score. BWAAAAMP was not overused.
I was impressed the Harkonnen fighting arena made it in to the movie. It's good characterization that isn't particularly necessary to the story, if you need to cut something. (Like they cut the more interesting state dinner in Part 1, but obvious fight scenes look cooler.) It was very cool though.
Austin Butler as Feyd was great. When has someone looked so snakelike without prosthetics? He's so menacing that I didn't even think of Anthony Carrigan lisping "Hey, Barry."
Props to Bautista for giving Rabban an appropriate mouth-open dumbness throughout.
Perhaps the filmmakers agreed with me that everyone mumbling out loud to themselves in Part 1 was dumb as hell, because the voiceover was back.
They basically cut everything that made Paul seem less than immediately expert at everything. His awkwardly asking Chani to hold his water rings; comically having to "marry" the window of Jamis; his first worm ride being successful but amateurish.
Thufir Hawat was one of the most underserved roles. His story in particular is so cool, and the idea of the Mentat is so interesting. It's a shame. Jessica was at least much better served in Part 2, really stepping in to power.
The timeline is 100% ridiculous. Paul's thopter crash lands when his mother is a month pregnant, but before Alia is born he has won the allegiance of all of the Fremen and learned everything they know. Stilgar is ready to be killed by Paul in combat because he is grown too old...as if he were significantly older than when they met. The point of making two movies should be to take advantage of the timeskip.
Paul in the book was in a coma for a month changing the water if life. The movie was too cowardly to produce the extended acid trip that action deserved. As they were too cowardly to use the word Jihad.
The final marriage to Irulan is played like the ultimate betrayal of Chani, which could not be more different. But the changes to Chani deserve their own post.
|
|
|
Post by MrsLangdonAlger on Mar 8, 2024 9:47:47 GMT -5
I'm seeing it again this coming Saturday. Honestly I'd see it every single Saturday until another new movie I want to see comes out, but....another new movie I want to see (Love Lies Bleeding) comes out next weekend. MLA, what are your thoughts on Villeneuve’s films in general, and what were your thoughts on Dune: Part One? Love all of them except Sicario. And Arrival is one of my favorites of all time. He manages to blend action and emotion in a way I really respect and rarely see.
|
|
|
Post by Celebith on Mar 11, 2024 0:43:40 GMT -5
I finally watched Dunc: Part One (2021). I read the first book once as a teenager and again last year. I have not read the other books. I have not seen the Lynch adaptation. And the Test for Humanity scene, while certainly here, wasn't staged to my liking, and having Jessica recite the Litany Against Fear instead of Paul was lame. Especially said so quickly and under her breath (a problem with other key lines in the film as well.)
Elsewhere on this forum there was discussion about the pronunciation of names. Arrakis. Harkonnen. Mine is Gesserit. What the hell is "jezzerit?" It's very obviously meant to be a hard G.
The litany thing bugged me, even though I liked the rest of the movie well enough. It's so central to the novel, and at least the first trilogy. I'm 99.44% sure that it's jezzerit, or at the least jess-ur-it. That's how I've heard it almost everywhere else. Supposed to evoke the Jesuits. (ETA: According to Brian Herbert, among other sources: His Irish Catholic maternal aunts, who attempted to force religion on him, became the models for the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood of Dune. It is no accident that the pronunciations of ‘Gesserit’ and ‘Jesuit’ are similar, as he envisioned his maternal aunts and the Bene Gesserit of Dune as female Jesuits.)Here's Frank Herbert pronouncing it himself. It's like the 'G' in 'gif'.
|
|